Performance-related ontologies and semantic web applications for on-line performance assessment of intelligent systems

Science of Computer Programming

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 27-37

  Lera, Isaac ^a   Juiz, Carlos ^a   Puigjaner, Ramon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ontology engineering; Performance engineering; Semantic web

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; SEMANTICS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; VALUE ENGINEERING;

ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING; PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING; SEMANTIC WEB;

INTELLIGENT NETWORKS;

EID: 33646098400     PISSN: 01676423     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2005.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., and Lassila O. The Semantic Web (2001), Scientific American May
2. Davies J., Fensel D., and van Harmelen F. Towards the Semantic Web (2003), John Wiley & Sons
3. DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML). http://www.daml.org/
4. Genesereth M.R., and Nilsson N.J. Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence (1987), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Los Altos, CA
5. Gruber T. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications (1993), Academic Press Ltd., London
6. Guarino N. Formal Ontology and Information Systems. 1st International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems. FOIS'98, Italy (1998), IOS Press 3-15
7. J.R. Hobbs, A DAML Ontology of Time, Part of the DARPA Agent Markup Language project
8. R. Jain, Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis Techniques For Experimental Design Measurements Simulation and Modeling, Wiley Computer Publishing, John Wiley & Sons, Inc
9. Jena, Java framework for building Semantic Web applications. http://jena.sourceforge.net/
10. I. Lera, C. Juiz, R. Puigjaner, C. Kurz, G. Haring, J. Zottl, Performance assessment on ambient intelligent applications through ontologies, in: ACM Proceedings WOSP'05, 2005, pp. 205-216
11. I. Lera, C. Juiz, Puigjaner, Web Operational Analysis through Performance-related Ontologies in OWL for Intelligent Applications, in: LNCS Proceedings ICWE'05, 2005
12. D. Petriu, H. Shen, Applying the UML Performance Profile: Graph Grammar-based Derivation of LQN Models from UML Specifications, February 2002
13. Protégé is a tool which allows users to construct domain ontologies. http://protege.stanford.edu/
14. Object Management Group (OMG). UML Profile for Schedulability (March 2002), Performance and Time Specification
15. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
16. OWL-S supplies Web service providers with a core set of markup language constructs for describing the properties and capabilities of their Web services. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/
17. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services, The OWL Services Coalition
18. SweDE. An extendable framework for integrating various Semantic Web tools into the Eclipse development environment. http://projects.semwebcentral.org/
19. SWRL, A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, W3C
20. UML Profile for Modeling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance Characteristics and Mechanisms, OMG Adopted Specification
21. Uschold M., and Gruninger M. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11 2 (1996)
22. M. Uschold, M. King, Towards a methodology for building Ontologies, AIAI-TR-183, July 1995
23. V. Cortellessa, How far are we from the definition of a common software performance ontology? in: ACM Proceedings WOSP'05, 2005, pp. 195-204
24. X.H. Wang, D.Q. Zhang, T. Gu, H.K. Pung, Ontology Based Context Modeling and Reasoning using OWL, Institute for Infocomm Research, Singapore
25. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/
26. XML Schema Part2: Datatype Second Edition. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschem