Predicting human chronically paralyzed muscle force: A comparison of three mathematical models

Journal of Applied Physiology

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1027-1036

  Frey Law, Laura A ^a   Shields, Richard K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrical stimulation; Muscle mechanics; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EXERCISE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; OSTEOPOROSIS; PARALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN ULCER; SOLEUS MUSCLE; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STATISTICAL MODEL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; INNERVATION; MATHEMATICS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CHRONIC DISEASE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PARALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 33645835484     PISSN: 87507587     EISSN: 15221601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00935.2005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aaron SL and Stein RB. Comparison of an EMG-controlled prosthesis and the normal human biceps brachii muscle. Am J Phys Med 55: 1-14, 1976.
2. Baratta RV, Zhou BH, and Solomonow M. Frequency response model of skeletal muscle: effect of perturbation level, and control strategy. Med Biol Eng Comput 27: 337-345, 1989.
3. Bawa P and Stein RB. Frequency response of human soleus muscle. J Neurophysiol 39: 788-793, 1976.
4. Bobet J. Can muscle models improve FES-assisted walking after spinal cord injury? J Electromyogr Kinesiol 8: 125-132, 1998.
5. Bobet J and Stein RB. A simple model of force generation by skeletal muscle during dynamic isometric contractions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45: 1010-1016, 1998.
6. Bobet J, Stein RB, and Oguztoreli MN. A linear time-varying model of force generation in skeletal muscle. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40: 1000-1006, 1993.
7. Burnham R, Martin T, Stein R, Bell G, MacLean I, and Steadward R. Skeletal muscle fibre type transformation following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 35: 86-91, 1997.
8. Castro MJ, Apple DF Jr, Hillegass EA, and Dudley GA. Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area within the first 6 months of injury. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 80: 373-378, 1999.
9. Castro MJ, Apple DF Jr, Rogers S, and Dudley GA. Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle mechanics within the first 6 months of injury. Eur J Appl Physiol 81: 128-131, 2000.
10. Castro MJ, Apple DF Jr, Staron RS, Campos GE, and Dudley GA. Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle within 6 mo of injury. J Appl Physiol 86: 350-358, 1999.
11. Chou CP and Hannaford B. Dual stable point model of muscle activation and deactivation. Biol Cybern 66: 511-523, 1992.
12. Close CM and Frederick DK. Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995.
13. Ding J, Binder-Macleod SA, and Wexler AS. Two-step, predictive, isometric force model tested on data from human and rat muscles. J Appl Physiol 85: 2176-2189, 1998.
14. Ding J, Lee SC, Johnston TE, Wexler AS, Scott WB, and Binder-Macleod SA. Mathematical model that predicts isometric muscle forces for individuals with spinal cord injuries. Muscle Nerve 31: 702-712, 2005.
15. Ding J, Storaska JA, and Binder-Macleod SA. Effect of potentiation on the catchlike property of human skeletal muscles. Muscle Nerve 27: 312-319, 2003.
16. Ding J, Wexler AS, and Binder-Macleod SA. Development of a mathematical model that predicts optimal muscle activation patterns by using brief trains. J Appl Physiol 88: 917-925, 2000.
17. Ding J, Wexler AS, and Binder-Macleod SA. A mathematical model that predicts the force-frequency relationship of human skeletal muscle. Muscle Nerve 26: 477-485, 2002.
18. Ding J, Wexler AS, and Binder-Macleod SA. Mathematical models for fatigue minimization during functional electrical stimulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13: 575-588, 2003.
19. Ding J, Wexler AS, and Binder-Macleod SA. A predictive fatigue model-I: predicting the effect of stimulation frequency and pattern on fatigue [erratum appears in IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 11: 86, 2003]. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 10: 48-58, 2002.
20. Ding J, Wexler AS, and Binder-Macleod SA. A predictive fatigue model - II: predicting the effect of resting times on fatigue. IEEE Trans Neural Sys Rehabil Eng 10: 59-67, 2002.
21. Ding J, Wexler AS, and Binder-Macleod SA. A predictive model of fatigue in human skeletal muscles. J Appl Physiol 89: 1322-1332, 2000.
22. DiStefano JJ III, Stubberud AR, and Williams IJ. Feedback and Control Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.
23. Dorgan SJ and O'Malley MJ. A nonlinear mathematical model of electrically stimulated skeletal muscle. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 5: 179-194, 1997.
24. Durfee WK and Palmer KI. Estimation of force-activation, force-length, and force-velocity properties in isolated, electrically stimulated muscle. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 41: 205-216, 1994.
25. Epstein M and Herzog W. Theoretical Models of Skeletal Muscle. Chicester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
26. Frey Law LA and Shields RK. Femoral loads during passive, active, and active-resistive stance after spinal cord injury: a mathematical model. Clin Biomech 19: 313-321, 2004.
27. Frey Law LA and Shields RK. Mathematical models use varying parameter strategies to represent paralyzed muscle force properties: a sensitivity analysis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2: 12, 2005.
28. Gerrits HL, De Haan A, Hopman MT, van Der Woude LH, Jones DA, and Sargeant AJ. Contractile properties of the quadriceps muscle in individuals with spinal cord injury. Muscle Nerve 22: 1249-1256, 1999.
29. Gollee H, Murray-Smith DJ, and Jarvis JC. A nonlinear approach to modeling of electrically stimulated skeletal muscle. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48: 406-415, 2001.
30. Grimby G, Broberg C, Krotkiewska I, and Krotkiewski M. Muscle fiber composition in patients with traumatic cord lesion. Scand J Rehabil Med 8: 37-42, 1976.
31. Hannaford B. A nonlinear model of the phasic dynamics of muscle activation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 37: 1067-1075, 1990.
32. Hartkopp A, Murphy RJ, Mohr T, Kjaer M, and Biering-Sorensen F. Bone fracture during electrical stimulation of the quadriceps in a spinal cord injured subject. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79: 1133-1136, 1998.
33. Hill VA. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 126: 136-195, 1938.
34. Huxley AF. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem 7: 255-318, 1957.
35. Huynh H and Feldt LS. Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split plot designs. J Edu Stat 1: 69-82, 1976.
36. Mannard A and Stein RB. Determination of the frequency response of isometric soleus muscle in the cat using random nerve stimulation. J Physiol 229: 275-296, 1973.
37. Perumal R, Wexler AS, Ding J, and Binder-Macleod SA. Modeling the length dependence of isometric force in human quadriceps muscles. J Biomech 35: 919-930, 2002.
38. Phillips CA, Repperger DW, Neidhard-Doll AT, and Reynolds DB. Biomimetic model of skeletal muscle isometric contraction: I. An energetic-viscoelastic model for the skeletal muscle isometric force twitch. Comput Biol Med 34: 307-322, 2004.
39. Round JM, Barr FM, Moffat B, and Jones DA. Fibre areas and histochemical fibre types in the quadriceps muscle of paraplegic subjects. J Neurol Sci 116: 207-211, 1993.
40. Scelsi R, Marchetti C, Poggi P, Lotta S, and Lommi G. Muscle fiber type morphology and distribution in paraplegic patients with traumatic cord lesion. Histochemical and ultrastructural aspects of rectus femoris muscle. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 57: 243-248, 1982.
41. Shields RK. Fatigability, relaxation properties, and electromyographic responses of the human paralyzed soleus muscle. J Neurophysiol 73: 2195-2206, 1995.
42. Shields RK. Muscular, skeletal, and neural adaptations following spinal cord injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 32: 65-74, 2002.
43. Shields RK and Chang YJ. The effects of fatigue on the torque frequency curve of the human paralyzed soleus muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 7: 3-13, 1997.
44. Shields RK and Dudley-Javoroski S. Musculoskeletal deterioration and hemicorporectomy after spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 83: 263-275, 2003.
45. Shields RK, Law LF, Reiling B, Sass K, and Wilwert J. Effects of electrically induced fatigue on the twitch and tetanus of paralyzed soleus muscle in humans. J Appl Physiol 82: 1499-1507, 1997.
46. Stein RB and Oguztoreli MN. A model of whole muscles incorporating functionally important nonlinearities. In: Nonlinear Phenomena In Mathematical Sciences, edited by Lakshmikantham V. New York: Academic Press, 1982, p. 749-766.
47. Talmadge RJ, Castro MJ, Apple DF Jr, and Dudley GA. Phenotypic adaptations in human muscle fibers 6 and 24 wk after spinal cord injury. J Appl Physiol 92: 147-154, 2002.
48. Wexler AS, Ding J, and Binder-Macleod SA. A mathematical model that predicts skeletal muscle force. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44: 337-348, 1997.
49. Zahalak GI. The two-state cross-bridge model of muscle is an asymptotic limit of multi-state models. J Theor Biol 204: 67-82, 2000.
50. Zahalak GI and Ma SP. Muscle activation and contraction: constitutive relations based directly on cross-bridge kinetics. J Biomech Eng 112: 52-62, 1990.