Modeling impacts of response method and capability on oil spill costs and damages for Washington State spill scenarios

2005 International Oil Spill Conference, IOSC 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 11005-11011

  Etkin, Dagmar Schmidt ^a   McCay, Deborah French ^b   Rowe, Jill ^b   Whittier, Nicole ^b   Sankaranarayanan, Sankar ^b   Pilkey Jarvis, Linda ^c  

^a Environmental Research Consulting   (United States)

^b Applied Science Associates Inc   (United States)

^c Spill Prevention Preparedness Response Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COASTAL ZONES; CODES (STANDARDS); COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CRUDE PETROLEUM; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

OIL RECOVERY; OIL SPILL TRAJECTORY; US COAST GUARD (USCG);

OIL SPILLS;

EID: 33646041307     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Alan A. Allen, Spiltec, Inc., Woodinville, WA. 2004. Personal communication. 21 January 2004.
2. Allen, A.A., and R.J. Ferek, 1993. Advantages and disadvantages of burning spilled oil. Proc. 1993 International Oil Spill Conference: pp. 765-772.
3. American Petroleum Institute (API), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), US Coast Guard (USCG), and US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 2001. Characteristics of Response Strategies: A Guide for Spill Response Planning in Marine Environments. API, NOAA, USCG, US EPA Joint Publication, June 2001, 80 pp.
4. American Petroleum Institute (API), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), US Coast Guard (USCG), and US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Characteristics of Response Strategies: A Guide for Spill Response Planning in Marine Environments. Joint Publication of API, NOAA, USCG, USEPA, June 2001, 80 pp.
5. Etkin, D.S. 2001. Comparative methodologies for estimating on-water response costs for marine oil spills. Proc. 2001 International Oil Spill Conference: pp: 1,281-1,289.
6. Etkin, D.S. 2003. Estimation of shoreline response cost factors. Proc. 2003 International Oil Spill Conf.: pp. 1,243-1,253.
7. Etkin, D.S., D. French McCay, J. Jennings, N. Whittier, S. Subbayya, W. Saunders, and C. Dalton. 2003. Financial implications of hypothetical San Francisco bay oil spill scenarios: Response, socioeconomic, and natural resource damage costs. Proc. 2003 International Oil Spill Conf: pp. 1,317-1,325.
8. Etkin, D.S., D. French-McCay, N.Whittier, S. Subbayya, and J. Jennings 2002. Modeling of response, socioeconomic, and natural resource damage costs for hypothetical oil spill scenarios in San Francisco Bay. Proc. 25th Arctic & Marine Oilspill Program Tech. Sem.: pp. 1,075-1,102.
9. Fingas, M. and M. Punt. 2000. In-situ Burning: A Cleanup Technique for Oil Spills on Water. Emergencies Science Division, Environmental Technology Centre, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 214 pp.
10. French-McCay, D., and J.R. Payne. 2001. Model of oil fate and water concentrations with and without application of dispersants. Proc. 24th Arctic & Marine Oilspill Program Tech. Sem: pp.611-645.
11. French-McCay, D., M. Reed, K. Jayko, S. Feng, H. Rines, S. Pavignano, T. Isaji, S. Puckett, A. Keller, F. W. French III, D. Gifford, J. McCue, G. Brown, E. MacDonald, J. Quirk, S. Natzke, R. Bishop, M. Welsh, M. Phillips and B.S. Ingram. 1996. The CERCLA Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Model for Coastal and Marine Environments (NRDAM/CME). Technical Documentation, Vol. I-VI, Final Report. Contract No. 14-0001-91-C-11, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Washington, DC.
12. French Mc-Cay, D., J.J. Rowe, N. Whittier, S. Sankaranarayanan, D.S. Etkin. 2004. Estimation of potential impacts and natural resource damages of oil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 107: pp. 11-25.
13. French-McCay, D., J. Rowe, N.Whittier, S. Sankaranarayanan, D.S. Etkin, and L. Pilkey-Jarvis. 2004. Evaluation of the consequences of various response options using modeling of mate, effects and NRDA costs of oil spills into Washington waters. Proc. 2005 International Oil Spill Conference: [this volume]
14. French-McCay, D., N.Whittier, S. Subbayya, J. Jennings, and D.S. Etkin. 2002, Modeling fates and impacts for bio-economic analysis of hypothetical oil spill scenarios in San Francisco Bay. Proc. 25th Arctic & Marine Oilspill Program Tech. Sem.: pp. 1,051-1,074.
15. Gregory, C.L., A.A. Allen, and D.H. Dale. 1999. Assessment of potential oil spill recovery capabilities. Proc. 1999 International Oil Spill Conference: pp. 527-534.
16. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 1995. Habitat Equivalency Analysis: An Overview. NOAA Damage Assessment and Restoration Program. Department of Commerce.
17. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1997. Oil Spill Response & Planning: In Situ Burning. NOAA, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington, USA.
18. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 1998. Spill Tools: Dispersant Mission Planner. NOAA, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington, USA.
19. Northwest Area Committee. 2003. Northwest Area Contingency Plan 2003 (and Region 10 Regional Contingency Plan). Prepared by US Coast Guard 13th District, US Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Regional Response Team, Marine Safety Office Puget Sound, Marine Safety Office Portland, Washington Department of Ecology, Idaho Bureau of Hazardous Materials, and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. 1 February 2003.
20. US Coast Guard, 1999. Response Plan Equipment Caps Review: Draft report. August 1999. US Coast Guard Commandant, Office of Response, Washington, DC.
21. US Coast Guard. 1996. Vessel Response Plans: Final Rule. Federal Register Vol. 61 (9): pp. 1,052-1,108. 12 January 1996.
22. US Coast Guard. 2002. Vessel and Facility Response Plans for Oil: 2003 Removal Equipment Requirements and Alternative Technology Revisions: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Federal Register Vol. 67 (198): pp. 63,331-63,452. 11 October 2002.
23. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2003. Environmental Protection Agency National Contingency Plan Product Schedule. US EPA, Washington, DC. November 2003.