Dimensions of Disordered Attention in Traumatic Brain Injury: Further Validation of the Moss Attention Rating Scale

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 647-655

  Hart, Tessa ^a   Whyte, John ^a   Millis, Scott ^b   Bode, Rita ^c   Malec, James ^d   Richardson, Risa Nakase ^e   Hammond, Flora ^f  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^e METHODIST REHABILITATION CENTER   (United States)

^f Charlotte Inst of Rehabilitation   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Brain injuries; Cognition disorders; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DISTURBANCE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISTRACTIBILITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOSS ATTENTION RATING SCALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION CENTER; RESTLESSNESS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; BRAIN INJURIES; COHORT STUDIES; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR AGITATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 33646115815     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.01.016     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Jacobs H. The Los Angeles Head Injury Survey. procedures and initial findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69 (1988) 425-431
2. McKinlay W., Brooks D., Bond M., Martinage D., and Marshall M. The short term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by relatives of the injured persons. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 44 (1981) 527-533
3. Ponsford J., and Kinsella G. Attention deficits after closed-head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 14 (1992) 822-838
4. Whyte J., Polansky M., Fleming M., Coslett H., and Cavallucci C. Sustained arousal and attention after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 33 (1995) 797-813
5. Whyte J., Fleming M., Polansky M., and Cavallucci C. The effects of visual distraction following traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 4 (1998) 126-136
6. McDowell S., Whyte J., and D'Esposito M. Working memory impairments in traumatic brain injury. evidence from a dual-task paradigm. Neuropsychologia 35 (1997) 1341-1353
7. Raz A. Anatomy of attentional networks. Anat Rec B New Anat 281 (2004) 21-36
8. Whyte J., Hart T., Vaccaro M., et al. The effects of methylphenidate on attention deficits after traumatic brain injury. a multi-dimensional randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 83 (2004) 401-420
9. Riccio C., and French C. The status of empirical support for treatment of attention deficits. Clin Neuropsychol 18 (2004) 528-558
10. Whyte J., and Fifth International Association for the Study of Traumatic Brain Injury. Attentional function after traumatic brain injury. what's impaired, what's preserved and why?. In: Ponsford J., Snow P., and Anderson V. (Eds). International perspectives in traumatic brain injury (1998), Aust Acad Pr, Melbourne 154-159
11. Kennedy R., Nakase-Thompson R., Sherer M., and Nick T. Use of the cognitive test for delirium in patients with traumatic brain injury. Psychosomatics 44 4 (2003) 1-7
12. Boake C., Millis S., High W., et al. Using early neuropsychological testing to predict long-term productivity outcome from traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 (2001) 761-768
13. Whyte J., Schuster K., Polansky M., Adams J., and Coslet H.B. Frequency and duration of inattentive behavior after traumatic brain injury. effects of distraction, task and practice. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 6 (2000) 1-11
14. Hart T., Giovanenetti T., Montgomery M., and Schwartz M. Awareness of errors in naturalistic action after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 13 5 (1998) 16-28
15. Hinshaw S., and Nigg J. Behavior rating scales in the assessment of disruptive behavior problems in childhood. In: Shaffer D., Lucas C.P., and Richters J.E. (Eds). Diagnostic assessment in child and adolescent psychopathology (1999), Guilford Pr, New York 91-126
16. Ponsford J., and Kinsella G. The use of a rating scale of attentional behavior. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1 (1991) 241-257
17. Whyte J., Hart T., Bode R., and Malec J.F. The Moss Attention Rating Scale (MARS) for traumatic brain injury. initial psychometric assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84 (2003) 268-276
18. van Zomeren A., and Brouwer W. Clinical neuropsychology of attention (1994), Oxford Univ Pr, New York
19. Spikman J., Timmerman M., van Zomeren A., and Deelman B. Recovery versus retest effects in attention after closed head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 21 (1999) 585-605
20. Mirsky A., Anthony B., Duncan C., Ahearn M., and Kellam S. Analysis of the elements of attention. a neuropsychological approach. Neuropsychol Rev 2 (1991) 109-145
21. Mirsky A. Disorders of attention. a neuropsychological perspective. In: Lyon G.R., and Krasnego N.A. (Eds). Attention, memory and executive function (1996), PH Brookes, Baltimore 71-95
22. Pogge D., Stokes J., and Harvey P. Empirical evaluation of the factorial structure of attention in adolescent psychiatric patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 16 (1994) 344-353
23. Bushnik T. Introduction. the traumatic brain injury model systems of care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84 (2003) 151-160
24. Teasdale G., and Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet 2 (1974) 81-84
25. Joreskog K., Sorbom D., du Toit S., and du Toit M. LISREL 8. new statistical features (2000), Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood
26. Wright B., and Masters G. Rating scale analysis. Rasch measurement (1982), Mesa Pr, Chicago
27. Smith E.V. Evidence for the reliability of measures and the validity of measure interpretation. a Rasch measurement perspective. J Appl Meas 2 (2001) 281-311
28. Bond T., and Fox C. Applying the Rasch model. fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
29. Hu L., and Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling 6 1 (1999) 1-55
30. Raferty A.E. Bayesian model selection in structural equation models. In: Bollen K.A., and Long J.S. (Eds). Testing structural equation models (1993), Sage, Newbury Park 163-180
31. Spikman J., Kiers H., Deelman B., and van Zomeran A. Construct validity of concepts of attention in healthy controls and patients with CHI. Brain Cogn 47 (2001) 446-460
32. Delis D., Jacobson M., Bondi M., Hamilton J., and Salmon D. The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations. lessons from memory assessment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 9 (2003) 947-953