Discovering relations between named entities from a large raw corpus using tree similarity-based clustering

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3651 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 378-389

  Zhang, Min ^a   Su, Jian ^a   Wang, Danmei ^a,b   Zhou, Guodong ^a   Tan, Chew Lim ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR INFOCOMM RESEARCH   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTICS;

CLUSTERING; ENTITY PAIRS; RELATION CLUSTERING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646008548     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11562214_34     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. MUC. 1987-1998. The nist MUC website: http://www.itl.nist.gov/iaui/894. 02/related_ projects/muc/
2. Miller, S., Fox, H., Ramshaw, L. and Weischedel, R. 2000. A novel use of statistical parsing to extract information from text. Proceedings of NAACL-00
3. Zelenko, D., Aone, C. and Richardella, A. 2003. Kernel Methods for Relation Extraction. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2003(2):1083-1106
4. Culotta, A. and Sorensen, J. 2004. Dependency Tree Kernel for Relation Extraction. Proceeding of ACL-04
5. Kambhatla, N. 2004. Combining Lexical, Syntactic, and Semantic Features with Maximum Entropy Models for Extracting Relations. Proceeding of ACL-04, Poster paper.
6. Agichtein, E. and Gravano, L. 2000. Snow-ball: Extracting Relations from Large Plaintext Collections. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries.
7. Stevenson, M. 2004. An Unsupervised WordNet-based Algorithm for Relation Extraction. Proceedings of the 4th LREC workshop "Beyond Named Entity. Semantic Labeling for NLP tasks"
8. Hasegawa, T., Sekine, S. and Grishman, R. 2004. Discovering Relations among Named Entities from Large Corpora. Proceeding of ACL-04
9. Vapnik, V. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley
10. Collins, M. and Duffy, N. 2001. Convolution Kernels for Natural Language. Proceeding of NIPS-01
11. Collins, M. and Duffy, N. 2002. New Ranking Algorithm for Parsing and Tagging: Kernel over Discrete Structure, and the Voted Perceptron. Proceeding of ACL-02.
12. Haussler, D. 1999. Convolution Kernels on Discrete Structures. Technical Report UCS-CRL-99-10, University of California
13. Lodhi, H., Saunders, C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Cristianini, N. and Watkins, C. 2002. Text classification using string kernel. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2002(2):419-444
14. Suzuki, J., Hirao, T., Sasaki Y. and Maeda, E. 2003. Hierarchical Directed Acyclic Graph Kernel: Methods for Structured Natural Language Data. Proceedings of ACL-03
15. Suzuki, J., Isozaki, H. and Maeda, E. 2003. Convolution Kernels with Feature Selection for Natural Language Processing Tasks. Proceedings of ACL-04
16. Moschitti, A. 2004. A study on Convolution Kernels for Shallow Semantic Parsing. Proceedings of ACL-04
17. Manning, C. and Schutze, H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. The MIT Press: 500-527
18. Collins, M. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Pennsylvania
19. Fellbaum, C. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database and some of its Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Sekine, S. 2001. OAK System (English Sentence Analysis). Http://nlp.cs.nvu.edu/oak
21. Sekine, S., Sudo, K. and Nobata, C. 2002. Extended named entity hierarchy. Proceedings of LREC-02
22. ACE. 2004. The Automatic Content Extraction (ACE) Projects, http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/ Projects/ACE/