On exploiting agent technology in the design of peer-to-peer applications

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3601 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 98-107

  Willmott, Steven ^a   Pujol, Josep M ^a   Cortés, Ulises ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; DECISION MAKING; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS; FILE EDITORS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

BUSINESS TEAMWARE; FILE SYSTEMS; PEER-TO-PEER ARCHITECTURES; REAL WORLD SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 33645977768     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11574781_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Adar, E. and Huberman, B. A.: Free Riding on Gnutella Technical Report Xerox Laboratories, 2000, Internet Ecologies Area. http://www.hpl.hp.com/ research/idl/papers/gnutella/gnutella.pdf
2. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T. and McBurney, P.: PARMENIDES: Facilitating democratic debate. Third e-Government Conference (EGOV04), DEXA 2004, Zaragoza, Spain, September 2004. Published in: R. Traunmuller (Editor): Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
3. Biswas, A., Sen, S. and Debnath, S.: Limiting Deception in a Group of Social Agents Applied Artificial Intelligence, 14:785-797, 2000.
4. Conitzer, V. and Sandholm, T.: Complexity of Manipulating Elections with Few Candidates. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 14:785-797, 2000. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2003.
5. Conitzer, V., Lang, J, and Sandholm, T.: How Many Candidates Are Needed to Make Elections Hard to Manipulate? Applied Artificial Intelligence, 14:785-797, 2000. In Proceedings of the Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), Bloomington, Indiana, 2003.
6. Chen, H., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Perich, F., Chakraborty, D. and Kagal, L.: Intelligent Agents Meet the Semantic Web in Smart Spaces IEEE Internet Computing, to appear, 2004.
7. Damianou, N., Dulay, N., Lupu, E. and Sloman, M.: The Ponder Policy Specification Language Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1995.
8. Dash, R., Jennings, N., and Parkes, D.: Mechanism Design: A Call to Arms Computational, IEEE Intelligent Systems, November 2003, pages 40-47 (Special Issue on Agents and Markets).
9. Dignum, F.: Autonomous Agents with Norms Artificial Intelligence and Law 7:69-79, 1999.
10. Dung, P.: On the acceptability of Arguments and its fundamental role in the Non-monotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and N-Person Games Artificial Intelligence 77, 2, pp 321-358, 1995.
11. Fitzmaurice, G.W., Ishii, H. and Buxton, W.: Bricks: Laying the Foundations for Graspable User Interfaces CHI, pp 442-449, 1995.
12. Jennings, N. R.: Controlling Cooperative Problem Solving in Industrial Multi-Agent Systems using Joint Intentions Artificial Intelligence 75, pp 195-240, 1995.
13. Jurca, R. and Faltings, B.: Towards Incentive-Compatible Reputation Management. Trust, Reputation and Security: Theories and Practice, Lecture Notes in AI 2631, 2003, pp. 138-147.
14. Luck, M., McBurney, P. and Preist, C.: Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing January 2003, ISBN 0854 327886. http://www.agentlink.org/ roadmap/index.html
15. Kraus, S., Nirkhe M. and Sycara, K.P.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model (Preliminary report) Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Hidden Valley, Pennsylvania, pp 233-247, 1993.
16. Panchoco, O and Carmo, O.: A role based model for normative specification of organised collective agency and agent interaction JAAMAS 6(2):145-183, 2003.
17. Parsons, S., Sierra, C. and Jennings, N.: Agents that Reason and Negotiate by Arguing Journal of Logic and Computation, 8, 3, pp 261-292, 1998.
18. Parsons, S., McBurney, P. and Wooldridge, M.: The mechanics of some formal inter-agent dialogues F. Dignum (Editor): Advances in Agent Communication. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2922. pp 329-348. Berlin, Springer, g
19. Sandholm, T.: Automated mechanism design: A New Application Area for Search Algorithms In Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP), 2003.
20. Shoham, Y. and Tenneholz, M.: On the synthesis of useful Social Laws for Agent Societies. In proceedings AAAI-92, pp 276-281, 1992