Hysteresis in solar wind power input to the magnetosphere

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

  Palmroth, Minna ^a   Janhunen, Pekka ^a,b   Pulkkinen, Tuija I ^a,c  

^a FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYSTERESIS; IONOSPHERE; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETOSPHERE;

INTERPLANETARY MAGNETIC FIELD (IMF); MAGNETOPAUSE; SOLAR WIND POWER INPUT;

GEOPHYSICS;

HYSTERESIS; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOPAUSE; MAGNETOSPHERE; SOLAR POWER; SOLAR WIND;

EID: 33645886962     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2005GL025188     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Akasofu, S.-I. (1981), Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere, Space Sci. Rev, 28, 121-190.
2. Coleman, I. J. (2005), A multi-spacecraft survey of magnetic field line draping in the dayside magnetosheath, Ann. Geophys., 23, 885-900.
3. Cowley, S. W. H. (1980), Plasma populations in a simple open model magnetosphere, Space Sci. Rev., 26, 217-275.
4. Gonzalez, W. D., and F. S. Mozer (1974), A quantitative model for the potential resulting from reconnection with an arbitrary interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 4186-4194.
5. Janhunen, P. (1996), GUMICS-3: A global ionosphere-magnetosphere coupling simulation with high ionospheric resolution, in Proceedings of Environmental Modelling for Space-Based Applications, Sept. 18-20 1996, Eur. Space Agency Spec. Publ., ESA SP-392, 233-239.
6. Janhunen, P., and H. E. J. Koskinen (1997), The closure of Region-1 field-aligned current in MAD simulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 1419-1422.
7. Kan, J. R., and L. C. Lee (1979), Energy coupling function and solar wind-magnetosphere dynamo, Geophys. Res. Lett., 6, 577-581.
8. Longmore, M., S. J. Schwartz, and E. A. Lucek (2006), North-south IMF and a magnetosheath flow effect on the magnetic field line draping pattern in the dayside magnetosheath, Ann. Geophys., in press.
9. Palmroth, M., T. I. Pulkkinen, P. Janhunen, and C.-C. Wu (2003), Storm-time energy transfer in global MHD simulation, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A1), 1048, doi:10.1029/2002JA009446.
10. Palmroth, M., P. Janhunen, T. I. Pulkkinen, and H. E. J. Koskinen (2004), Ionospheric energy input as a function of solar wind parameters: Global MHD simulation results, Ann. Geophys., 22, 549-566.
11. Pudovkin, M. I., V. S. Semenov, M. F. Heyn, and H. K. Biernat (1986), Implications of the stagnation line model for energy input through the dayside magnetopause, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 213-216.
12. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö. (1974), Magnetopause reconnection rate, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 1546-1549.