Outcome of second delivery after prior macrosomic infant in women with normal glucose tolerance

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 857-862

  Mahony, Rhona ^a   Walsh, Colin ^a   Foley, Michael E ^a   Daly, Leslie ^a   O'Herlihy, Colm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANUS SPHINCTER DISORDER; ANUS SPHINCTER INJURY; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; FEMALE; FETUS WEIGHT; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFANT; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIMIPARA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; VAGINAL DELIVERY; BIRTH WEIGHT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; GESTATIONAL AGE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; MATERNAL AGE; METHODOLOGY; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PRENATAL CARE; PROBABILITY; REFERENCE VALUE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME;

ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; FETAL WEIGHT; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GESTATIONAL AGE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MATERNAL AGE; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRENATAL CARE; PROBABILITY; REFERENCE VALUES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33646103433     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000203340.09961.0b     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Turner MJ, Rasmussen MJ, Boylan PC, MacDonald D, Stronge JM. The influence of birth weight on labor in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:159-63.
2. Mocanu EV, Greene RA, Byrne BM, Turner MJ. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of babies weighting more than 4.5 kg: an analysis by parity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;92:229-33.
3. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994;308:887-91.
4. Geary M, McParland P, Johnson H, Stronge J. Shoulder dystocia - is it predictable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995;62:15-8.
5. Ecker JL, Greenberg JA, Norwitz ER, Nadel AS, Repke JT. Birth weight as a predictor of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:643-7.
6. Davis R, Woelk G, Mueller BA, Daling J. The role of previous birthweight on risk for macrosomia in a subsequent birth. Epidemiology 1995;6:607-11.
7. Chauhan SP, Cowan BD, Magann EF, Bradford TH, Roberts WE, Morrison JC. Intrapartum detection of a macrosomic fetus: clinical versus 8 sonographic models. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;35:266-70.
8. Weiner Z, Ben-Shlomo I, Beck-Fruchter R, Goldberg Y, Shalev E. Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in the large for gestational age fetus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;105:20-4.
9. Sandmire HF. Whither ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia? Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:860-2.
10. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA 1996;276:1480-6.
11. Gonen R, Bader D, Ajami M. Effects of a policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases of suspected fetal macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1296-300.
12. O'Driscoll K, Meagher D, Boylan P. Active management of labor. 3rd ed. London (UK): Mosby; 1993.
13. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes 1979;28:1039-57.
14. Stronge JM, McQuillan K, Robson M, Johnson H. Factors affecting mode of delivery in labor following a single previous birth by caesarean section. J Obstet Gynecol 1996;16:353-7.
15. Fitzpatrick M, Cassidy M, O'Connell, PR, O'Herlihy, C. Experience with an obstetric perineal clinic. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;100:199-203.
16. Parry S, Severs CP, Sehdev HM, Macones GA, White LM, Morgan MA. Ultrasonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia: association with cesarean delivery. J Reprod Med 2000;45:17-22.
17. Weeks JW, Pitman T, Spinnato JA 2nd. Fetal macrosomia: does antenatal prediction affect delivery route and birth outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1215-9.
18. Horrigan TJ. Physicians who induce labor for fetal macrosomia do not reduce cesarean delivery rates. J Perinatol 2001;21:93-6.
19. Haram K, Pirhonen J, Bergsjo P. Suspected big baby: a difficult problem in obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:185-94.
20. Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, Johnson H, O'Connell, PR, O'Herlihy C. Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:955-61.
21. Bahar AM. Risk factors and fetal outcome in cases of shoulder dystocia compared with normal deliveries of a similar birthweight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:868-72.
22. Nesbitt TS, Gilbert WM, Herrchen B. Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with a macrosomic infants born in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:476-80.
23. Culligan PJ, Myers JA, Goldberg RP, Blackwell L, Gohmann SF, Abell TD. Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated with macrosomia - a decision analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005;16:19-28.
24. Rouse DJ, Owen J. Prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography - a Faustian bargain? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:332-8.
25. Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert JF, Macones G. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:824-30.
26. Aboulfalah A, Abbassi H, El Karroumi M, Morsad F, Samouh N, Matar N, El Mansouri A. Delivery of large baby after cesarean section: role of trial of labor. Apropos of 355 cases [in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2000;29:409-13.
27. Onwude JL, Rao S, Selo-Ojeme DO. Large babies and unplanned Cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;118:36-39.