A classification of Dutch manufacturing based on a model of innovation

Economist

Volumn 154, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 85-105

  Raymond, Wladimir ^a   Mohnen, Pierre ^a   Palm, Franz ^a   van der Loeff, Sybrand Schim ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CIS; Industry classification; Innovation policy; Two limit tobit model

Indexed keywords

HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE; INNOVATION; NUMERICAL MODEL;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33646033113     PISSN: 0013063X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10645-006-0005-z     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J.R. Baldwin G. Gellatly 2000 'A Firm-based Approach to Industry Classification: Identifying the Knowledge-based Economy' L.A. Lefebvre E. Lefebvre P. Mohnen Doing Business in a Knowledge-Based Economy, Facts and Policy Challenges Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston, Mass
2. E. Brouwer A.H. Kleinknecht 1996 'Determinants of Innovation: A Micro Econometric Analysis of Three Alternative Innovative Output Indicators' A.H. Kleinknecht Determinants of Innovation: The Message from New Indicators Macmillan London
3. B. Crépon E. Duguet J. Mairesse 1998 'Research and Development, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level' Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7 115-158
4. Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997), 'Revision of the High-technology Sector and Product Classification,' Working Paper.
5. H. Hollenstein 1996 'A Composite Indicator of a Firm's Innovativeness An Empirical Analysis Based on Survey Data for Swiss Manufacturing' Research Policy 25 633-645 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00874-8
6. Janz, N., H. Loöf and B. Peters (2003), 'Firm Level Innovation and Productivity: Is There a Common Story Across Countries,' ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 03-26
7. Janz, N. and B. Peters (2002), 'Innovation and Innovation Success in the German Manufacturing Sector: Econometric Evidence at Firm Level,' ZEW Working Paper.
8. L. Klomp G. Leeuwen van 2001 'Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach' International Journal of the Economics of Business 8 343-364
9. S. Lach 2002 'Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D' Journal of Industrial Economics 50 369-390 10.1111/ 1467-6451.00182
10. G.S. Maddala 1983 Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics Cambridge University Press Cambridge
11. J. Mairesse P. Mohnen 2001 'To Be or Not to Be Innovative: An Exercise in Measurement' STI Review Special Issue on New Science and Technology Indicators 27 103-129
12. P. Mohnen M. Dagenais 2001 'Towards an Innovation Intensity Index. The Case of C is 1 in Denmark and Ireland A. Kleinknecht P. Mohnen Innovation and Firm Performance: Econometric Explorations of Survey Data Palgrave London
13. OECD 1997 OECD Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Oslo Manual 2 OECD Paris
14. OECD 1998 Technology, Productivity and Job Creation: Best Policy Practices OECD Paris
15. OECD 1999 Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies. OECD Paris
16. K. Pavitt 1984 'Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory' Research Policy 13 343-373 10.1016/ 0048-7333(84)90018-0
17. Raymond, W., P. Mohnen, F. Palm and S. Schim van der Loeff (2004), 'An Empirically-based Taxonomy of Dutch Manufacturing: Innovation Policy Implications,' CESifo Working Paper, No. 1230.
18. R.N. Rosett 1959 'A Statistical Model of Friction in Economics' Econometrica 27 141-146
19. A. Thomas 2000 Econométrie des Variables Qualitatives Dunod Paris
20. van Leeuwen, G. (2002), 'Linking Innovation to Productivity Growth Using Two Waves of the Community Innovation Survey,' STI Working Paper.