Alternative rubber dam isolation technique for the restoration of Class V cervical lesions

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 277-280

  Owens, Barry M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646125175     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/05-12     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Duke ES (2003) The science and practice of dental adhesive systems Compendium 24(6) 417-419, 421, 423-424.
2. Grippo JO, Simring M & Schreiner S (2004) Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction revisited Journal of the American Dental Association 135(8) 1109-1118.
3. Leinfelder KF & Kurdziolek (2003) Self-etching bonding agents Compendium 24(6) 447-454, 456.
4. Smales RJ (1993) Rubber dam usage related to restoration quality and survival British Dental Journal 174(9) 330-333.
5. Vandewalle KS & Vigil G (1997) Guidelines for the restoration of Class V lesions General Dentistry 45(3) 254-260.
6. van Dijken JW & Horstedt P (1987) Effect of the use of rubber dam versus cotton rolls on marginal adaptation of composite resin fillings to acid-etched Acta Odontologic Scandinavia 45(5) 303-308.
7. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges Operative Dentistry 28(3) 215-235.