Seismic design method for reliabitiy-based rehabilitation of buildings

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 189-214

  Montiel, Marco A ^a   Ruiz, Sonia E ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENERGY DISSIPATION; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); RELIABILITY; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

ENERGY-DISSIPATING DEVICES; ENERGY-DISSIPATING PLATES; RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN METHOD; RELIABILITY-BASED REHABILITATION; SEISMIC DESIGN METHOD;

BUILDINGS;

BUILDING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ENERGY DISSIPATION; SEISMIC DESIGN; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 33645937288     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2162572     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2000. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
2. Barroso, L. R., and Winterstein, S., 2002. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of controlled steel moment-resisting frame structures, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (12), 2049-2066.
3. Bertero, R. D., and Bertero, V. B., 2002, Performance-based seismic engineering: The need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3), 627-652.
4. Complementary Technical Norms for Seismic Design, Mexico City Design Regulations (RCDF), 2004.
5. Cornell, C. A., 1996a. Calculating building seismic performance reliability: A basis for multilevel design norms, Proceedings, 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, Paper No. 2122, vol. 10, pp. 5707-5712.
6. Cornell, C. A., 1996b. Reliability-based earthquake-resistant design: The future, Proceedings, 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, Paper No. 2166.
7. Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A., 2002. The probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines, J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4), 526-533.
8. Ellinwood, B. R., Galambos, T. V., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A., 1982. Probability-based load criteria: Load factors and load combinations, J. Struct. Div. ASCE 108 (5), 978-997.
9. Esteva, L., Díaz, O., and García, J., 2001. Reliability functions for earthquake resistant design, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 73, 239-262.
10. Fajfar, P., and Krawinkler, H., 1997. Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 411 pp.
11. Hamburger, R. O., Foutch, D. A., and Cornell, C. A., 2003. Translating research to practice: FEMA/SAC performance-based design procedures, Earthquake Spectra 19 (2), 255-267.
12. Jalayer, F., and Cornell, C. A., 2003. A Technical Framework for Probability-Based Demand and Capacity Factor Design (DCFD) Seismic Formats, PEER Report 2003/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley.
13. Koh, H. M., Kim, J. K., and Ha, D. H., 1999. Progress of studies performed in Korea on design rules and cost evaluation in relation to base isolation techniques, Proceedings, International Post-SMIRT Conference Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Vibration of Structures, Cheju, Korea, pp. 209-222.
14. Montiel, M. A., 2006. Confiabilidad implícita en estructuras convencionales como base para establecer criterios para el diseño sísmico de estructuras reforzadas con disipadores de energía, Ph.D. thesis (in progress), National University of Mexico (in Spanish).
15. Montiel, M. A., Ruiz, S. E., and Rangel, G., 2006, Influence of parameter uncertainty on seismic reliability of building structures, submitted to Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
16. RCDF-1976. Reglamento de Construcciones del Distrito Federal, Gaceta Oficial. (in Spanish)
17. RCDF-2004. Reglamento de Construcciones del Distrito Federal, Gaceta Oficial. (in Spanish)
18. Rosenblueth, E., 1972. Code specifications of safety and serviceability, International Conference on Planning and Design of Tall Buildings, Structural Safety and Probabilistic Methods, Technical Committee 10, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, pp. 23-51.
19. SAC Joint Venture, 2000a. Recommended Post-Earthquake Evaluation and Repair Criteria for Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA-352, Washington, D.C.
20. SAC Joint Venture, 2000b. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA-350, Washington, D.C.
21. SAC Joint Venture, 2000c. Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA-351, Washington, D.C.
22. SAC Joint Venture, 2000d. State-of-the-Art Report on Performance Prediction and Evaluation of Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA-355F, Washington, D.C.
23. Shome, N., and Cornell, C. A., 1999. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Non-Linear Structures, Report No. RMS-35, RMS Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
24. Tena Colunga, A., 2000. Modelado analítico de edificios con disipadores de energía, Revista de Ingeniería Sísmica 62, 29-62 (in Spanish).
25. Tsai, K.-Ch., Chen, H.-W., Hong, Ch.-P., and Su, Y.-F., 1993. Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction, Earthquake Spectra 9 (3), 505-528.
26. Wen, Y. K., 1995. Building reliability and code calibration, Earthquake Spectra 11 (2), 269-296.
27. Wen, Y. K., 2001. Reliability and performance-based design, Struct. Safety 23, 407-428.