The human semantic web shifting from knowledge push to knowledge pull

International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 1-30

  Naeve, Ambjörn ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conceptual calibration; Human semantic web; Knowledge manifold; Knowledge pull; Knowledge push; Ontological engineering; SECI spiral of knowledge creation; Semantic collaboration; Semantic web; Unified language modeling; Value ontology

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE CREATIONS; KNOWLEDGE MANIFOLD; KNOWLEDGE PULL; KNOWLEDGE PUSH; ONTOLOGICAL ENGINEERING; UNIFIED LANGUAGE;

CALIBRATION; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 33645990091     PISSN: 15526283     EISSN: 15526291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jswis.2005070101     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. BizTalk. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.microsoft.com/biztalk/ techinfo/BizTalkFramework20.doc
2. Blomqvist, U., Handberg, L., & Naeve, A. (2003). New methods for focusing on students' learning process and reflection in higher education. In Proceedings of the 28th IUT (Improving University Teaching) Conference, Växjö, May.
3. Concept maps. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.graphic.org/concept.html
4. Confolio. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.confolio.org
5. Conzilla. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.conzilla.org
6. Demo-editor. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://knowgate.nada.kth.se:8180/ SHAME/DemoEditor.jsp
7. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://dublincore.org
8. ebXML. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ebxml.org
9. ECIMF (Electronic Commerce Integration Meta-Framework). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ecimf.org
10. Edutella. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://edutella.jxta.org
11. ELF (E-Learning Framework). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www. elframework.org
12. e-Europe. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/information- society/eeurope/index-en.htm
13. Grace, A. & Butler, T. (2005). Learning management systems: A new beginning in the management of learning and knowledge. IJKL, 1 (1-2).
14. Gruber, T. (2004). Every ontology is a treaty - A social agreement - Among people with some common motive in sharing. AIS SIGSEMIS Bulletin, 1 (3).
15. Ind, N. (Ed.). (2003). Beyond branding: How the new values of transparency and integrity are changing the world of brands. Kogan Page Limited.
16. JXTA. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.jxta.org
17. KMR (Knowledge Management Research) group. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth.se
18. LOM-RDF-binding. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth.se/el/ims/ metadata.html
19. Mortensen, T. & Walker, J. (2002). Blogging thoughts: Personal publication as a research tool. Retreived from http://www.intermedia.uio.no/ konferanser/skikt-02/docs/Researching-ICTs-in-context-Ch11-Mortensen-Walker.pdf
20. Naeve, A. (1997). The garden of knowledge as a knowledge manifold: A conceptual framework for computer supported subjective education. Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, KTH, Stockholm. Retrieved from http://cid.nada.kth.se/sv/pdf/cid-17.pdf
21. Naeve, A. (1999). Conceptual navigation and multiple scale narration in a knowledge manifold. Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science. Retrieved from http://cid.nada.kth.se/sv/pdf/cid-52.pdf
22. Naeve, A. (2001a). The concept browser: A new form of knowledge management tool. In Proceedings of the Second European Web-Based Learning Environment Conference (WBLE 2001), Lund, Sweden, October 24-26 (pp. 151-161). Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth.se/papers/ConceptualBrowsing/ConceptBrowser. pdf
23. Naeve, A. (2001b). The knowledge manifold: An educational architecture that supports inquiry-based customizable forms of e-learning. In Proceedings of the Second European Web-Based Learning Environment Conference (WBLE 2001), Lund, Sweden, October 24-26 (pp. 200-212). Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth.se/ papers/ConceptualBrowsing/ConceptBrowser.pdf
24. Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., & Palmér, M. (2001). The conceptual Web: Our research vision. In Proceedings of the First Semantic Web Working Symposium, Stanford, California, July. Retrieved from http://www.semanticweb. org/SWWS/program/position/soi-nilsson.pdf
25. Naeve, A. et al. (2002). En publik elärandeplattform byggd på kunskapsmångfalder, öppen källkod och öppna IT-standarder (A public e-learning platform based on knowledge manifolds, open source and open, international ICT standards). Report to the Swedish Netuniversity. November 2002. Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth.se/papers/SemanticWeb/Natuniv- KMR.pdf
26. Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Palmér, M., & Paulsson, F. (2005). Contributions to a public e-learning platform: Infrastructure, architecture, frameworks and tools. International Journal of Learning Technology, 1 (3), 352-381.
27. Nejdl, W. et al. (2001). PADLR (Personalized Access to Distributed Learning Repositories). Proposal to WGLN. Retrieved from www.learninglab.de/pdf/ L3S-padlr-17.pdf
28. Nejdl, W. et al. (2002). Edutella: A P2P networking infrastructure based on RDF. In Proceedings of the 11th World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2002), Hawaii, May 7-11. Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth.se/papers/SemanticWeb/p597-nejdl. pdf
29. Nilsson, M., Naeve, A., & Palmér, M. (2004). The Edutella P2P network: Supporting democratic e-learning and communities of practice. In R. McGreal (Ed.), Online education using learning objects . New York: Routledge-Falmer.
30. Nilsson, M., Palmér, M., & Naeve, A. (2002). Semantic Web metadata for elearning: Some architectural guidelines. In Proceedings of the 11th World Wide Web Conference, Hawaii, May 7-11. Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth.se/papers/SemanticWeb/p744-nilsson.pdf
31. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Norris, D., Mason, J., & Lefrere, P. (2003). Transforming e- knowledge . Ann Arbor, MI: Society for College and University Planning.
33. Novak, J.D. (n.d.). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Retrieved from http://cmap.coginst.uwf.edu/info/
34. Odell & Martin. (1998). Object-oriented methods: A foundation . Prentice Hall.
35. OWL (Web Ontology Language). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/ owl-features
36. Palmér, M. & Naeve, A. (2005). Conzilla: A conceptual interface to the semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2005), Kassel, July 18-22, to appear in Springer.
37. Palmér, M., Naeve, A., & Paulsson, F. (2004). The SCAM-framework: Helping applications to store and access metadata on the semantic Web. In Proceedings of the First European Semantic Web Symposium, Heraklion, Greece, May. Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth.se/papers/ SemanticWeb/SCAM-ESWS.pdf
38. Paquet, S. (n.d.). Personal knowledge publishing and its uses in research. Retrieved from http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/stories/2002/10/03/ personalKnowledgePublishingAndItsUsesInResearch.html
39. Pettersson, D. (2000). Aspect filtering as a tool to support conceptual exploration and presentation. CID/NADA/ KTH. Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth. se/papers/ConceptualBrowsing/AspectFiltering-exjobb.pdf
40. Poincaré, H. (1905, 1952). Science and hypothesis. New York: Dover Publishing.
41. Powell, A., Nilsson, M., Naeve, A., & Johnston, P. (2004). DCMI: Abstract Model (working draft). Retrieved from http://dublincore.org/documents/ abstract-model
42. Prolearn. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.prolearn-project.org
43. RDF (Resource Description Framework). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/RDF
44. RDFS (RDF-Schema). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema
45. RosettaNet. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.rosettanet.org
46. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobsson, I., & Booch, G. (1999). The unified modeling language reference mannual . Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
47. Sakai. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.sakaiproject.org
48. SCAM. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://scam.sourceforge.net
49. Seb's Open Research. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://radio.weblogs.com/ 0110772
50. Semantic Web Initiative. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.SemanticWeb.org
51. SHAME. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth.se/shame
52. SIGSEMIS. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.sigsemis.org
53. Smith, J.W.T. (1999, April). The deconstructed journal: A new model for academic publishing. Learned Publishing, 12 (2). Retrieved from http://library.kent.ac.uk/library/papers/jwts/d-journal.htm
54. Takeuchi, H. & Nonaka, I. (2004). Hitotsubashi on knowledge management. Wiley & Sons.
55. Topicmaps. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.topicmaps. net and http://www.topicmaps.org
56. UDBL (Uppsala Data Base Laboratory). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.dis.uu.se/~udbl
57. ULL (Uppsala Learning Lab). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ull.uu.se
58. UML (Unified Modeling Language). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.uml.org
59. UN/CEFACT. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/cefact
60. VWE (Virtual Workspace Environment). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.vwe.nu
61. WGLN (Wallenberg Global Learning Network). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.wgln.org
62. Wilson, S. (2001, September). The next wave: CETIS interviews Mikael Nilsson about the Edutella project. Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards (CETIS). Retrieved from http://kmr.nada.kth.se/ papers/SemanticWeb/TheNextWave.pdf
63. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.