Update on endoscopic tissue sampling devices

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 741-745

  Barkun, Alan ^a   Liu, Julia ^a   Carpenter, Steven ^a   Chotiprasidhi, Poonputt ^a   Chuttani, Ram ^a   Ginsberg, Gregory ^a   Hussain, Nadeem ^a   Silverman, William ^a   Taitelbaum, Greta ^a   Petersen, Bret T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT;

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; BURN; CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CAUTERIZATION; COLON CANCER; DEVICE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM PERFORATION; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS CANDIDIASIS; FORCEPS; GASTROINTESTINAL BIOPSY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INFECTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; STOMACH CANCER; VATER PAPILLA TUMOR;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM NEOPLASMS; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GASTROSCOPES; HUMANS; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING;

EID: 33646149387     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.041     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. The role of endoscopy in the surveillance of premalignant conditions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Guidelines for clinical application. Gastrointest Endosc 34 Suppl 3 (1988) 18S-20S
2. The role of colonoscopy in the management of patients with colonic polyps. Guidelines for clinical application. Gastrointest Endosc 34 Suppl 3 (1988) 6S-7S
3. Tissue sampling and analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 37 (1991) 663-665
4. Gilbert D.A., DiMarino A.J., Jensen D.M., et al. Status evaluation: hot biopsy forceps. Gastrointest Endosc 38 (1992) 753-756
5. Croffie J., Carpenter S., Chuttani R., et al. Technology assessment status evaluation: disposable endoscopic accessories. Gastrointest Endosc 62 (2005) 477-479
6. Biliary and pancreatic sampling devices during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 43 (1996) 775-778
7. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology status evaluation: device reprocessing companies: May 1998. Gastrointest Endosc 48 (1998) 717-722
8. Carr-Locke D.L., al-Kawas F.H., Branch M.S., et al. Technology assessment status evaluation: bipolar and multipolar accessories, February 1996. Gastroenterol Nurs 21 (1998) 187-189
9. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ASGE guidelines for clinical application: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 50 (1999) 915-920
10. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ASGE guidelines for clinical application: the role of colonoscopy in the management of patients with colonic polyps neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 50 (1999) 921-924
11. Faigel D.O., Eisen G.M., Baron T.H., et al. Tissue sampling and analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 57 (2003) 811-816
12. Baron T.H., Mallery J.S., Hirota W.K., et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003) 643-649
13. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology assessment status evaluation: tissue sampling during endosonography, February 1997. Gastrointest Endosc 47 (1998) 576-578
14. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology status report evaluation: endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 52 (2000) 860-863
15. Bernstein D.E., Barkin J.S., Reiner D.K., et al. Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle. Gastrointest Endosc 41 (1995) 573-576
16. Carpenter S., Petersen B.T., Chuttani R., et al. ASGE technology status evaluation report: polypectomy devices. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) in press
17. Levine D.S., Blount P.L., Rudolph R.E., et al. Safety of a systematic endoscopic biopsy protocol in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 95 (2000) 1152-1157
18. de Bellis M., Sherman S., Fogel E.L., et al. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (part 1). Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 552-561
19. de Bellis M., Sherman S., Fogel E.L., et al. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (part 2). Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 720-730
20. Forde K.A., Treat M.R., and Tsai J.L. Initial clinical experience with a bipolar snare for colon polypectomy. Surg Endosc 7 (1993) 427-428
21. Tappero G., Gaia E., De Giuli P., et al. Cold snare excision of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 38 (1992) 310-313
22. McAfee J.H., and Katon R.M. Tiny snares prove safe and effective for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 40 (1994) 301-303
23. Foutch P.G., Harlan J.R., Kerr D., et al. Wire-guided brush cytology: a new endoscopic method for diagnosis of bile duct cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 35 (1989) 243-247
24. Casco C., Martins D., Lettieri S., et al. A new device for abrasive cytology sampling during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: experience in infectious and neoplastic diseases. Endoscopy 31 (1999) 348-351
25. Howell D.A., Beveridge R.P., Bosco J., et al. Endoscopic needle aspiration biopsy at ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 38 (1992) 531-535
26. Wegener M., and Adamek R. Puncture of submucosal and extrinsic tumors: is there a clinical need? Puncture techniques and their accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 5 (1995) 615-623
27. Inoue H., Kawano T., Takeshita K., et al. Modified soft-balloon methods during ultrasonic probe examination for superficial esophageal cancer. Endoscopy 30 Suppl 1 (1998) A41-A43
28. Padda S., Shah I., and Ramirez F.C. Adequacy of mucosal sampling with the "two-bite" forceps technique: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. Gastrointest Endosc 57 (2003) 170-173
29. Kadakia S.C., Angueira C.E., Ward J.A., et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients taking antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants: survey of ASGE members. Gastrointest Endosc 44 (1996) 309-316
30. Eisen G.M., Baron T.H., Dominitz J.A., et al. Guideline on the management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002) 775-779
31. de Bellis M., Fogel E.L., Sherman S., et al. Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003) 176-182
32. Jailwala J., Fogel E.L., Sherman S., et al. Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 383-390
33. Eisen G.M., Dominitz J.A., Faigel D.O., et al. An annotated algorithmic approach to malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 53 (2001) 849-852
34. Dominitz J.A., Eisen G.M., Baron T.H., et al. Complications of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 57 (2003) 441-445
35. Eisen G.M., Baron T.H., Dominitz J.A., et al. Complications of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002) 784-793
36. Bronowicki J.P., Venard V., Botte C., et al. Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus during colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 337 (1997) 237-240
37. Wexner S.D., Garbus J.E., and Singh J.J. A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies: reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15 (2001) 251-261
38. Weston A.P., and Campbell D.R. Diminutive colonic polyps: histopathology, spatial distribution, concomitant significant lesions, and treatment complications. Am J Gastroenterol 90 (1995) 24-28
39. Wadas D.D., and Sanowski R.A. Complications of the hot biopsy forceps technique. Gastrointest Endosc 34 (1988) 32-37
40. Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: lessons to learn from an experience with 1576 polyps. Am Surg 54 (1988) 61-63
41. In: Rankin G., and Sivack M.J. (Eds). Indications, contraindications, and complications of colonoscopy. 2nd ed. (1999), WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia
42. Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy. An experience with 1,555 polypectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 29 (1986) 825-830
43. Van Gossum A., Cozzoli A., Adler M., et al. Colonoscopic snare polypectomy: analysis of 1485 resections comparing two types of current. Gastrointest Endosc 38 (1992) 472-475
44. Kinney T.P., Kozarek R.A., Raltz S., et al. Contamination of single-use biopsy forceps: a prospective in vitro analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 209-212
45. Yang R., Naritoku W., and Laine L. Prospective, randomized comparison of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 40 (1994) 671-674
46. Woods K.L., Anand B.S., Cole R.A., et al. Influence of endoscopic biopsy forceps characteristics on tissue specimens: results of a prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 49 (1999) 177-183
47. Fantin A.C., Neuweiler J., Binek J.S., et al. Diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens: comparison between a conventional biopsy forceps and multibite forceps. Gastrointest Endosc 54 (2001) 600-604
48. Camp R., Rutkowski M.A., Atkison K., et al. A prospective, randomized, blinded trial of cytological yield with disposable cytology brushes in upper gastrointestinal tract lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 87 (1992) 1439-1442
49. Kozarek R.A. Expandable endoprostheses for gastrointestinal stenoses. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 4 (1994) 279-295
50. Yang R., Ng S., Nichol M., et al. A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 266-270
51. Deprez P.H., Horsmans Y., Van Hassel M., et al. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 262-265
52. Rizzo J., Bernstein D., and Gress F. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 257-261
53. Kozarek R.A., Raltz S.L., Brandabur J.J., et al. In vitro study and in vivo application of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome. Endoscopy 33 (2001) 401-404
54. Jung M., Beilenhoff U., Pietsch M., et al. Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study. Endoscopy 35 (2003) 197-202