Prosthetic Intervention Effects on Activity of Lower-Extremity Amputees

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 717-722

  Klute, Glenn K ^a,b   Berge, Jocelyn S ^a   Orendurff, Michael S ^a,c   Williams, Rhonda M ^a,c   Czerniecki, Joseph M ^a,c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Amputees; Artificial limbs; Gait; Lower extremity; Monitoring, ambulatory; Rehabilitation; Walking

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMUR; GAIT; HUMAN; LEG AMPUTATION; LEG MOVEMENT; LEG PROSTHESIS; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MOBILIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PROSTHESIS; RECREATION; TIBIA; VOCATION; WALKING;

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LEG; MICROCOMPUTERS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; WALKING;

EID: 33646119654     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Czerniecki J.M. Research and clinical selection of foot-ankle systems. J Prosthet Orthot 17 4 Suppl (2005) 1-3
2. van der Linde H., Hofstad C.J., Geurts A.C., Postema K., Geertzen J.H., and van Limbeek J. A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 41 (2004) 550-570
3. Gitter A., Czerniecki J.M., and DeGroot D.M. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 70 (1991) 142-148
4. Lehmann J.F., Price R., Boswell-Bessette S., Dralle A., and Questad K. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet. Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 (1993) 853-861
5. Lehmann J.F., Price R., Boswell-Bessette S., Dralle A., Questad K., and deLateur B.J. Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet. Flex Foot and Seattle Foot versus standard SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 (1993) 1225-1231
6. Perry J., and Shanfield S. Efficiency of dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet. J Rehabil Res Dev 30 (1993) 137-143
7. Postema K., Hermens H.J., de Vries J., Koopman H.F., and Eisma W.H. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 1: Biomechanical analysis related to user benefits. Prosthet Orthot Int 21 (1997) 17-27
8. Torburn L., Schweiger G.P., and PerryJPowers C.M. Below-knee amputee gait in stair ambulation. A comparison of stride characteristics using five different prosthetic feet. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1994) 185-192 Jun(303)
9. Buckley J.G., Jones S.F., and Birch K.M. Oxygen consumption during ambulation. comparison of using a prosthesis fitted with and without a tele-torsion device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 (2002) 576-580
10. Gard S.A., and Konz R.J. The effect of a shock-absorbing pylon on the gait of persons with unilateral transtibial amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 40 (2003) 109-124
11. Berge JS, Czerniecki JM, Klute GK. Efficacy of a shock-absorbing pylon based on laboratory, field, and outcome metrics. J Rehabil Res Dev. In press.
12. Datta D., Heller B., and Howitt J. A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control. Clin Rehabil 19 (2005) 398-403
13. Rietman J.S., Postema K., and Geertzen J.H. Gait analysis in prosthetics. opinions, ideas and conclusions. Prosthet Orthot Int 26 (2002) 50-57
14. Day H.J. The assessment and description of amputee activity. Prosthet Orthot Int 5 (1981) 23-28
15. Coleman K.L., Smith D.G., Boone D.A., Joseph A.W., and del Aguila M.A. Step activity monitor. long-term, continuous recording of ambulatory function. J Rehabil Res Dev 36 (1999) 8-18
16. Bussmann J.B., Culhane K.M., Horemans H.L., Lyons G.M., and Stam H.J. Validity of the prosthetic activity monitor to assess the duration and spatio-temporal characteristics of prosthetic walking. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 12 (2004) 379-386
17. Holden J.M., and Fernie G.R. Extent of artificial limb use following rehabilitation. J Orthop Res 5 (1987) 562-568
18. Coleman K.L., Boone D.A., Laing L.S., Mathews D.E., and Smith D.G. Quantification of prosthetic outcomes. elastomeric gel liner with locking pin suspension versus polyethylene foam liner with neoprene sleeve suspension. J Rehabil Res Dev 41 (2004) 591-602
19. Bussmann J.B., Grootscholten E.A., and Stam H.J. Daily physical activity and heart rate response in people with a unilateral transtibial amputation for vascular disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85 (2004) 240-244
20. Lerner-Frankiel M.B., Vargus S., Brown M., Krusell L., and Schoneberger W. Functional community ambulation. what are your criteria?. Clin Manage Phys Ther 6 2 (1986) 12-15
21. Holden J.M., Fernie G.R., Soto M., and Lobb R. Ambulatory activity measurement. In: Kenedi R.M., Paul J.P., and Hughes J. (Eds). Disability. proceedings of a seminar on rehabilitation of the disabled (1979), MacMillan, London 154-159
22. Hartsell H., Fitzpatrick D., Brand R., Frantz R., and Saltzman C. Accuracy of a custom-designed activity monitor. implications for diabetic foot ulcer healing. J Rehabil Res Dev 39 (2002) 395-400
23. Haeuber E., Shaughnessy M., Forrester L.W., Coleman K.L., and Macko R.F. Accelerometer monitoring of home- and community-based ambulatory activity after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85 (2004) 1997-2001
24. McDonald C.M., Widman L., Abresch R.T., Walsh S.A., and Walsh D.D. for the measurement of daily ambulatory activity in children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 (2005) 793-801
25. Sedgman R., Goldie P., and Iansek R. Development of a measure of turning during walking. Advancing Rehabilitation. Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference of the Faculty of Health Sciences (1994), La Trobe University, Melbourne (Aust)