Comparison of Two Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stems. Clinical, Functional, and Bone Densitometry Evaluation of Patients Randomized to a Regular or Modified Hydroxyapatite-Coated Stem Aimed at Proximal Fixation

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 344-352

  Sluimer, Judith C ^a   Hoefnagels, Nicolette H M ^a   Emans, Pieter J ^a   Kuijer, Roel ^a   Geesink, Rudolph G T ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

BMD; DEXA; hydroxyapatite; pain; proximal fixation

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PREDICTION; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE DENSITY; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 33646059484     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Geesink R.G.T. Osteoconductive coatings for total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 395 (2002) 53
2. D'Antonio J.A., Capello W.N., Manley M.T., et al. Hydroxyapatite femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty: 10- to 13-year followup. Clin Orthop 393 (2001) 101
3. McNally S.A., Shepperd J.A., Mann C.V., et al. The results at nine to twelve years of the use of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 (2000) 378
4. Oosterbos C.J., Rahmy A.I., and Tonino A.J. Hydroxyapatite coated hip prosthesis followed up for 5 years. Int Orthop 25 (2001) 17
5. Bobyn J.D., Mortimer E.S., Glassman A.H., et al. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (1992) 79
6. Geesink R., and Hoefnagels N. Eight years results of HA-coated primary total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Belg 63 Suppl 1 (1997) 72
7. Manley M.T., Capello W.N., D'Antonio J.A., et al. Fixation of acetabular cups without cement in total hip arthroplasty. A comparison of three different implant surfaces at a minimum duration of follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 (1998) 1175
8. Ardran G.M. Bone destruction not demonstrable by radiography. Br J Radiol 24 (1951) 107
9. Jasty M., Maloney W.J., Bragdon C.R., et al. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 (1991) 551
10. Rosenthall L., Bobyn J.D., and Tanzer M. Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling. Int Orthop 23 (1999) 325
11. Scott D.F., and Jaffe W.L. Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years. J Arthroplasty 11 (1996) 429
12. Dorr L.D., Faugere M.C., Mackel A.M., et al. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14 (1993) 231
13. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54 (1972) 61
14. Ilstrup D.M., Nolan D.R., Beckenbaugh R.D., et al. Factors influencing the results in 2,012 total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 95 (1973) 250
15. D'Aubigne R.M., and Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36-A (1954) 451
16. Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., and Amstutz H.C. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop (1979) 17
17. Engh C.A., Bobyn J.D., and Glassman A.H. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69 (1987) 45
18. Engh C.A., and Bobyn J.D. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (1988) 7
19. Tanner K.E., Yettram A.L., Loeffler M., et al. Is stem length important in uncemented endoprostheses?. Med Eng Phys 17 (1995) 291
20. Huiskes R., and van Rietbergen B. Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement. Clin Orthop (1995) 64
21. McAuley J.P., Sychterz C.J., and Engh Sr. C.A. Influence of porous coating level on proximal femoral remodeling. A postmortem analysis. Clin Orthop (2000) 146
22. Al Hertani W., Waddell J.P., and Anderson G.I. The effect of partial vs. full hydroxyapatite coating on periprosthetic bone quality around the canine madreporic femoral stem. J Biomed Mater Res 53 (2000) 518
23. Okano T., Hagino H., Otsuka T., et al. Measurement of periprosthetic bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry is useful for estimating fixation between the bone and the prosthesis in an early stage. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 49