Birth Father Rights and Legislative Interventions

Adoption Quarterly

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-5

  Finley, Gordon E ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646055849     PISSN: 10926755     EISSN: 1544452X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J145v06n01_01     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Amato, P. R. (1999). The post divorce society: How divorce is shaping the family and other forms of social organization. In R. A. Thompson and P. R. Amato (Eds.) The postdivorce family: Children, parenting, and society (pp. 161-190). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
2. Clapton, G. (2001). Birth fathers’ lives after adoption. Adoption and Fostering, (25) 4, 50-59.
3. Daly, K. J., & Sobol, M. P. (1997). Key issues in adoption legislation: A call for research. (pp. 145-157). In H. E. Gross & M. B. Sussman (Eds.). Families and adoption. New York: TheHaworth Press Inc.
4. Finley, G. E. (2002). The best interest of the child and the eye of the beholder. [Review of C. Panter-Brick & M. T. Smith (Eds.) Abandoned children]. Contemporary Psychology, APA REVIEW OF BOOKS, 47 (5), 629-631.
5. Sacks, G. & Thompson, D. (2002). Fathers deserve proper notification of their child’s pending adoption. The Washington Times, 8/22/02, A19.
6. Zill, N. (1991). U. S. Children and their families: Current conditions and recent trends, 1989. SRCD Newsletter, Winter, 1-3.