Radon epidemiology: Continuous and categorical trend estimators when the exposure distribution is skewed and outliers may be present

Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A

Volumn 69, Issue 7-8, 2006, Pages 681-700

  Rosario, Angelika Schaffrath ^a,d   Wellmann, Jürgen ^a,b   Heid, Iris M ^a   Wichmann, H Erich ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d ROBERT KOCH INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASBESTOS; RADON; CARCINOGEN;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CANCER RISK; CIGARETTE SMOKING; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; TREND STUDY; AIR POLLUTANT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GERMANY; HOUSING; INDOOR AIR POLLUTION; LUNG TUMOR; RADIATION INJURY; RADIATION RESPONSE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AIR POLLUTANTS, RADIOACTIVE; AIR POLLUTION, INDOOR; CARCINOGENS, ENVIRONMENTAL; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; GERMANY; HOUSING; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEOPLASMS, RADIATION-INDUCED; RADON;

EID: 33645946029     PISSN: 15287394     EISSN: 10872620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15287390500261190     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aitchison, J., and Brown, J. A. C. 1969. The lognormal distribution - With special reference to its uses in economics, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Alavanja, M. C. R., Brownson, R. C., Lubin, J. H., Berger, E., Chang, J., and Boice, J. D., Jr. 1994. Residential radon exposure and lung cancer among nonsmoking women. JNCI 86:1829-1837.
3. Alavanja, M. C. R., Lubin, J. L., Mahaffey, J. A., and Brownson, R. C. 1999. Residential radon exposure and risk of lung cancer in Missouri. Am. J. Public Health 89:1042-1048.
4. Bofinger, E. 1970. Maximizing the correlation of grouped observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 65:1632-1638.
5. Brenner, H., and Blettner, M. 1997. Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 8:429-434.
6. Carroll, R. J., and Pederson, S. 1993. On robustness in the logistic regression model. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 55:693-706.
7. Cohen, J. 1983. The cost of dichotomization. Appl. Psych. Measure. 7:249-253.
8. Connor, R. J. 1972. Grouping for testing trends in categorical data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 67:601-604.
9. Copas, J. B. 1988. Binary regression models for contaminated data (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. B 50:225-265.
10. Cox, D. R. 1957. A note on grouping. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 19:543-549.
11. Field, R. W., Steck, D. J., Smith, B. J., Brus, C. P., Fisher, E. L., Neuberger, J. S., Platz, C. E., Robinson, R. A., Woolson, R. F., and Lynch, C. F. 2000. Residential radon gas exposure and lung cancer: The Iowa Radon Lung Cancer Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 151:1091-1102.
12. Figueiras, A., and Cadarso-Suárez, C. 2001. Application of nonparametric models for calculating odds ratios and their confidence intervals for continuous exposures. Am. J. Epidemiol. 154:264-275.
13. Greenland, S. 1995a. Avoiding power loss associated with categorization and ordinal scores in dose-response and trend analysis (Commentary). Epidemiology 6:450-454.
14. Greenland, S. 1995b. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: Alternatives to categorical analysis. Epidemiology 6:356-365.
15. Greenland, S. 1995c. Problems in the average-risk interpretation of categorical dose-response analyses. Epidemiology 6:563-565.
16. Greenland, S. 1995d. Previous research on power loss associated with categorization in dose-response and trend analysis (Letter). Epidemiology 6:641.
17. Haitovsky, Y. 1983. Grouped data. In Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, Vol 3, eds. S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson, pp. 527-536. New York: Wiley.
18. Heid, I. M., Küchenhoff, H., Schaffrath Rosario, A., Kreienbrock, L., and Wichmann, H. E. 2006. Impact of measurement error on German radon studies. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, this issue.
19. Hsieh, C. C., Maisonneuve, P., Boyle, P., Macfarlane, G. J., and Robertson, C. 1991. Analysis of quantitative data by quantiles in epidemiologic studies: Classification according to cases, noncases, or all subjects? Epidemiology 2:137-140.
20. Kreienbrock, L., Kreuzer, M., Gerken, M., Dingerkus, G., Wellmann, J., Keller, G., and Wichmann, H. E. 2001. Case-control study on lung cancer and residential radon in Western Germany. Am. J. Epidemiol. 153:42-52.
21. Künsch, H. R., Stefanski, L. A., and Carroll, R. J. 1989. Conditionally unbiased bounded-influence estimation in general regression models, with applications to generalized linear models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84:460-466.
22. Lagakos, S. W. 1988. Effects of mismodelling and mismeasuring explanatory variables on tests of their association with a response variable. Stat. Med. 7:257-274.
23. Lagarde, F., Pershagen, G., Akerblom, G., Axelson, O., Baverstam, U., Damber, L., Enflo, A., Svartengren, M., and Swedjemark, G. A. 1997. Residential radon and lung cancer in Sweden: risk analysis accounting for random error in the exposure assessment. Health Phys. 72:269-276.
24. Lubin, J. H., and Boice, J. D. 1997. Lung cancer risk from residential radon: Meta-analysis of eight epidemiologic studies. JNCI 89:49-57.
25. National Research Council 1999. Health effects of exposure to radon. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. BEIR VI report of the Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation.
26. Pershagen, G., Liang, Z. H., Hrubec, Z., Svensson, C., and Boice, J. D. 1992. Residential radon exposure and lung cancer in women. Health Phys. 63:179-186.
27. Pershagen, G., Akerblom, G., Axelson, O., Clavensjö, B., Damber, L., Desai, G., Enflo, A., Lagarde, F., Mellander, H., Svartengren, M., and Swedjemark, G. A. 1994. Residential radon exposure and lung cancer in Sweden. N. Engl. J. Med. 330:159-164.
28. Pregibon, D. 1982. Resistant fits for some commonly used logistic models with medical applications. Biometrics 38:485-498.
29. Royston, P., and Altman, D. G. 1994. Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling (with discussion). Appl. Stat. 43:429-467.
30. Royston, P., Ambler, G., and Sauerbrei, W. 1999. The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology. Int. J. Epidemiol. 28:964-974.
31. Ruckstuhl, A. F., and Welsh, A. H. 2001. Robust fitting of the binomial model. Ann. Stat. 29:1117-1136.
32. Selvin, S. 1987. Two issues concerning the analysis of grouped data. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 3:284-287.
33. Wang, C. Y., and Carroll, R. J. 1995. On robust logistic case-control studies with weights depending on the response. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 43:331-340.
34. Weinberg, C. R. 1995. How bad is categorization? (Editorial). Epidemiology 6:345-347.
35. Weinberg, C. R., Moledor, E. S., Umbach, D. M., and Sandler, D. P. 1996. Imputation for exposure histories with gaps, under an excess relative risk model. Epidemiology 7:490-497.
36. Wichman, H. E., Rosario, A. S., Heid, I. M., Kreuzer, M., Heinrich, J., and Kreienbrock, L. 2005. Increased lung cancer risk due to residential radon in a pooled and extended analysis of studies in Germany. Health Physics 88:71-79.
37. Zhao, L. P., and Kolonel, L. N. 1992. Efficiency loss from categorizing quantitative exposures into qualitative exposures in case-control studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 136:464-474.