The role of wrap around services in retention and outcome in substance abuse treatment: Findings from the wrap around services impact study

Addictive Disorders and their Treatment

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 109-118

  Pringle, Janice L ^a   Edmondston, Lois A ^a   Holland, Cynthia L ^a   Kirisci, Levent ^a   Emptage, Nicholas P ^b   Balavage, Valerie K ^c   Ford, William E ^d   Etheridge, Rose M ^e   Hubbard, Robert L ^e   Jungblut, Edith ^f   Henell, James M ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Novum Inc   (United States)

^d Health Systems Research Inc   (United States)

^e NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

^f Center for Substance Abuse Treatment   (United States)

Author keywords

Substance abuse treatment retention; Treatment outcomes; Wrap around services

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD CARE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; EDUCATION; FAMILY HEALTH; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

EID: 33645987061     PISSN: 15315754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00132576-200211000-00001     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Gerstein DR, Harwood HJ, eds. Treating drug problems: a study of the evolution, effectiveness, and financing of public and private drag treatment systems. Vol. 1. Report of the Committee for the Substance Abuse Coverage Study, Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
2. Westermeyer J, Eames SL, Nugen S. Comorbid dysthymia and substance disorder: treatment history and cost. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:1556-1560.
3. Ford L, Snowden LR, Walser EJ. Outpatient mental health and the dual-diagnosis patient: utilization of services and community adjustment. Eval and Prgrm Planning 1991;14:291-298.
4. McLellan AT, Alterman AI, Metzger DS, et al. Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: role of treatment services. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994;62:1141-1158.
5. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Fletcher BW, et al. Treatments for cocaine addiction: a national evaluation of outcomes. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;56:507-514.
6. Wolfish S, Massey R, Krone A. MMPI profiles of cocaine-addicted individuals in residential treatment: implications for practical treatment planning. J Subst Abuse Treat 1990;7:151-154.
7. Wallen MC, Weiner HD, Mansi A, et al. Utilization of 12-step theme groups in a short-term chemical dependency unit. J Psychoactive Drugs 1987;19:287-290.
8. Ashery RS. Case management community advocacy for substance abuse clients. NIDA Res Monogr 1992;127:383-394.
9. Milby JB, Schumacher JE, Raczynsk JM, et al. Sufficient conditions for effective treatment of substance abusing homeless persons. Drug Alcohol Depend 1996;43:39-47.
10. McLellan AT, Hagan TA, Levine M, et al. Supplemental social services improve outcomes in public addiction treatment. Addiction 1998;93:1489-1499.
11. Piatt JJ, Widman M, Lidz V, et al. The case for support services in substance abuse treatment. Am Behav Sci 1998;41:1050-1062.
12. Florentine R. Effective drug abuse treatment: testing the distal needs hypothesis. J Subst Abuse Treat 1998;15:281-289.
13. Moss S, Ford W, Jacquard K, et al. Contracting for managed substance abuse and mental health services: a guide for public purchasers. Rockville, MD: CSAT Technical Assistance Publication Series 22; 1998.
14. Flynn PiM, Craddock SG, Hubbard, RL, et al. Methodological overview and research design for the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997:11:230-243.
15. National Opinion Research Center. National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Survey: Final Report to Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Chicago, IL; 1997.
16. Hubbard RL, Craddock SG, FIynn PM, et al. Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997;11:261-278.
17. Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Minnetonka, MN: NCS Assessments, 1993.
18. Dawson D, Room R. Towards agreement on ways to measure and report drinking patterns and alcohol-related problems in adult general population surveys: the Skarpo Conference overview. J Subst Abuse 2000;12:1-21.
19. Pennsylvania Department of Health. Pennsylvania Client Placement Criteria for Adults. 2nd ed. Harrisburg, PA; 1999.
20. Morrison DF. Multivariate Statistical Methods. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1976.
21. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, et al. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1998.
22. Pringle JL. Emptage NP. Case-mix adjustment in community-based substance abuse outcomes evaluation. Paper presented at: Conference of Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; November 1999; Washington, DC.
23. McLellan AT, Woody GE, Metzger D, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatments: reasonable expectations, appropriate comparisons. Milbank Q 1996;74:51-85.
24. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and clinical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51:1173-1182.
25. Joe GW, Simpson D, Broome KM. Retention and patient engagement for different treatment modalities in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1990;57(2):113-125.
26. Joe GW, Simpson DD, Hubbard RL. Treatment predictors of tenure in methadone maintenance. J Subst Abuse 1991;3:73-84.
27. Valliant GE. What can long-term follow-up teach us about relapse and prevention of relapse in addiction? Brit J Addict 1988;83:1147-1157.
28. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Assessment and treatment of patients with coexisting mental illness and alcohol and other drug abuse. Rockville, MD: 1999. CSAT Treatment Improvement Protocol Series.
29. Ball JC, Ross AR. The effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment: patients, programs, services, and outcome. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1991.
30. McGee MD, Mee-Lee, D. Rethinking patient placement: the human services matrix model for matching services to needs. J Subst Abuse Treat 1997;14:141-148.
31. Bazzoli GJ, Shortell SM, Dubbs N, et al. A taxonomy of health networks and systems: bringing order out of chaos. Health Serv Res 1999;33:1683-1717.
32. Etheridge RM, Craddock SG. Dunteman G, et al. Treatment services in two national studies of community-based drug abuse treatment programs. J Subst Abuse 1995;7:9-26.
33. Etheridge RM. Final report: Systems assessment of the Wrap Around Services Impact Study (WASIS). In: WASIS Research Group, Wrap Around Services Impact Study: Final report of findings. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2000. Publication SA1-SA373.
34. Leshner A. Science-based views of drug addiction and its treatment. JAMA 1999;282:1314-1316.
35. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Changing the Conversation: The National Treatment Plan Initiative (2000). Rockville, MD; 2000.