The future of the perfusion record: Automated data collection vs. manual recording

Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 355-359

  Ottens, Jane ^a   Baker, Robert A ^b,c   Newland, Richard F ^b   Mazzone, Annette ^b  

^a Ashford Community Hospital   (Australia)

^b FLINDERS MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

^c FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary bypass; Computerized data collection; Data accuracy; Electronic data; Record keeping

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUTOMATION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL RECORD; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PERFUSION; PERFUSION PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA BASE; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; DATA COLLECTION; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; HUMANS; PERFUSION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33645911166     PISSN: 00221058     EISSN: 29698960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Cook RI, McDonald JS, Nunziata E. Differences between handwritten and automatic blood pressure records. Anesthesiology. 1989;71:385-90.
2. Thrush DN. Are automated anesthesia records better? J Clin Anesth. 1992;4:386-9.
3. Hollenberg JP, Pirraglia PA, Williams-Russo P, et al. Computerized data collection in the operating room during coronary artery bypass surgery: A comparison to the hand-written anesthesia record. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11:545-51.
4. Riley J. Electronic perfusion. AmSECT Today. 2004;7:6-7.