The case of the female orgasm

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 294-298

  Zuk, Marlene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILDENAFIL;

CLITORIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; ORGASM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SATISFACTION; SEXUALITY;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; ORGASM;

EID: 33645982559     PISSN: 00315982     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2006.0035     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Alcock, J. 1987. Ardent adaptationism. Natural History 87(4):4.
2. Baker, R. R., and M. A. Bellis. 1993a. Human sperm competition: Ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Anim Behav 46:861-85.
3. Baker, R. R., and M. A. Bellis. 1993b. Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Anim Behav 46:887-909.
4. Baker, R. R., and M. A. Bellis. 1995. Human sperm competition. London: Chapman & Hall.
5. Gould, S. J. 1987. Freudian slip. Natural History 87 (2): 14-21.
6. Hrdy, S. B. 1981. The woman that never evolved. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
7. Hrdy, S. B. 1996. The evolution of female orgasms: Logic please but no atavism. Anim Behav 52:851-52.
8. Longino, H. E. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
9. Symons, D. 1979. The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
10. Tavris, C. 1992. The mismeasure of woman. New York: Simon and Schuster.
11. Zuk, M. 2002. Sexual selections: What we can and can't learn about sex from animals. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.