Concept mapping, PowerPoint, and a pedagogy of access

Journal of Biological Education

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 79-83

  Kinchin, Ian M ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Affordances; Dialogue; ICT; University teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645911812     PISSN: 00219266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2006.9656018     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Atkinson, C. (2005) Beyond Bullet Points: Using Microsoft® PowerPoint® to create presentations that inform, motivate and inspire. Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington.
2. Chemero, A. (2003) An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2): 181-195.
3. Gibson, J.J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA. Houghton Mifflin.
4. Guskey, T.R. (2002) Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 8(3/4): 381-390.
5. Hay, D.B. (2007) Using concept maps to measure deep, surface and non-learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1): In Press.
6. th June, University of Surrey, UK.
7. Hendricks, H. and Quinn, L. (2000) Teaching referencing as an introduction to epistemological empowerment. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(4): 447-457.
8. Howard, B.C., McGee, S., Schwartz, N., and Purcell, S. (2000) The experience of constructivism: transforming teacher epistemology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4): 455-465.
9. Hughes, G. and Hay, D. (2001) Use of concept mapping to integrate the different perspectives of designers and other stakeholders in the development of e-learning materials. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5): 557-569.
10. Kinchin, I.M. (2000) Concept mapping in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2): 61-68.
11. Kinchin, I.M. (2001) Concept mapping and progression in the National Curriculum. Education Today, 51(3): 3-7.
12. Kinchin, I.M. (2003) Effective teacher-student dialogue: a model from biological education. Journal of Biological Education, 37(3): 110-113
13. Kinchin, I.M. and Alias, M. (2005) Exploiting variations in concept map morphology as a lesson-planning tool for trainee teachers in higher education. Journal of In-service Education, 32(2): 363-385.
14. Kinchin, I.M., Hay, D.B. and Adams, A. (2000) How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1): 43-57.
15. Kozma, R. (2003) The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2): 205-216.
16. Laurillard, D., Stratfold, M., Luckin, R., Plowman, L. and Taylor, J. (2000) Affordances for learning in a non-linear narrative medium. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 62: 1-19.
17. Mayer, R.E. (2001) Multimedia learning. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
18. Nicholls, G. (2002) Developing teaching and learning in higher education. London, Routledge Falmer.
19. Northedge, A. (2003a) Rethinking teaching in the context of diversity. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1): 17-32.
20. Northedge, A. (2003b) Enabling participation in academic discourse. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2): 169-180.
21. nd Edition) London, RoutledgeFalmer.
22. Shulman, L. (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57: 1-22.
23. Szabo, A. and Hastings, N. (2000) Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers and Education, 35: 175-187.
24. Tufte, E.R. (2003) The cognitive style of PowerPoint. Graphics Press LLC, Cheshire, CT.
25. th February 2006.
26. Webb, M.E. (2005) Affordances of ICT in science learning: implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6): 705-735.