Social inclusion and exclusion: Recategorization and the perception of intergroup boundaries

Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 245-264

  Dovidio, John F ^a   Gaertner, Samuel L ^b   Hodson, Gordon ^c   Houlette, Melissa A ^d   Johnson, Kelly M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d College of Mount St Joseph ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645937673     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203496176     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Abrams, D. (1985). Focus of attention in minimal intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 65-74.
2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom. New York: Longman.
4. Bachman, B. A. (1993). An intergroup model of organizational mergers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Newark, DE: University of Delaware.
5. Banker, B. S., & Gaertner, S. L. (1998). Achieving stepfamily harmony: An intergrouprelations approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 310-325.
6. Berry, J. W. (1984). Cultural relations in plural societies. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 11-27). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
7. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. S. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition: Vol. I: A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Brewer, M. B. (2000) Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization: Effects of multiple social identities. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 165-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact:The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). Orlando FL: Academic Press.
10. Brewer, M. B., von Hippel, W., & Gooden, M. P. (1999). Diversity and organizational entity: The problem of entrée after entry. In D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 337-363). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11. Brown, R. J., & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behavior: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 131-142.
12. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L, & Johnson, J. D. (1999, October). New directions in prejudice and prejudice reduction: The role of cognitive representations and affect. Symposium paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
13. Dovidio, J. F, Gaertner, S. L., & Kafati, G. (2000). Group identity and intergroup relations:The Common In-Group Identity Model. In S. R. Thye, E. J. Lawler, M. W. Macy, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 17, pp. 1-34). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
14. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Niemann, Y. F., & Snider, K. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and cultural differences in responding to distinctiveness and discrimination on campus:Stigma and common group identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 167-188.
15. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Validzic, A. (1998). Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 109-120.
16. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., & Frazier, S. (1997). Extending the benefits of re-categorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 401-420.
17. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York: Guilford.
18. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia, PA: The Psychology Press.
19. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-26). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Murrell, A. J., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reduction of intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
21. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Murrell, A. J., & Pomare, M. (1990). How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 692-704.
22. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Nier, J., Ward, C., & Banker, B. (1999). Across cultural divides: The value of a superordinate identity. In D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 173-212). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1996). The Contact Hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? (pp. 230-260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Hewstone, M. (1996). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Foundations of stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 323-368) New York: Guilford.
25. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the "Contact Hypothesis." In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
26. Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295-309.
27. Houlette, M., & Gaertner, S. L. (1999). The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Effects of inclusiveness of common ingroup identity and subgroup salience on ingroup bias. Unpublished data. Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
28. Howard, J. M., & Rothbart, M. (1980). Social categorization for in-group and out-group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 301-310.
29. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. H., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, A. E. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem. Is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
30. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Gaertner, L., Wildschut, T., Kozar, R., Pinter, B., Finkel, E. J., Brazil, D. M., Cecil, C. L., & Montoya, M. R. (2001). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 95-111.
31. Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived outgroup variability and outgroup attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710.
32. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2000). The three Cs of reducing prejudice and discrimination. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 239-268). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Johnson, K. M., Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2001). The effect of equality of job assignment on ingroup identity and bias for low and high status groups. Unpublished data, Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
34. Jones, J. M. (1997). Prejudice and racism (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H. L. K., & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism:Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 395-412.
36. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
37. Mullen, B., Dovidio, J. F., Johnson, C., & Copper, C. (1992). Ingroup-outgroup differences in social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 422-440.
38. Mullen, B., & Hu, L. T. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A metaanalytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.
39. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
40. Niemann, Y. F., & Dovidio, J. F. (1998). Relationship of solo status, academic rank, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethnic minorities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 55-71.
41. Otten, S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias:Affect-based spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 77-89.
42. Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051-1068.
43. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
44. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Justice and power: When will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 171-200.
46. Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25(4) 79-97.
47. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
48. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
49. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
50. van Oudenhoven, J. P., Prins, K. S., & Buunk, B. (1998). Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 995-1013.
51. Wilder, D. A. (1981). Perceiving persons as a group: Categorization and intergroup relations. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 213-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Worchel, S., Rothgerber, H., Day, E. A., Hart, D., & Butemeyer, J. (1998). Social identity and individual productivity with groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 389-413.