Influence of crosshead speed on micro-tensile bond strength of two-step adhesive systems

Dental Materials

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 420-425

  Yamaguchi, Kanako ^a   Miyazaki, Masashi ^a   Takamizawa, Toshiki ^a   Tsubota, Keishi ^a   Rikuta, Akitomo ^a  

^a NIHON UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Composite; Crosshead speed; Dentin; Micro tensile bond strength

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION ANALYSIS; BONDING; ETCHING; RESINS; TENSILE TESTING;

CROSSHEAD SPEED; DENTIN; MICRO-TENSILE BOND STRENGTH;

ADHESIVES;

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CLEARFIL AP X; CLEARFIL AP-X; CLEARFIL SE BOND; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CATTLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 33645996030     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.031     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Perdigão J., and Lopes M. Dentin bonding: questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1 (1999) 191-209
2. Tay F.R., and Pashley D.H. Dental adhesives of the future. J Adhes Dent 4 (2002) 91-103
3. Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Vargas M., Vijay P., et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28 (2003) 215-235
4. Nakabayashi N. Bonding of restorative materials to dentine: the present status in Japan. Int Dent J 35 (1985) 145-154
5. Pashley D.H., Sano H., Ciucchi B., Yoshiyama M., and Carvalho R.M. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11 (1995) 117-125
6. Miyazaki M., Oshida Y., and Xirouchaki L. Dentin bonding system. Part I: literature review. Biomed Mater Eng 6 (1996) 15-31
7. Pashley D.H., Carvalho R.M., Sano H., Nakajima M., Yoshiyama M., and Shono Y. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1 (1999) 299-309
8. Retief D.H. Standardizing laboratory adhesion tests. Am J Dent 4 (1991) 231-236
9. Söderholm K.-J.M. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: a report of the ASC MD156 Task Group on Test Methods for the Adhesion of Restorative Materials. Dent Mater 7 (1991) 74-83
10. Sudsangiam S., and van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose?. J Adhes Dent 1 (1999) 57-67
11. Van Noort R., Cardew G.E., Howard I.C., and Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 70 (1991) 889-893
12. Versluis A., Tantbirojn D., and Douglas W.H. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin?. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 1298-1307
13. Van Noort R., Noroozi S., Howard I.C., and Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 17 (1989) 61-67
14. Oshida Y., and Miyazaki M. Dentin bonding system. Part II: effect of crosshead speed. Biomed Mater Eng 6 (1996) 87-100
15. Van Meerbeek B., Willems G., Celis J.P., Roos J.R., Braem M., Lambrechts P., et al. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72 (1993) 1434-1442
16. Hara A.T., Pimenta L.A., and Rodrigues Jr. A.L. Influence of cross-head speed on resin-dentin shear bond strength. Dent Mater 17 (2001) 165-169
17. Evans A.G. Slow crack growth in brittle materials under dynamic loading conditions. Int J Fract 10 (1974) 251-259
18. Ban S., and Anusavice K.J. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res 69 (1990) 1791-1799
19. Baran G.R., Mccool J.I., Boberick K.G., and Zhang H.-Q. Size effect in resin/glass composite flexure strengths. J Oral Rehab 26 (1999) 775-780
20. Hu X.-Z. An asymptotic approach to size effect on fracture toughness and fracture energy of composites. Eng Fract Mech 69 (2002) 555-564
21. Sano H., Shono T., Sonoda H., Takatsu T., Ciucchi B., Carvalho R., et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength: evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10 (1994) 236-240
22. Phrukkanon S., Burrow M.F., and Tyas M.J. Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater 14 (1998) 120-128
23. Phrukkanon S., Burrow M.F., and Tyas M.J. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 14 (1998) 212-221
24. Goracci C., Sadek F.T., Monticelli F., Cardoso P.E., and Ferrari M. Influence of substrate, shape, and thickness on microtensile specimens' structural integrity and their measured bond strengths. Dent Mater 20 (2004) 643-654
25. Nakamichi I., Iwaku M., and Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res 62 (1983) 1076-1081
26. Fowler C.S., Swartz M.L., Moore B.K., and Rhodes B.F. Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater 8 (1992) 265-269
27. Schilke R., Bauß O., and Lisson J.A. Bovine dentin as a substitute for human dentin in shear bond strength measurements. Am J Dent 12 (1999) 92-96
28. DeHoff P.H., Anusavice K.J., and Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 11 (1995) 126-131
29. Wakasa K. Calculation models for average stress and plastic deformation zone size of bonding area in dentine bonding systems. Dent Mater J 14 (1995) 152-165
30. Wiskott H.W.A., Nicholls J.I., and Belser U.C. Stress fatigue: basic principles and prosthodontic implications. Int J Prosthod 8 (1995) 105-116
31. Hsiao H.M., Daniel I.M., and Cordes E.D. Strain rate effects on the transverse compressive and shear behavior of unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater 33 (1999) 1620-1642