Integrating language understanding agents into the semantic web

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-05-01, Issue , 2005, Pages 17-24

  Java, Akshay ^a   Finin, Tim ^a   Nirenburg, Sergei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTIC WEBS; WEB-BASED REPRESENTATIONS;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 33645968411     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Beltran-Ferruz, P.; ez Caler, P.; and P.Gervas. 2004. Converting frames into OWL: Preparing Mikrokosmos for linguistic creativity. In LREC Workshop on Language Resources for Linguistic Creativity.
2. Beltran-Ferruz, P.; Gonzalez-Caler, P.; and P.Gervas. 2004. Converting Mikrokosmos frames into description logics. In RDF/RDFS and OWL in language Technology: 4th ACL Workshop on NLP and XML.
3. Cost, R. S.; Finin, T.; Joshi, A.; Peng, Y; Nicholas, C.; Soboroff, I.; Chen, H.; Kagal, L.; Perich, F.; Zou, Y; and Tolia, S. 2002. ITtalks: A Case Study in the Semantic Web and DAML+OIL. IEEE Intelligent Systems Special Issue.
4. Dameron, O.; Rubin, D. L.; and Musen, M. A. 2005. Challenges in converting frame-based ontology into OWL: the Foundational Model of Anatomy case-study. In American Medical Informatics Association Conference AMIA05.
5. Dejing Dou, D. M., and Qi, P. 2002. Ontology translation by ontology merging and automated reasoning. In Proc. EKAW Workshop on Ontologies for Multi-Agent Systems.
6. Ding, L.; Finin, T.; Joshi, A.; Pan, R.; Cost, R. S.; Peng, Y.; Red-divari, P.; Doshi, V. C.; and Sachs, J. 2004. Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.
7. The friend of a friend(foaf) project. http://www.foaf-project.org/.
8. Grishman, R., and Sundheim, B. 1996. Message understanding conference-6: a brief history. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics, 466-471.
9. Hobbs, J. R., and Pan, F. 2004. An ontology of time for the semantic web. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Processing (TALIP) 3(1):66-85. Special issue on Temporal Information Processing.
10. Hogue, A., and Karger, D. R. 2005. Thresher: Automating the unwrapping of semantic content from the world wide web. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International World Wide Web Conference.
11. Horrocks, I.; Patel-Schneider, P. F.; Boley, H.; Tabet, S.; Grosof, B.; and Dean, M. 2004. Swrl: A semantic web rule language combining owl and ruleml. World Wide Web Consortium Specification.
12. Horrocks, I.; Patel-Schneider, P. F.; and van Harmelen, F. 2003. From shiq and rdf to owl: the making of a web ontology language. J. Web Sem. 1(1):7-26.
13. Institute for language and information technologies, http://ilit.xombc. edu/.
14. Java, A.; Finin, T.; and Nirenburg, S. 2006. Text understanding agents and the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
15. Kalyanpur, A.; Parsia, B.; and Hendler, J. 2005. A tool for working with web ontologies. In In Proceedings of the International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, volume I.
16. Krueger, W.; Nilsson, J.; Oates, T.; and Finin, T. 2004. Automatically Generated DAML Markup for Semistructured Documents. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer.
17. McBride, B. 2001. Jena: Implementing the RDF model and syntax specification. In Proceedings of the WWW2001 Semantic Web Workshop.
18. McGuinness, D. L., and van Harmelen, F. 2004. Owl web ontology language overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/#s3.4.
19. Miller, D. B. E., and Brickley, D. 2002. Expressing simple dublin core in RDF / XML. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Recommendation.
20. Muslea, I. A.; Minton, S.; and Knoblock, C. 2001. Hierarchical wrapper induction for semi structured information services. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 4(1/2):93-114.
21. Nirenburg, S., and Raskin, V. 2001. Ontological semantics, formal ontology, and ambiguity. In FOIS '01: Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, 151-161. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
22. Nirenburg, S., and Raskin, V. 2005. Ontological semantics. MIT Press.
23. 2004. OWL web ontology language for services (OWL-S). A W3C submission, http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/07/.
24. R.V.Guha, and McCool, R. 2003. TAP: A semantic web toolkit. Semantic Web Journal.
25. Schlangen, D.; Stede, M.; and Bontas, E. P. 2004. Feeding owl: Extracting and representing the content of pathology reports. In RDF/RDFS and OWL in Language Technology: 4th ACL Workshop on NLP and XML.
26. Semnews application, http://semnews.umbc.edu/.
27. RDF validation service. http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/.
28. Witbrock, M.; Panton, K.; Reed, S.; Schneider, D.; Aldag, B.; Reimers, M.; and Bertolo, S. 2004. Automated OWL Annotation Assisted by a Large Knowledge Base. In Workshop Notes of the 2004 Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation at the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference ISWC2004.
29. Wonderweb owl ontology validator. http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/ Validator.
30. 2004. Xml schema part 0: Primer. World Wide Web Consortium Specification, see http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema- 0/.