Involuntary civil commitment to outpatient treatment

Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry, 2Ed

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 116-120

  Miller, Robert D ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646060085     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Application of True, 103 Idaho 151 (Idaho 1982).
2. Birl v. Wallis, 619 F. Supp. 481 (M.D.Ala. 1985); 633 F. Supp. 707 (M.D.Ala. 1986).
3. Bleicher, B.K. 1967. Compulsory community care of the mentally ill. Cleveland-Marshall Law Review 16, 93-115.
4. Bursten, B. 1986. Posthospital mandatory outpatient treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry 143, 1255-8.
5. Chambers, D.L. 1972. Alternatives to civil commitment of the mentally ill: practical guides and constitutional imperatives. Michigan Law Review 70, 1107-1200.
6. Chu, F.D., Trotter, S. 1974: The Madness Establishment. New York: Grossman.
7. C.R. v. Adams, 649 F.2d 625 (8th Cir. 1981).
8. Dietrich v. Brooks, 558 P.2d (Or. App. 1976).
9. Geller, J.L. 1986. The quandaries of enforced community treatment and unenforceable outpatient commitment statutes. Journal ofPsychiatry and Law 14, 149-58.
10. Geller, J.L. 1990. Clinical guidelines for the use of involuntary outpatient treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry 41, 749-55.
11. Gerbasi, J.B., Bonnie, R.J., Binder R.L. 2000. Resource document on mandatory outpatient treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 28, 127-44.
12. Glasco v. Brassard, 483 P.2d 924 (1971).
13. Goldman, H.K., Adams, N.H., Taube, C.A. 1983. Deinstitutionalization: the data demythologized. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 24, 129-34.
14. Hiday, V.A., Goodman, R.R. 1982. The least restrictive alternative to involuntary hospitalization, outpatient commitment: its use and effectiveness. Journal of Psychiatry and Law 10, 81-96.
15. Hiday, V.A., Scheid-Cook, T.L. 1987. The North Carolina experience with outpatient commitment: a critical appraisal. International Journal ofLaw and Psychiatry 10, 215-32.
16. Hoge, M.A., Grottole, E. 2000. The case against outpatient commitment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 28, 165-70.
17. Hooks v. Jacquith, 318 So. 2d 860 (Miss. 1975).
18. In re Anderson, 73 Cal. 3d 98, 140 Cal. Rptr. 546 (1977).
19. In re Commitment of B.H., 212 N.J. Super. 145 (1986).
20. In re Cross, 662 P.2d 828 (Wash. 1983).
21. In re McPherson, 176 Cal. App. 3d 332, 222 Cal. Rptr. 416 (1985).
22. In re M.M., No. 17, 820-CW (La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. Dec. 13, 1985).
23. In re Richardson, 481 A.2d 473 (D.C. App. 1984).
24. Keilitz, I. 1990. Empirical studies of involuntary outpatient civil commitment: is it working? Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter 14, 368-79.
25. Knoedler, W. 1988. Outpatient commitment (letter). Hospital and Community Psychiatry 39, 783-4.
26. Lewis v. Donahue, 437 F. Supp. 112 (W.D. Okla. 1977).
27. Matter of Mental Condition of W.R.B., 411 N.W.2d 142 (Wis. App. 1987).
28. Matter of Mills, 467 A.2d 971 (D.C. App. 1983).
29. Mattison, E. 2000. Commentary: the law of unintended consequences. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 28, 154-8.
30. McCafferty, G., Dooley, J. 1990. Involuntary outpatient commitment: an update. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter 14, 277-87.
31. Meisel v. Kremens, 405 F. Supp. 1253 (E.D. Pa. 1975).
32. Meloy L.R., Haroun, A., Schiller, E.F. 1990: Clinical Guidelines for Involuntary Outpatient Treatment. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Exchange, Inc.
33. Metaxos v. People, 230 P. 608 (Colo. 1924).
34. Miller, R.D. 1982. The least restrictive environment: hidden agendas and meanings. Community Mental Health Journal 18, 46-55.
35. Miller, R.D. 1985. Commitment to outpatient treatment: a national survey. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 36, 265-7.
36. Miller, R.D. 1987: Involuntary Civil Commitment ofthe Mentally Ill in the Post-reform Era. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
37. Miller, R.D. 1988a. Outpatient civil commitment of the mentally ill: an overview and an update. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 6, 99-118.
38. Miller, R.D. 1988b. In reply (letter). Hospital and Community Psychiatry 39, 784.
39. Miller, R.D. 1990: Involuntary civil commitment. In Simon, R.I. (ed.), Annual Review of Clinical Psychiatry and the Law. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 95-172.
40. Miller, R.D. 1992. An update on involuntary civil commitment to outpatient treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 43, 79-81.
41. Miller, R.D., Fiddleman, P.B. 1983. Outpatient commitment: treatment in the least restrictive environment? Hospital and Community Psychiatry 35, 147-51.
42. Miller, R.D., Maher, R., Fiddleman, P.B. 1984. The use of plea bargaining in civil commitment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 7, 395-406.
43. Miller, R.D., Luskin, R.L., Starrett, D., et al. 1987: Involuntary Commitment to Outpatient Treatment. American Psychiatric Association Task Force Report 26. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
44. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972).
45. Mulvey, E.P., Geller, J.L., Roth, L.H. 1987. The promise and peril of involuntary outpatient commitment. American Psychologist 42, 571-84.
46. Munetz, M.R., Grande, T., Kleist J., et al. 1996. The effectiveness of outpatient civil commitment. Psychiatric Services 47, 1251-3.
47. Munetz, M.R., Geller, J.L., Frese F.J. III. 2000. Commentary: Capacity-based involuntary outpatient treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 28, 145-8.
48. New Jersey v. Carter, 64 N.J. 382 (1974).
49. Policy Research Associates, Inc. 1998: Final Report, Research Study of the New York City Involuntary Outpatient Commitment Pilot Program (unpublished), New York.
50. Rubenstein, L.R. 1985. APA's Model Law: hurting the people it seeks to help. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 36, 968-72.
51. Schmidt, M.L., Geller, J.L. 1990. Involuntary administration of medication in the community: the judicial opportunity. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 17, 283-92.
52. Schwartz, S.L., Costanzo, C.E. 1987. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values. Loyola (LA) Law Review 20, 1329-429.
53. Stein, L.I., Diamond, R.J. 2000. Commentary: A 'systems'-based alternative to mandatory outpatient treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 28, 159-64.
54. Swartz, M.S., Swanson, J.W., Wagner, H.R., et al. 1995. Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism? Findings from a randomized trial of severely mentally ill individuals. American Journal of Psychiatry 156, 1968-75.
55. Telson, H., Glickstein, R., Trujillo, M. 1999: Report ofthe Bellevue Hospital Center Outpatient Commitment Pilot Program (unpublished) New York.
56. Torrey, E.F., Kaplan, R.J. 1995. A national survey of the use of outpatient commitment. Psychiatric Services 46, 778-84.
57. Van Putten, R.A., Santiago, J.M., Berren, M.R. 1988. Involuntary outpatient commitment in Arizona: a retrospective study. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 39, 953-8.
58. Van Putten, T. 1974. Why do schizophrenic patients refuse to take their drugs. Archives ofGeneral Psychiatry 31, 67-72.
59. Zanni, G., DeVeau, L. 1986. A research note on the use of outpatient commitment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 37, 941-2.