Riparian forest buffer income opportunities: A hybrid poplar case study

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 159-163

  Henri, Carolyn J ^a   Johnson, Jon D ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Buffer; Crops; Farm; Income; Management; Poplar; Riparian; Water

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; HABITAT; INCOME; RIPARIAN FOREST; TIMBER HARVESTING; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

PISUM SATIVUM; VACCINIUM;

EID: 33646006406     PISSN: 00224561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bishaw, B., and W, Emmingham. 1998. The potential of hybrid poplar as a riparian buffer to provide shade to streams and other benefits to riparian areas. Pp. 74-77. In: Ecosystem Restoration: Turning the Tide. Society for Ecological Restoration Conference Seattle, Washington.
2. Bishaw, B., W. Emmingham, and W. Rogers. 2001. Establishment of riparian forest buffers on agricultural lands in the Oregon Coast Range: Beaver Creek case study. 7th Biennial Conference on Agroforestry in North America, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
3. Cooper, J.R., R.B. Daniels, W.P. Robarge, and J.W. Gilliam. 1987. Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51:416-420.
4. Dillaha, T.A., R.B. Reneau, S. Mostaghimi, and D. Lee. 1989. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control. Transaction of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 32(2):513-519.
5. Eaton, J. 2003. Potlatch Hybrid Poplar Program, Boardman, Oregon. Personal communication with Jon Johnson, May 21, 2003.
6. Groffman, P.M., E.A. Axelrod, J.L. Lemonyon, and W.M. Sullivan. 1991. Denitrification in grass and forest vegetated filler strips. Journal of Environmental Quality 20:671-674.
7. Haycock, N.E. and G. Pinay. 1993. Groundwater nitrate dynamics in grass and poplar vegetated riparian buffer strips during the winter. Journal of Environmental Quality 22(2):273-278.
8. Heilman P.E., R.F. Stettler, D.P. Hanley, and R.W. Carkner. 1995. High Yield Poplar Plantations in the Pacific Northwest. PNW Extension Bulletin No. 356. Revised Addition. Washington State University Co-op Extension, Pullman, Washington. 42 pp.
9. Hill, A.R. 1990. Groundwater cation concentrations in the riparian zone of a forested headwater stream. Hydrological Processes 4:121-130.
10. Hubbard, R. K. and R. Lowrance. 1997. Assessment of forest management effects on nitrate removal by riparian buffer systems. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 40(2):383-391.
11. Jacobs, T.C. and J.W. Gilliam. 1985. Riparian losses of nitrate from agricultural drainage waters. Journal of Environmental Quality 14:472-478.
12. Johnson, J. 2002. Unpublished equations from DOE SBIR subcontract to Broadacres Nursery: Carbon Sequestration by Hybrid Poplar in the Pacific Northwest.
13. Knutson, K.L. and V.L. Naef. 1997. Management recommendations for Washington's priority habitats: Riparian. Olympia, Washington, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 181.
14. Licht, L.A. 1992. Sallicaceae family trees in sustainable agroecosystems. The Forestry Chronicle 68(2):214-217.
15. LogLines. 2004. March, Mt. Vernon, Washington.
16. Lowrance, R., R. Leonard, and J. Sheridan. 1985. Managing riparian ecosystems to control nonpoint pollution. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 40(2):87-91.
17. Lowrance, R., R. Todd, J. Fail, Jr., O. Hendrickson, Jr., R. Leonard, and L. Asmussen. 1984. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds. BioScience 34:374-377.
18. Lowrance, R.R. 1992. Groundwater nitrate and denitrification in a coastal plain riparian forest. Journal of Environmental Quality 21:401-405.
19. Mater Engineering, Ltd. 1998. Marketing study for a multi-region plantation hybrid poplar project: Final Report. December.
20. Merwin, M., M. Powers, B. Bishaw, and D. Brodie. 1999. Biological, economic, and public policy aspects of agroforestry enterprises combined with riparian buffers on farmland in Western Oregon. Sixth North American Agroforestry Conference, Hot Springs, Arizona.
21. Muskat, A.D., G.L. Harris, S.W. Bailey, and D.B. Davies. 1993. Buffer zones to improve water quality: A review of their potential use in UK agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 45:59-77.
22. Nuss, J. Greenwood Resources, Portland, Oregon. Personal Communication with Carolyn Henri, July 26, 2004.
23. Omernik, J.M., A.R. Abernathy, and L.M. Male. 1981. Stream nutrient levels and proximity of agricultural and forest land to streams: Some relationships. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 36(6):227-231.
24. Oregon State University Extension Service, Oregon Agricultural Budgets http://oregonstate.edu/Dept/EconInfo/ent_budget/results.cfm?Region=WV, website accessed May 15, 2004.
25. Peterjohn, W.T. and D.L. Correll. 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65:1466-1475.
26. Pinay, G. and H. Decamps. 1988. The role of riparian woods in regulating nitrogen fluxes between the alluvial aquifer and surface water: A conceptual model. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 2:507-516.
27. Sheridan, J.M., R. Lowarance, and D.D. Bosch. 1999. Management effects on runoff and sediment transport in riparian forest buffers. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 42(1):55-64.
28. Schuette, B. 2003. Broadacres Nursery, Inc, Hubbard, Oregon. Personal Communication, 12, June, 2003.
29. Shelby, M. 2003. Western Washington Agricultural Association, Mt. Vernon, Washington. Personal Communication with Carolyn Henri, June 3, 2003.
30. Tjaden, R. and J. Klapworth. 1998. Real and potential income opportunities for riparian areas. Pp. 199-208. In: Natural Resource Income Opportunities on Private Lands. J. Kays (ed.) University of Maryland Cooperative Extension Service, College Park, Maryland.
31. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2000. The relation of fish community composition to riparian cover and runoff potential in the Minnesota River Basin, Minnesota and Iowa, 1997.
32. Washington State Conservation Commission (WSCC). 1999. Salmon and steelhead habitat limiting factors, WRIA5, Stillaguamish Watershed. Olympia, Washington State Conservation Commission.
33. Washington State Conservation Commission (WSCC). 2003. Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Annual Report.