Putting professional learning Up front: A perspective of professional development within a context of collaborative research about curriculum leadership [1] [2]

Journal of In-Service Education

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 73-86

  Macpherson, Ian ^a   Brooker, Ross ^a   Aspland, Tania ^a   Elliott, Bob ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645925652     PISSN: 13674587     EISSN: 17475082     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13674589800200035     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aspland, T., Elliott, R., and Macpherson, I., Changing conceptions of professional development–impacts of national agendas, technology and curriculum decision-making. July1995. paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the Australian Curriculum Studies Association, Melbourne
2. Aspland, T., Elliott, R., and Macpherson, I., Using an NPDP experience to propose a changing conception of professional development. November1995. paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education conference, Hobart
3. Aspland, T., Macpherson, I., Proudford, C., and Whitmore, L., 1996a. Critical collaborative action research as a means of curriculum inquiry and empowerment. Educational Action Research, 4:93–104.
4. Aspland, T., Brooker, R., Macpherson, I., Proudford, C., and Kemmis, S., Insights into curriculum leadership:taking a narrative turn. November1996. paper presented at the joint Educational Research Association and Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Singapore
5. Aspland, T., Elliott, R., and Macpherson, I., 1997. Empowerment through professional development. Set:Research Information for Teachers, 1 New Zealand Council for Educational Research
6. Bailey, R., 1990. “ How to improve curriculum leadership–twelve tenets ”. In Tips for Principals from NASSP, Reston, VA:National Association of Secondary School Principals.
7. Brooker, R., Aspland, T., Macpherson, I., Jenkins, J., Woods, C., Elliott, R., Proudford, C., and Kemmis, S., Projecting to 1997–what still needs to be done? actions and on going research. November1996. paper presented at the joint Educational Research Association and Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Singapore
8. Brubaker, D., 1994. Creative Curriculum Leadership, Corwin Press. Thousand Oaks
9. Elliott, R., Aspland, T., Macpherson, I., and Lundin, R., Teachers' professional development by interactive satellite television:when national delivery is not national delivery. December1996. paper presented at the Second International Conference on Open Learning, Brisbane
10. Elliott, R., Brooker, R., Thurlow, G., and McInman, A., Insights into curriculum leadership:the state of the field. November1996. paper presented at the joint Educational Research Association and Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Singapore
11. Elliott, R., Brooker, R., Macpherson, I., McInman, A., and Thurlow, G., Curriculum leadership as mediated action. March1997. paper presented at the Annual PUTTING Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago
12. Elliott, R., Aspland, T., and Macpherson, I., 1997. Report of the 1996 CLARET Project, Centre for Leadership Excellence, Brisbane.
13. Greene, J., Caricelli, V., and Graham, W., 1989. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11:255–274.
14. Habermas, J., 1987. Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2. Lifeworld and System:a critique of functional reasoning, Boston:Beacon.
15. Hargreaves, A., 1995. “ Paradoxes of educational change ”. In Changing Times:structures for leadership in an age of paradox, Melbourne:Australian Council for Educational Administration.
16. Henderson, J., and Hawthorne, R., 1995. Transformative Curriculum Leadership, New York:Teachers' College Press.
17. Kemmis, S., 1995. Action Research and Communicative Action:changing teachers' practices and the organisation of educational work, paper presented to the National Forum of the Innovative Links Project, Melbourne
18. Macpherson, I., 1994. Thinking about and teaching curriculum. Curriculum and Teaching, 9 (2):45–57.
19. Macpherson, I., Aspland, T., and Elliott, R., 1995. Reshaping teachers' curriculum work:who's in control? The role of teacher education programs. Curriculum Perspectives, 15 (4):28–31.
20. Macpherson, I., Aspland, T., Brooker, R., Elliott, R., and Thurlow, G., Developing a Partnership and the concept of curriculum leadership for effective learning and teaching via an action research approach. 1996. paper presented at the joint Educational Research Association and Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Singapore
21. Macpherson, I., Aspland, T., and Brooker, R., 1993. Dilemmas in teachers' conceptualisation of the nature of their curriculum work:a Queensland case study. Curriculum Perspectives, 13 (3):11–22.
22. Owens, R., 1987. Organisation Behaviour in Education, London:Prentice Hall. 3rd edn
23. Pinar, W., 1992. Dreamt into existence by others:curriculum theory and school reform. Theory into Practice, 31:228–235.
24. School of Curriculum and Professional Studies. 1993. Review of Curriculum Studies and of Teaching Curriculum Studies in Higher Education, Brisbane:Queensland University of Technology. unpublished manuscript contributed to by R. Elliott, T. Aspland, S. Johnston, I. Macpherson, C. Proudford & H. Thomas
25. Smith, R., 1993. Potentials for empowerment in critical education research. Australian Educational Researcher, 20 (2):75–93.
26. Winter, R., 1982. Dilemma analysis:a contribution to methodology for action research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 12:166–173.
27. Winter, R., 1989. Learning from Experience:principles and practice of action research, London:Falmer Press.