The Importance of Procedural Fairness in Budgeting

Advances in Accounting

Volumn 21, Issue , 2005, Pages 333-356

  Lau, Chong M ^a   Tan, Sharon L C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645849833     PISSN: 08826110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0882-6110(05)21014-3     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Alexander S., and Ruderman M. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research 1 (1987) 117-198
2. Angle H.L., and Perry J. An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 26 1 (1981) 1-14
3. Baron R.M., and Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1173-1182
4. Bartol K.M. Turnover among DP personnel: A causal analysis. Communications of the ACM 26 (1983) 807-811
5. Becker S., and Green D. Budgeting and employee behavior. Journal of Business October (1962) 392-402
6. Bentler P.M. EQS structural equation program manual (1995), Multivariate Software, Inc, Encino, CA
7. Boshoff C., and Mels G. A causal model to evaluate the relationships among supervision, role stress, organizational commitment and internal service quality. European Journal of Marketing 29 (1995) 23-42
8. Brownell P. Participation in the budgeting process; when it works and when it doesn't. Journal of Accounting Literature (1982) 124-153
9. Brownell P. The role of accounting data in performance evaluation, budgetary participation, and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Accounting Research 20 1 (1982) 12-27
10. Chenhall R.H., and Brownell P. The effect of participative budgeting on job satisfaction and performance: role ambiguity as an intervening variable. Accounting, Organizations and Society 13 3 (1988) 225-233
11. Cherrington, D. J., & Cherrington, J. O. (1973). Appropriate reinforcement contingencies in the budgeting process, Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies. Supplement to Journal of Accounting Research, 225-253.
12. Dunham R.B., Smith F.J., and Blackburn R.S. Validation of the index of organizational reactions with the JDI, the MSQ, and faces scales. Academy of Management Journal 20 3 (1977) 420-432
13. Ferris K.R. Organizational commitment and performance in a professional accounting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 6 (1981) 317-325
14. Ferris K.R., and Larcker D.F. Explanatory variables of auditor performance in a large public accounting firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society (1983) 1-11
15. Folger R. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (1977) 108-119
16. Folger R., and Konovsky M. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal 32 (1989) 115-130
17. Folger R., Rosenfield D., and Robinson T. Relative deprivation and procedural justifications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (1979) 268-273
18. French J.R., Israel J., and As D. An experiment on participation in a Norwegian factory, interpersonal dimension of decision making. Human Relations February (1960) 3-19
19. Frucot V., and Shearon W.T. Budgetary participation, locus of control, and Mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction. The Accounting Review 66 1 (1991) 80-99
20. Greenberg J., and Folger R. Procedural justice, participation and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In: Paulus P. (Ed). Basic group process (1983), Springer, New York 235-256
21. Harrison G.L. The cross cultural generalizability of the relation between participation, budget emphasis and job related attitudes. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 1 (1992) 1-15
22. Hopwood A.G. An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research Supplement 10 (1972) 156-182
23. Kanfer R., Sawyer J., Earley P.C., and Lind E.A. Participation in task evaluation procedures: The effects of influential opinion expression and knowledge of evaluative criteria on attitudes and performance. Social Justice Research 1 (1987) 235-249
24. Kenis I. Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance. The Accounting Review LIV 4 (1979) 707-720
25. Ketchand A.A., and Strawser J.R. Multiple dimensions of organizational commitment: Implications for future accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting 13 (2001) 221-251
26. Kim W.C., and Mauborgne R.A. Procedural justice, attitudes and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions. Academy of Management Journal 36 (1993) 502-526
27. Kompass Singapore 2000 (2000). Kompass South East Asia.
28. Kren L. Budgetary participation and managerial performance: The impact of information and environmental volatility. The Accounting Review 67 3 (1992) 511-526
29. Kren R.L., and Liao W.M. The role of accounting information in the control of organizations: A review of the evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature 7 (1988) 280-309
30. Lau C.M., and Buckland C. Budgeting - role of trust and participation: A research note. Abacus 37 3 (2001) 369-388
31. Lau C.M., and Lim E.W. The effects of procedural justice and evaluative styles on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance. Advances in Accounting 19 (2002) 139-160
32. Libby T. The influence of voice and explanation on performance in a participative budgeting setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 (1999) 125-137
33. Libby T. Referent cognitions and budgetary fairness: A research note. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13 (2001) 91-105
34. Lincoln J.R., and Kalleberg A.L. Work organization and workplace commitment: A study of plants and employees in the US and Japan. American Sociology Sociological Reviews 50 (1985) 738-760
35. Lind E.A., Erickson B.E., Friedland N., and Dickenberger M. Reactions to procedural models for adjudicative conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Conflict Resolution 22 (1978) 318-341
36. Lind E.A., and Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice (1988), Plenum Press, New York
37. Lindquist T.M. Fairness as an antecedent to participative budgeting: Examining the effects of distributive justice, procedural justice and referent cognitions on satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 7 (1995) 122-147
38. Lissak R.I., Mendes H., and Lind E.A. Organizational and non organizational influences on attitudes toward work (1983), University of Illinois, Champaign
39. McFarlin D.B., and Sweeney P.D. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 35 3 (1992) 626-637
40. Magner N., and Welker R.B. Responsibility center manager's reactions to justice in budgetary resource allocation. Advances in Management Accounting 3 (1994) 237-253
41. Magner N., Welker R.B., and Campbell T.L. The interactive effect of budgetary participation and budget favorability on attitudes toward budgetary decision makers: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 7/8 (1995) 611-618
42. March J.G., and Simon H.A. Organizations (1985), Wiley, New York
43. Mathieu J.E., and Zajac D.M. A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin 108 2 (1990) 171-194
44. Milani K.W. The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: A field study. The Accounting Review 50 2 (1975) 274-284
45. Mowday R.T., Steers R.M., and Porter L.W. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior 14 2 (1979) 224-247
46. Myer J.P., Allen N.J., and Smith C.A. Commitment to organization and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 4 (1993) 538-551
47. Nouri H. Using organizational commitment and job involvement to predict budgetary slack: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 3 (1994) 289-295
48. Nouri H., and Parker R.J. The effect of organizational commitment on the relation between budgetary participation and budgetary slack. Behavioral Research in Accounting 8 (1996) 74-90
49. Nouri H., and Parker R.J. The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 5/6 (1998) 467-483
50. Oppenheim A.N. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement (1992), Pinter Publishers, London
51. Otley D.T. Budget use and managerial performance. Journal of Accounting Research 16 1 (1978) 122-149
52. Pedhazur E. Multiple regression in behavioral research explanation and prediction. 2nd ed. (1982), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
53. Scarpello V., and Campbell J.P. Job satisfaction: Are all the parts there?. Personnel Psychology 36 3 (1983) 577-600
54. Tang T.L., and Sarsfield-Baldwin L.J. Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment. SAM Advanced Management Journal 61 3 (1996) 25-31
55. Thibaut J., and Walker L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis (1975), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillside, NJ
56. Tyler T.R., Rasinski K., and Spodick N. The influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (1985) 72-81
57. Vroom V.H. Work and motivation (1964), Wiley, New York
58. Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation 22. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center, Work Adjustment Project.
59. Wentzel K. The influence of fairness perceptions and goal commitment on managers' performance in a budget setting. Behavioral Research In Accounting 14 (2002) 247-271