Counselor educators and qualitative research: Affirming a research identity

Counselor Education and Supervision

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 2-16

  Reisetter, Marcy ^a   Korcuska, James S ^a   Yexley, Melinda ^b,c   Bonds, Deborah ^a,d   Nikels, Holly ^b,e   McHenry, William ^b,f  

^a Division of Counseling and Psychology in Education   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

^c Mount Marty College   (United States)

^d WAYNE STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

^e WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645942462     PISSN: 00110035     EISSN: 15566978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2004.tb01856.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adler, P. A., and Adler, P., (2002). Do university lawyers and the place define research values? In W. C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative research (pp. 34-42). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
2. Anderson, H., and Goolishian, H., (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S.McNamee & K. J.Gergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 25-39). London: Sage.
3. Astramovich, R., Baker, B., Okech, J., and Hoskins, W., (2002, October). Counselor educators’ perceptions of their training in research methods. Paper presented at the national conference of the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision, Park City, UT.
4. Bishop, R. M., and Bieschke, K. J., (1998). Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 182-188.
5. Campbell, C. A., and Robinson, E. H., (1990). The accountability and research challenge: Training future counselors. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 25, 72-79.
6. Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2001). The 2001 CACREP standards. Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http:www.counseling.orgsitePageServerpagenamecacrep_2001standards700.
7. Denzin, N., and Lincoln, Y., (1998). Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K.Denzin & Y. S.Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 1-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K.Denzin & Y. S.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Deyhle, D. L., Hess, G. A., Jr., & LeCompte, M. D., (1992). Approaching ethical issues for qualitative researchers in education. In M. D.LeCompte, W. L.Millroy, & J.Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 487-508). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Ely, M., (with Anzul, M., Freidman, T., Garner, D., and Steinmenz, A.). (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. London: Falmer Press.
11. Gelso, C. J., (1979). Research in counseling: Methodological and professional issues. The Counseling Psychologist, 8, 7-36.
12. Gladding, S. T., (2000). Counseling: A comprehensive profession (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
13. Granello, D. H., and Hazier, R. J., (1998). A developmental rationale for curriculum order and teaching styles in counselor education programs. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38, 89-106.
14. Granello, P. F., and Granello, D. H., (1998). Training counseling students to use outcome research. Counselor Education and Supervision, 37, 224-237.
15. Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S., (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Gubrium, J. F., and Holstein, J. A., (2000). Analyzing interpretive practice. In N. K.Denzin & Y. S.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 487-508). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Heppner, P. P., and Anderson, W. P., (1985). On the perceived non-utility of research in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 545-547.
18. Heppner, P. P., Kivlinghan, D. M., Jr., & Wampold, B. E., (1992). Research design in counseling. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19. Holland, J., (1986). Student selection, training, and research performance. The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 121-125.
20. Hoshmand, L. T., (1989). Alternative research paradigms: A review and teaching proposal. The Counseling Psychologist, 17, 3-79.
21. Lee, C. C., and Workman, D. J., (1992). School counselors and research: Current status and future direction. The School Counselor, 40, 15-19.
22. Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G., (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In Y. S.Lincoln & Y. E.Guba (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Locke, L. T., Spirduso, W. W., and Silverman, S. J., (2000). Proposals that work: A guide for planning dissertations and grant proposals (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Lundervold, D. A., and Belwood, M. F., (2000). The best kept secret in counseling: Single-case (N= 1) experimental designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 92-103.
25. McAuliffe, G., Eriksen, K., & Associates. (2000). Preparing counselors and therapists: Creating constructivist and developmental programs. Virginia Beach, VA: ACES.
26. McLeod, J., (2000). The contribution of qualitative research to evidence-based counseling and psychotherapy. In N.Rowands & S.Goss (Eds.), Evidence-based counseling and psychological therapies: Research and applications (pp. 112-126). London: Routledge.
27. McLeod, J., (2001). Qualitative research in counseling and psychotherapy. London: Sage.
28. Merchant, N., and Dupuy, P., (1996). Multicultural counseling and qualitative research: Shared worldview and skills. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 537-541.
29. Merriam, S. B., & Associates. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Moustakas, C., (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Okocha, A. A. G., (1998). Using qualitative appraisal strategies in career counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling, 35, 151-159.
32. Peterson, J. V., and Nisenholz, B., (1995). Orientation to counseling (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Ponterotto, J. G., and Grieger, I., (1999). Merging qualitative and quantitative perspectives in a research identity. In M.Kopala & L. A.Suzuki (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in psychology (pp. 49-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Rennie, D. L., (1999). Qualitative research: A matter of hermeneutics and the sociology of knowledge. In M.Kopala & L. A.Suzuki (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in psychology (pp. 3-14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Robinson, E. H., (1994). Critical issues in counselor education: Mentors, models, and money. Counselor Education and Supervision, 33, 339-344.
36. Royalty, G. M., and Magoon, T. M., (1985). Correlates of scholarly productivity among counseling psychologists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 458-461.
37. Royalty, G. M., and Reising, G. N., (1986). The research training of counseling psychologists: What the professionals say. The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 49-60.
38. Sciarra, D., (1999). The role of the qualitative researcher. In M.Kopala & L. A.Suzuki (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in psychology (pp. 37-48). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Seale, C., (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.
40. Shank, G. D., (2002). Qualitative research: A personal skills approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
41. Snyder, L., (2002). Confidentiality and anonymity: Promises and practices. In W. C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative research (pp. 70-78). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
42. Tinsley, D. J., Tinsley, H. E. A., Boone, S., and Shi-Li, C., (1993). Prediction of scientist-practitioner behavior using personality scores obtained during graduate school. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 511-517.
43. Tyron, G. S. (Ed.). (2002). Counseling based on process research: Applying what we know. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44. Weinberg, M., (2002). Biting the hand that feeds you and other feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In W. C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.). Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative research (pp. 34-42). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
45. Whitson, S. C., (1996). Accountability through action research: Research methods for practitioners. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 616-623.
46. Woolsey, L. K., (1986). Research and practice in counseling: A conflict of values. Counselor Education and Supervision, 26, 84-94.