Lidar target-strength measurements on Northeast Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus)

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 677-682

  Tenningen, Eirik ^a   Churnside, James H ^b   Slotte, Aril ^a   Wilson, James J ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MARINE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^b EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

lidar; mackerel; polarization; reflectivity; target strength

Indexed keywords

FISH; LIDAR; REFLECTIVITY; TARGET STRENGTH;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; ATLANTIC OCEAN (NORTHEAST);

SCOMBER SCOMBRUS;

EID: 33646069655     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aglen A. Sources of error in acoustic estimation of fish abundance. In: Fernø A., and Olsen S. (Eds). Marine Fish Behaviour Related to Capture and Abundance Estimation (1994), Fishing News Books, Oxford 107-133
2. Benigno J. A., and Kemmerer, D. J. 1973. Aerial photographic sensing of pelagic fish schools: a comparison of two films. American Society of Photogrammetry Symposium of Remote Sensing in the Ocean, Lake Buena Vista, Florida.
3. Cameron D.A., and Pugh E.N. Double cones as a basis for a new type of polarization vision in vertebrates. Nature 353 (1991) 161-164
4. Churnside J.H., and McGillivary P.A. Optical properties of several Pacific fishes. Applied Optics 30 (1991) 2925-2927
5. Churnside J.H., Sawada K., and Okumura T. A comparison of airborne lidar and echosounder performance in fisheries. Journal of the Marine Acoustical Society of Japan 28 (2001) 49-61
6. Churnside J.H., Wilson J.J., and Tatarski V.V. Lidar profiles of fish schools. Applied Optics 36 (1997) 6011-6020
7. Churnside J.H., Wilson J.J., and Tatarski V.V. Airborne lidar for fisheries application. Optical Engineering 40 (2001) 406-414
8. Korneliussen R.J., and Ona E. An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59 (2002) 291-313
9. Lewis G.D., Jordan D.L., and Roberts P.J. Backscattering target detection in a turbid medium by polarization discrimination. Applied Optics 38 (1999) 3937-3944
10. MacLennan D., and Simmonds E.J. Fisheries Acoustics (1991), Chapman & Hall, London
11. MacLennan D.N., Fernandes P.G., and Dalen J. A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59 (2002) 365-369
12. Misund O.A. Abundance estimation of fish schools based on relationship between school area and school biomass. Aquatic Living Resources 6 (1993) 235-241
13. Moody M.F., and Parriss J.R. Discrimination of polarized light by octopus. Nature 186 (1960) 839-840
14. Saidel W.M., Lettvin J.Y., and MacNichol E.F. Processing of polarized light by squid photoreceptors. Nature 304 (1983) 534-536
15. Shashar N., Hagan R., Boal J.G., and Hanlon R.T. Cuttlefish use polarization sensitivity in predation on silvery fish. Vision Research 40 (2000) 71-75
16. Shashar N., Hanlon R.T., and Petz A.D. Polarization vision helps detect transparent prey. Nature 393 (1998) 222-223
17. Shashar N., Rutledge P.S., and Cronin T.W. Polarization vision in cuttlefish - a concealed communication channel?. Journal of Experimental Biology 199 (1996) 999-1004
18. Vasilkov A.P., Goldin Y.A., Gureev B.A., Hoge F.E., Swift R.N., Wright C.W., Churnside J.H., and Wilson J.J. Airborne polarized lidar detection of scattering layers in the ocean. Applied Optics 40 (2001) 4353-4364