If college students are appointment television viewers

Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 446-463

  Pingree, Suzanne ^a   Hawkins, Robert P ^a   Bush Hitchon, Jacqueline C ^a   Gilligan, Eileen ^a   Radler, Barry ^a   Kahlor, Leeann ^a   Gorham, Bradley ^a   Kolbeins, Gudbjörg Hildur ^a   Schmidt, Toni ^a   Kannaovakun, Prathana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646051311     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4503_5     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abel, R. (1996). Can we generalize from Generation X? Not Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40(3), 441-446.
2. Barwise, T. P. & Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1988). Television and its audience. London: Sage.
3. Barwise, T. P., Ehrenberg, A. S. C, & Coodhardt, G. J. (1982) Glued to the box?: Patterns of TV repeal-viewing. Journal of Communication, 32(4), 22-29.
4. Basil, M. (1996). The use of student samples in communication research. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40(3), 431-440.
5. Biocca, F. A. (1988). Opposing conceptions of the audience: The active and passive hemispheres of mass communication theory. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 11 (pp. 51-80). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Chaffee, S. & Mutz, D. (1988). Comparing mediated and interpersonal communication. In R. Havvkins, J. Wiemann, & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1988.
7. Courtright, J. A. (1996). Rationally thinking about nonprobability. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40(3), 414-421.
8. Dervin, B. (1980). Communication gaps and inequities: Moving toward a reconceptualization. In B. Dervin & M. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences, Vol. 2. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
9. Eastman, S. T., Newton, G. D., Riggs, K. E., & Neal-Lunsford, J. (1997). Accelerating the flow: A transition effect in programming theory? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41(2), 265-283.
10. Eastman, S. T., Neal-Lunsford, J., & Riggs, K. E. (1995). Coping with grazing: Prime-time strategies for accelerated program transitions. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 39, 92-108.
11. Elder, G. H. Jr., & O'Rand, A. M. (1995). Adult lives in a changing society. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
12. Ferguson, D. A. & Perse, E. M. (2000). The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44(2), 155-174.
13. Frank, R. E., Becknell, J., & Clokey, J. (1971 ). Television program types. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 204-211.
14. Gensch, D. H. & Ranganathan, B. (1974). Evaluation of television program content for the purposes of promotional segmentation. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 390-398.
15. Gerbner, G., Gross, L, Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In Bryant, J. & Zillmann, D. (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C, & Collins, M. A. (1987). The television audience: Patterns of viewing, an update. England: Cower House.
17. Hawkins, R. P. & Pingree, S. (1986). Activity in the effects of television on children. In J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on Media Effects. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S. & Reynolds, N. (1991). In search of viewing styles. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35(3), 375-383.
19. Hirsch, P. M. (1980). The 'scary world' of the nonviewer and other anomalies: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings of cultivation analysis. Communication Research, 7(4), 403-456.
20. Katz, E. (1996). Viewers work. In J. Hay, L. Grossberg, & E. Wartella (Eds.), The audience and its landscape (pp. 9-21). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21. Krotz, F. & Hasebrink, U. (1998). The analysis of people-meter data: Individual patterns of viewing behavior and viewers' cultural backgrounds. Communications, 25(2), 151-174.
22. Kubey, R. (1986). Television use in everyday life: Coping with unstructured time. Journal of Communication, 36(3), 108-123.
23. Kubey, R. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Television and the quality of life: How viewing shapes everyday experience. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Lang, A. (1996). The logic of using inferential statistics with experimental data from nonprobability samples: Inspired by Cooper, Dupagne, Potter, and Sparks. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40(3), 422-430.
25. Litman, B. R. & Kohl, L. S. (1992). Network rerun viewing in the age of new programming services. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 383-391.
26. Livingstone, S. (1991). The resourceful reader: Interpreting television characters and narratives. Communication Yearbook, 15, 58-90.
27. Lometti, G. & Addington, T. (1992, August). Testing opposing views of the audience: How the active television viewer selects programs. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Montreal, Canada.
28. A.C. Nielsen Company. (1997). Nielsen Station Index, Viewers in Profile. (Pamphlet) Madison, Wl.
29. O'Keefe, G. J., & Spetnagel, H. T. (1973). Patterns of college students' use of selected news media. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 543-548.
30. Palmgreen, P., Wenner L. A., & Rosengren, K. E. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: The past ten years. In Rosengren, Wenner & Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research: Current perspectives (pp. 11-40). Beverly Hills, CA., Sage.
31. Potter, W. J., Cooper, R., & Dupagne, M. (1993). The three paradigms of mass media research in mainstream communication. Communication Theory, 3(4), 317-335.
32. Potter, W. )., Cooper, R., & Dupagne, M. (1995). Reply to Sparks' critique. Communication Theory, 5, 280-386.
33. Potts, R., Dedmon, A., & Haiford, J. (1996). Sensation seeking, television viewing motives, and home television viewing patterns. Personality and Individual Difference, 21, 1081-1084.
34. Preston, J. M. & Clair, S. A. (1994). Selective viewing: Cognition, personality and television genres. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 273-288.
35. Rao, V. R. (1975). Taxonomy of television programs based on viewing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 355-358.
36. Reimer, B. & Rosengren, K. E. (1990). Cultivated viewers and readers: A life-style perspective, In N. Signorielli & M. Morgan, (Eds.), Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Rosenstein, A. W. & Grant, A. E. (1997). Reconceptualizing the role of habit: A new model of television audience activity. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 324-344.
38. Rouner, D. (1984). Active television viewing and the cultivation hypothesis. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 168-173.
39. Rubin, A. (1984). Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34(3), 67-77.
40. Rubin, A. M. (1985). Uses of daytime television soap opera by college students. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 29, 241-258.
41. Rubin, A. M. (1994). Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. In. J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 417-436). Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Sparks, G. (1995). Comments concerning the claim that mass media research is "prescientific": A response to Potter, Cooper, and Dupagne. Communication Theory, 5, 273-280.
43. Tangney, J. P. (1988). Aspects of the family and children's television viewing content preferences. Child Development, 59, 1070-1079.
44. Vincent, R. C. & Basil, M. D. (1997). College students' news gratifications, media use and current events knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41(3) 380-392.
45. Webster, J. G. & Newton, G. D. (1988). Structural determinants of the television news audience. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 32(4), 381-389.
46. Webster, J. G. & Phalen, P. F. (1997). The mass audience: Rediscovering the dominant model. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum.
47. Webster, J. G. & Wakshlag, J. J. (1983). A theory of television program choice. Communication Research, 10, 430-46.
48. Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J. (1985). Selective exposure to communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J. (1994). Entertainment as media effect. In J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 417-436). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.