Gender differences in the perceptions of wildlife management objectives and priorities in Australasia

Wildlife Research

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 155-159

  Miller, Kelly K ^a   Jones, Darryl N ^b  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE BEHAVIOR; MALE BEHAVIOR; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT; WORKING CONDITIONS;

AUSTRALASIA;

EID: 33645895888     PISSN: 10353712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/WR05036     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Angus, S. (1995). Women in natural resources: stimulating thinking about motivations and needs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23, 579-582.
2. Anthony, M. L., Knuth, B. A., and Lauber, T. B. (2004). Gender and citizen participation in wildlife management decision making. Society & Natural Resources 17, 395-411. doi:10.1080/08941920490430179
3. Beilin, R. (1995). The construction of woman in Landcare: does it make a difference? Rural Society 5, 20-29.
4. Bjerke, T., Reitan, O., and Kellert, S. R. (1998). Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway. Society & Natural Resources 11, 169-178.
5. Brown, T. L., Decker, D. J., and Enck, J. W. (1992). 'The Wildlife Society Membership Survey.' (Human Dimensions Research Unit, Cornell University: Ithaca, NY.)
6. Brown, T. L., Enck, J. W., Decker, D. J., and Frankin, T. M. (1994). The Wildlife Society: its members evaluate its services. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22, 503-510.
7. Campbell, A., and Siepen, G. (1994). 'Landcare: Communities Shaping the Land and the Future.' (Allen & Unwin: Sydney.)
8. Claridge, C. L. (1998). Rural women, decision making and leadership within environmental and landcare groups. Rural Society 8, 183-195.
9. Davidson, P., and Black, R. (2001). Women in natural resource management: finding a more balanced perspective. Society & Natural Resources 14, 645-656.
10. Decker, D. J., Brown, T. L., and Siemer, W. F. (2001). 'Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management in North America.' (The Wildlife Society: Bethesda, MD.)
11. Kellert, S. R., and Berry, J. K. (1987). Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin 15, 363-371.
12. Kennedy, J. J. (1991). Integrating gender diverse and interdisciplinary professionals into traditional U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service culture. Society & Natural Resources 4, 165-176.
13. Lauber, T. B., Anthony, M. L., and Knuth, B. A. (2001). Gender and ethical judgments about suburban deer management. Society & Natural Resources 14, 571-583. doi:10.1080/089419201750341871
14. Mankin, P. C., Warner, R. E., and Anderson, W. L. (1999). Wildlife and the Illinois public: a benchmark study of attitudes and perceptions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 465-472.
15. Miller, K. K., and Jones, D. N. (2005). Wildlife management in Australasia: perceptions of objectives and priorities. Wildlife Research 32, 265-272. doi:10.1071/WR04042
16. Miller, K. K., and McGee, T. K. (2000). Sex differences in values and knowledge of wildlife in Victoria, Australia. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5, 54-68.
17. Sanborn, W. A., and Schmidt, R. H. (1995). Gender effects on views of wildlife professionals about wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23, 583-587.
18. Tindall, D. B., Davies, S., and Mauboules, C. (2003). Activism and conservation behavior in an environmental movement: the contradictory effects of gender. Society & Natural Resources 16, 909-932.