E-learning for depth in the semantic web

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 425-444

  Shafrir, Uri ^a,b   Etkind, Masha ^c,d  

^a Department of Human Development and Applied Psychology ^*  (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d Royal Architectural Institute of Canada   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING TOOLS; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS; PEDAGOGY; SEMANTIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; SEMANTICS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EDUCATION;

EID: 33645965617     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00614.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (2004). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Carnap, R. (1955). Logical foundations of the unity of science. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap & C. Morris (Eds), International encyclopedia of unified science Vol. 1, Nos. 1-5 (p. 42-62). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3. Einstein, A. & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics: from early concepts to relativity and quanta. New York: Simon and Schuster.
4. Etkind, M., Ripley, C., Shalit, R. & Shafrir, U. (2004, May). Instruction and assessment for deep comprehension. Teaching and Learning Conference, Panel Discussion, Ryerson University, Toronto.
5. Gribbin, J. (1999). Q is for quantum: particle physics from a to z. London: Orion Books.
6. Laurence, S. & Margolis, E. (1999). Concepts and cognitive science. In S. Laurence & E. Margolis (Eds), Concepts: core readings (pp. 3-81). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Naess, A. (1968). Four modern philosophers: Carnap; Wittgenstin; Heidegger; Sartre. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Ripley, C. & Etkind, M. (2004). Identifying conceptual thinking in history of architecture students. Paper presented at Learning and Teaching Conference, Ryerson University, Toronto.
9. Shafrir, U. (1999). Representational competence. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), The development of mental representation: theory and applications (pp. 371-389). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
10. Shafrir, U. & Etkind, M. (2005). Concept parsing algorithms: mapping the conceptual content of disciplines. Version 11.0 (January, 2005). Toronto: PARCEP.
11. Shafrir, U. & Krasnor, C. (2002). Increasing competitiveness of Ontario's material and manufacturing companies through enhanced training outcomes in pre-competitive skills. Resource Centre for Academic Technology, University of Toronto: Meaning Equivalence Design Studio.
12. Shafrir, U., Etkind, M. & Treviranus J. (in press). eLearning tools for ePortfolios. In A. Jaffari and C. Kauffman (Eds), Handbook of research on ePortfolios. Idea Group.
13. Shalit, R. (2005). Meaning equivalence tests for assessing deep comprehension of English spatial prepositions in college students (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Human Development and Applied Psychology, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of University of Toronto).
14. Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
15. Sigel, I. E. (1954). The dominance of meaning. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 85, 201-207.
16. Sigel, I. E. (1993). The centrality of a distancing model for the development of representational competence. In R. R. Cocking & K. A. Renninger (Eds), The development and meaning of psychological distance (pp. 141-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Sigel, I, E. (1999). Approaches to representation as a psychological construct: a treatise in diversity. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Development of mental representation (pp. 3-12). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Sternberg, R. J. & Williams, W. M. (2002). Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Togneri, R. & deSilva, C. J. S. (2002). Fundamentals of information theory and coding design. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.