-
2
-
-
33645871485
-
"Casenote" The Admissibility Determination of Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification: United States v. Smithers 212 F.3d 306 (6th Cir. 2000)"
-
Barnett, M., "Casenote" The Admissibility Determination of Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification: United States v. Smithers, 212 F.3d 306 (6th Cir. 2000)", 70 U.Cin.L.Rev. 751 (2000);
-
(2000)
U.Cin.L.Rev.
, vol.70
, pp. 751
-
-
Barnett, M.1
-
3
-
-
23744512687
-
"Behavioral Science Evidence In The Age Of Daubert: Reflections Of A Skeptic"
-
Brodin, M., "Behavioral Science Evidence In The Age Of Daubert: Reflections Of A Skeptic" (2005), 73 U. Cin. L. Rev. 867.
-
(2005)
U. Cin. L. Rev.
, vol.73
, pp. 867
-
-
Brodin, M.1
-
4
-
-
33645876969
-
-
Canadian Judicial Council, see section 11.24 "Eyewitness Identification Evidence". Found online at: www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca
-
Canadian Judicial Council, Model Jury Instructions in Criminal Matters, see section 11.24 "Eyewitness Identification Evidence". Found online at: www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca.
-
Model Jury Instructions in Criminal Matters
-
-
-
8
-
-
0035564880
-
"Lineup and Photo Spread Procedures: Issues Concerning Policy Recommendations"
-
Levi, A. and Lindsay, R., "Lineup and Photo Spread Procedures: Issues Concerning Policy Recommendations" (2001), 7 Psych. Pub. Pol. and L. 776.
-
(2001)
Psych. Pub. Pol. and L.
, vol.7
, pp. 776
-
-
Levi, A.1
Lindsay, R.2
-
9
-
-
0000304724
-
"Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation"
-
Lindsay, R. and Wells, G., "Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation" (1985) 70 J. Applied Psychology 556.
-
(1985)
J. Applied Psychology
, vol.70
, pp. 556
-
-
Lindsay, R.1
Wells, G.2
-
10
-
-
33645895163
-
"Convicting the Innocent"
-
Found online at: www.canadiancriminallaw.com
-
MacFarlane, B., "Convicting the Innocent" at 15. Found online at: www.canadiancriminallaw.com.
-
-
-
MacFarlane, B.1
-
12
-
-
33645864833
-
"The Admissibility of Expert Identification Testimony In New York Courts According to People v. Lee"
-
Sonnenberg, H., "The Admissibility of Expert Identification Testimony In New York Courts According to People v. Lee" (2002), 12 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 231.
-
(2002)
Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev.
, vol.12
, pp. 231
-
-
Sonnenberg, H.1
-
13
-
-
0003906925
-
"Eyewitness Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement"
-
United States Department of Justice, This guide was prepared through the National Institute of Justice and involved a multidisciplinary group of experts from the United States and Canada. Found online at: www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/178240.pdf
-
United States Department of Justice, "Eyewitness Evidence" A Guide for Law Enforcement". This guide was prepared through the National Institute of Justice and involved a multidisciplinary group of experts from the United States and Canada. Found online at: www.ncjrs.org/ pdffiles1/nij/178240.pdf.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
84925738489
-
"Applied eyewitness testimony research: System variables and estimator variables"
-
Wells, G., "Applied eyewitness testimony research: System variables and estimator variables" (1978) 36 J. Personality and Social Psychology 1546.
-
(1978)
J. Personality and Social Psychology
, vol.36
, pp. 1546
-
-
Wells, G.1
-
15
-
-
33645869450
-
"Note: Rethinking the Role of Expert Testimony Regarding The Reliability of Eyewitness Identifications in New York"
-
Woller, S., "Note: Rethinking the Role of Expert Testimony Regarding The Reliability of Eyewitness Identifications in New York", 48 N.Y.L. Sch.L.Rev. 323 (2003/2004).
-
(2003)
N.Y.L. Sch.L.Rev.
, vol.48
, pp. 323
-
-
Woller, S.1
|