Being a family in the midst of living and dying

Journal of Palliative Care

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 26-32

  Syrén, Susanne M ^a   Saveman, Britt Inger ^a   Benzein, Eva G ^a  

^a LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646108342     PISSN: 08258597     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/082585970602200105     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lerner M. Training for cancer an interview with Michael Lerner. J Mind Body Health 1994; 10: 27-37.
2. Rolland JS. In sickness and in health: the impact of illness on couples' relationships. J Marital Fam Ther 1994; 20: 327-338.
3. Sherman AC, Simonton S. Family therapy for cancer patients: clinical issues and interventions. Fam J 1999; 7: 38-50.
4. Chesla CA. Hermeneutic phenomenology: an approach to understanding families. J Fam Nurs 1995; 1: 36-79.
5. Hartrick GA. Transforming family nursing theory: from mechanism to contextualism. J Fam Nurs 1995; 1: 134-147.
6. Hartrick GA. The lived experience of family: a contextual approach to family nursing practice. J Fam Nurs 1995; 1: 148-171.
7. Kristjanson LJ, White K. Clinical support for families in the palliative care phase of hematologic or oncologic illness. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2002; 16: 745-762.
8. Deacon SA. Creativity within qualitative research on families: new ideas for old methods. Qual Rep 2000; 4: 124-134.
9. McClements SE, Woodgate RL. Research with families in palliative care: conceptual and methodological challenges. Eur J Cancer Care 1998; 7: 247-254.
10. Browne N, Robinson L, Richardson A. A Delphi study on the research priorities of European oncology nurses. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2002; 6: 133-144.
11. Reimer JC, Davies B, Martens N. The nurses' role in helping families through the transition of "fading away". Cancer Nurs 1991; 14: 321-327.
12. th edition. Philadelphia: RA. Davis, 2005.
13. Mishler EG. Research Interviewing. Context and narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.
14. Tomm K. Interventive interviewing - Part II. Reflexive questioning as a means to enable self-healing. Fam Process 1987; 26: 167-183.
15. Tomm K. Interventive interviewing - Part III. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic, or reflexive questions? Fam Process 1988; 27: 1-15.
16. Giorgi A. Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In: Giorgi A (ed). Phenomenological and Psychological Research. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1985; pp. 8-22.
17. Giorgi A. The theory, practice and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. J Phenomenological Psychol 1997; 28: 235-260.
18. Geanellos R. Hermeneutic philosophy. Part 1: Implications of its use as methodology in interpretive nursing research. Nurs Inq 1998; 5: 154-163.
19. Eriksson K. Understanding the world of the patient, the suffering human being-the new clinical paradigm from nursing to caring. Adv Pract Nurs Q 1997; 3: 8-13.
20. Benzein E, Norberg A, Saveman B-I. The meaning of the lived experience of hope in patients with cancer in palliative home care. Palliat Med 2001; 15: 117-126.
21. Råholm M-B, Lindholm L, Eriksson K. Grasping the essence of the spiritual dimensions reflected through the horizon of suffering: an interpretative research synthesis. Aust J Holist Nurs 2002; 9: 4-13.
22. Sakalys JA. Restoring the patient's voice. The therapeutics of illness narratives. J Holist Nurs 2003; 21: 228-241.
23. Murray MA, Miller T, Fiset V, O'Connor A, Jacobsen MJ. Decision support: helping patients and families to find balance at the end of life. Int J Palliat Nurs 2004; 10: 270-277.
24. O'Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ. Decisional conflict: assessing and supporting patients experiencing uncertainty about choices affecting their health. University of Ottawa Course, 2003. Web site for NSG6133: http://137.122.151.29/
25. Benzein E, Saveman B-I, Norberg A. The meaning of hope in healthy nonreligious Swedes. West J Nurs Res 2000; 22: 303-319.
26. Frank AW. Reclaiming an orphan genre: the first-person narrative of illness. Lit Med 1994; 13: 1-21.
27. Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educ Commun Technd 1981; 29: 75-91.