Development of seismic force reduction and displacement amplification factors for autoclaved aerated concrete structures

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 267-286

  Varela, Jorge L ^a,b   Tanner, Jennifer E ^b,c   Klingner, Richard E ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE YUCATÁN   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^d The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYCLIC LOADS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SHEAR WALLS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; STRUCTURAL LOADS;

AUTOCLAVED AERATED CONCRETE STRUCTURES; CYCLIC LATERAL LOADS; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS MODELS; SEISMIC FORCE REDUCTION; SIMULATED GRAVITY;

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION;

AMPLIFICATION; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DISPLACEMENT; NUMERICAL METHOD; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; TESTING METHOD;

EID: 33645947000     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2166034     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Al-Shaleh, M., and Attiogbe, E. K., 1997. Flexural strength characteristics of non-load bearing masonry walls in Kuwait, Mater. Struct., 277-283, June 30.
2. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC, 2000. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, 2000 Edition, Part 2: Commentary, Washington, D.C.
3. CANNY Structural, 1999. CANNY 99, A 3-Dimensional Nonlinear Static/ Dynamic Structural Analysis Program, Vancouver, Canada.
4. Computers & Structures, Inc., 1999. SAP200 Nonlinear V7.10, Berkeley, CA.
5. de Vekey, R. C., Bright, N. J., Luckin, K. R., and Arora, S. K., 1986. Research results on autoclaved aerated concrete blockwork, Struct. Eng. 64a (11), 332-340.
6. Frankel, A., Muller, D., Barnhard, T., Perkins, D., Leyendecker, E. V., Dickman, N., Hanson, S., and Hopper, M., 1996. National Seismic Hazard Maps, Documentation, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Report 96-532, 100 pp.
7. International Code Council (ICC, 2000. International Building Code, 2000 Edition, Falls Church, VA.
8. Lai, S.-P., and Biggs, J. M., 1980. Inelastic response spectra for aseismic building design, J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 106 (ST6), 1295-1310.
9. Miranda, E., 1993. Site-dependent strength-reduction factors, J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 119 (12), 3503-3519.
10. Miranda, E., and Bertero, V., 1994. Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design, Earthquake Spectra 10 (2), 357-379.
11. Nassar, A. A., and Krawinkler, H., 1991. Seismic Demands for SDOF and MDOF Systems, Report No. 95, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
12. Riddell, R., Hidalgo, P., and Cruz, E., 1989. Response modification factors for earthquake resistant design of short period structures, Earthquake Spectra 5 (3), 571-590.
13. Somerville, P., Smith, N., Puntamurthula, S., and Sun, J., 1997. Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project, SAC Background Document SAC/DB-97/04, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, CA.
14. Tanner, J. E., 2003. Design Provisions for Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) Structural Systems, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin.
15. d factors for building seismic provisions, J. Struct. Eng. 117 (1), 19-28.
16. d Factors for the Seismic Design of AAC Structures, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin.
17. Wen, Y. K., and Wu, C. L., 1999. Generation of ground motions for mid-American cities, "Projects RR-1 and RR-2," Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.