The Debate About Sovereignty in the United States: a Historical and Comparative Perspective

Sovereignty in Transition

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 423-446

  Goldsworthy, Jeffrey ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645874906     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. R Bellamy and D Castiglione, ‘Building the Union: The Nature of Sovereignty in the Political Architecture of Europe’, (1997) 16 Law and Philosophy 421 at 441.
2. N MacCormick, Questioning Sovereignty (Oxford, Oxford UP, 1999), 126–30.
3. J Goldsworthy, The Sovereignty of Parliament, History and Philosophy (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1999), 9–16.
4. James Madison, quoted in DR McCoy, The Last of the Fathers; James Madison and the Republican Legacy (Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 1989), 149–50.
5. C E Merriam, A History of the Theory of Sovereignty Since Rousseau (New York, Columbia UP, 1900), 164
6. B Bailyn, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (enlarged ed., Cambridge Mass., Belknap Press, 1992), 198.
7. GS Wood, The Creation of the American Republic 1776–1787 (Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1969), 345.
8. AR Amar, ‘Sovereignty and Federalism’, (1987) 96 Yale Law Journal 1425, 1446–8
9. M Diamond, ‘What the Framers Meant By Federalism’, in RA Goldwin, ed., A Nation of States, Essays on the American Federal System 2nd ed., (Chicago, Rand McNally, 1974) 25, 29–31
10. JR Stromberg, in D Gordon, (ed)., Secession, State & Liberty (New Brunswick and London, Transaction Publishers, 1998), 115 and 118n 81
11. C H Van Tyne, ‘Sovereignty in the American Revolution’, (1906–7)12 American Historical Review 529
12. A C McLaughlin, A Constitutional History of the United States (New York, Appleton-Century, 1935), 135
13. SH Beer, To Make A Nation: The Rediscovery of American Federalism (Cambridge Mass., Harvard UP, 1993), 194
14. J Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (reprint, New York, Da Capo Press, 1970), 320.
15. J Rakove, ‘Parchment Barriers and the Politics of Rights’, in MJ Lacey and K Haakonssen, (eds)., A Culture of Rights: The Bill of Rights in Philosophy, Politics and Law, 1791–1991 (Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 1991), 122–4.
16. JH Read, Power versus Liberty; Madison, Hamilton, Wilson and Jefferson (Charlottesville, University Press of Virginia, 2000), 58 and 72.
17. C Rossiter, (ed)., The Federalist Papers (New York, New American Library, 1961), no. 78, 467–8.
18. E S Morgan, Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America (New York, Norton, 1988), 281.
19. JCD Clark, The Language of Liberty 1660–1832 (Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 1994), 140
20. Mark E Brandon, Free in the World, American Slavery and Constitutional Failure (Princeton, Princeton U.P., 1998), 174–5.
21. J Rakove, Original Meanings, Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (New York, Knopf, 1996), 164.
22. K Stampp, ‘The Concept of a Perpetual Union’, (1978–9) 65 Journal of American History 2, 20.
23. H P Monaghan, ‘We the People[s], Original Understanding, and Constitutional Amendment’, (1996) 96 Columbia Law Review 121 at 121–2.
24. A R Amar ‘Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V’, (1988) 55 University of Chicago Law Review 1043 at 1060.
25. Elai Katz, ‘On Amending Constitutions: The Legality and Legitimacy of Constitutional Entrenchment’, (1996) 29 Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 251, text to n 28.
26. T Anderson, Creating the Constitution: The Convention of 1787 and the First Congress (Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania U.P., 1993), 160.
27. A R Amar, ‘The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V’, (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review 457
28. B Ackerman, We the People 2: Transformations (Cambridge Mass., Harvard U.P., 1998), 69–95.
29. A R Amar, ‘Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Amendment’, in S Levinson, (ed), Responding to Imperfection, The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment (Princeton, Princeton U.P., 1995) 89, 89 n 1.
30. DR Dow, ‘When Words Mean What We Believe They Say: The Case of Article V’, (1990) 76 Iowa Law Review 1
31. JR Vile, ‘Legally Amending the United States Constitution: The Exclusivity of Article V’s Mechanisms’, (1991) 21 Cumberland Law Review 271
32. BW King, ‘Wild Political Dreaming: Historical Context, Popular Sovereignty, and Supermajority Rules’, (2000) 2 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 609.
33. C Rossiter, (ed), The Federalist Papers, above n 29, no.39, 243–4.
34. G Gunther, (ed), John Marshall’s Defence of McCulloch v Maryland (Stanford, Stanford U. P., 1969), 56
35. M Diamond, ‘The Federalist’s View of Federalism’, in G Benson, (ed), Essays in Federalism (Institute for Studies in Federalism, 1961) 21
36. WD Moore, ‘Reconceiving Interpretive Autonomy: Insights From the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions’, (1994) 11 Constitutional Commentary 315 at 319.
37. L. Banning, The Sacred Fire of Liberty: James Madison and the Founding of the Federal Republic (Ithaca, Cornell U.P., 1995), 388–9.
38. A O Spain, The Political Theory of John C Calhoun (New York, Bookman Associates, 1951), 173.
39. J Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (H L A Hart, (ed), London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1954), 251.
40. A V Dicey, Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 2nd ed., (London, MacMillan, 1886), 135.
41. M Radin, ‘The Intermittent Sovereign’, (1940) 39 Yale Law Journal 514, 523–4.
42. J Weiler, ‘Alternatives to Withdrawal From An International Organization: the Case of the European Economic Community’, (1985) 20 Israel Law Review 282.