Optimal contour integration: When additive algorithms fail

Neurocomputing

Volumn 69, Issue 10-12, 2006, Pages 1297-1300

  Schinkel, Nadja ^a   Pawelzik, Klaus R ^a   Ernst, Udo A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Association field; Illusion; Neural networks; Visual system

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER VISION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICS;

ASSOCIATION FIELD; OPTIMAL CONTOUR INTEGRATION; SALIENT CONTOUR; VISUAL SYSTEM;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NERVE CELL NETWORK; ORIENTING RESPONSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RELIABILITY; SENSORY NERVE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 33646095759     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.095     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Dayan P., and Yu A. IETE J. Res. 49 (2003) 171-182
2. Ernst U., Mandon S., Schinkel N., Pawelzik K., and Kreiter A. Dynamic Perception (Workshop of GI section 1.0.4). In: Ilg U.J., et al. (Ed). MPI for Biological Cybernetics (2004), Tübingen 211-216
3. Gilbert C.D., and Wiesel T.N. J. Neurosci. 9 (1989) 2432-2442
4. Li Z. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 10 (1999) 187-212
5. Li Z. Neurol. Comput. 13 (2001) 1749-1780
6. Mandon S., and Kreiter A.K. Vision Res. 45 (2005) 291-300
7. Mc Adams C.J., and Maunsell J.H.R. J. Neurosci. 19 (1999) 431-441
8. Mel B. J. Neurophysiol. 70 (1993) 1086-1101
9. Mumford D. In: Bajaj C.L. (Ed). Algebraic Geometry and its Applications (1994), Springer, New York 491-506
10. Salinas E., and Abbott L.F. J. Neurophysiol. 77 (1997) 3267-3272
11. Schinkel N., Pawelzik K., and Ernst U. Neurocomput. 65-66 (2005) 211-217
12. Usher M., Bonneh Y., Sagi D., and Herrmann M. Spatial Vision 12 2 (1999) 187-209
13. Williams L.R., and Thornber K.K. Neurol. Comput. 12 (2001) 1683-1711