Auditor Calibration in the Review Process

Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research

Volumn 8, Issue , 2005, Pages 41-57

  Harding, Noel ^a   Hughes, Sally ^a   Trotman, Ken T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645862879     PISSN: 14751488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-1488(04)08002-0     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Bamber E.M., and Ramsay R.J. An investigation of the effects of specialization in audit workpaper review. Contemporary Accounting Research 14 3 (1997) 501-513
2. Bamber E.M., and Ramsay R.J. The effects of specialization in audit workpaper review on review efficiency and reviewer' confidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 19 2 (2000) 147-157
3. Beck P.J., Solomon I., and Tomassini L.A. Subjective prior probability distributions and audit risk. Journal of Accounting Research 23 1 (1985) 37-56
4. Brothwell R., Deffenbacher K., and Brigham J. Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 72 November (1987) 691-695
5. Craik F., and Tulving E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104 3 (1975) 268-294
6. Dilla W., File R.D., Solomon I., and Tomassini L.A. Predictive bankruptcy judgments by auditors. In: Poneman L., and Gabhat D. (Eds). Probabilistic approach auditing: advances in behavioral research (1991), Springer, Berlin
7. Glenberg A., and Epstein W. Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 11 October (1985) 702-718
8. Glenberg A., and Epstein W. Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory and Cognition 15 January (1987) 84-93
9. Harding N., and Trotman K. Hierarchical differences in audit workpaper review performance. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 4 (1999) 671-684
10. Kennedy J., and Peecher M. Judging auditors' technical knowledge. Journal of Accounting Research 35 2 (1997) 279-293
11. Libby R., and Trotman K.T. The review process as a control for differential recall of evidence in auditor judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society 18 6 (1993) 559-574
12. Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B., and Phillips L.D. Calibration of probabilities. The state of the art to 1980. In: Kahneman D., Slovic P., and Tversky A. (Eds). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
13. Mladenovic R., and Simnett R. Examination of contextual effects and changes in task predictability on auditor calibration. Behavioral Research in Accounting 6 (1994) 178-203
14. Moeckel C.L., and Plumlee R.D. Auditors' confidence in accurate and inaccurate recognition of audit evidence. The Accounting Review 64 4 (1989) 653-666
15. Oskamp S. The relationship of clinical experience and training methods to several criteria of clinical prediction. Psychological Monographs 76 28 (1962) 547
16. Pincus K.V. Audit judgment confidence. Behavioral Research in Accounting 3 (1991) 39-64
17. Plous S. The psychology of judgment and decision making (1993), McGraw Hill, New York
18. Raiborn, D.D., & Estes, R. (1986). The impact of personal characteristics on materiality decisions. In: M. Massoud (Ed.), Proceedings-1986 western accounting association annual meeting: the economics of accounting.
19. Ramsay R. Senior/manager differences in audit workpaper review performance. Journal of Accounting Research 32 1 (1994) 127-135
20. Rich J.S., Solomon I., and Trotman K.T. The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 5 (1997) 481-505
21. Rich J.S., Solomon I., and Trotman K.T. Multi-auditor judgment/decision making research: A decade later. Journal of Accounting Literature 16 (1997) 86-126
22. Simnett R. The effect of information selection, information processing and task complexity on predictive accuracy of auditors. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 7/8 (1996) 699-719
23. Sniezek J.A., and Henry R.A. Accuracy and confidence in group judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43 1 (1989) 1-28
24. Snowball D. Some effects of accounting expertise and information load: An empirical study. Accounting Organizations and Society 5 (1980) 323-338
25. Solomon I. Multi-auditor judgment/decision making research. Journal of Accounting Literature 6 (1987) 1-25
26. Solomon I., Ariyo A., and Tomassini L.A. Contextual effects on the calibration of probabilistic judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology 70 3 (1985) 528-532
27. Sprinkle G.B., and Tubbs R.M. The effect of audit risk and information importance on auditor memory during working paper review. The Accounting Review 73 4 (1998) 475-502
28. Tan H.T., and Trotman K.T. Reviewers' responses to anticipated stylization attempts by preparers of audit workpapers. The Accounting Review 78 2 (2003) 581-604
29. Tomassini L.A., Solomon I., Romney M.B., and Krogstad J.L. Calibration of auditor's probabilistic judgments: Some empirical evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 30 3 (1982) 391-406
30. Yates J.F. Judgment and decision making (1990), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
31. Weber R. Auditor decision making on overall system reliability: Accuracy, consensus and the usefulness of a simulation decision aid. Journal of Accounting Research 16 2 (1978) 368-388
32. Winograd B.N., Gerson J.S., and Berlin B.L. Audit Practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 19 2 (2000) 175-182