De-stabilizing and training effects of foot orthoses in multiple sclerosis

Multiple Sclerosis

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 219-226

  Ramdharry, G M ^b   Marsden, J F ^a   Day, B L ^a   Thompson, A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Balance; Foot; Multiple sclerosis; Orthoses; Rehabilitation; Walking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BALANCE DISORDER; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT ORTHOSIS; GAIT DISORDER; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; ORTHOPEDIC SHOE; STANDING; TRAINING; VISION; WALKING; WALKING SPEED;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DISABLED PERSONS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FOOT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; PATIENT EDUCATION; POSTURE; WALKING;

EID: 33645826752     PISSN: 13524585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/135248506ms1266oa     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Morris ME, Cantwell C, Vowels L, Dodd K. Changes in gait and fatigue from morning to afternoon in people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 361-65.
2. Thoumie P, Mevellec E. Relation between walking speed and muscle strength is affected by somatosensory loss in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: 313-15.
3. Sinkjaer T, Anderson JB, Nielsen JF. Impaired stretch reflex and joint torque modulation during spastic gait in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 1996; 243: 566-74.
4. Nelson SR, Di Fabio RP, Anderson JH. Vestibular and sensory interaction deficits assessed by dynamic platform posturography in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104: 62-68.
5. White IJ, McCoy SC, Castellano V, Gutierrez G, Stevens JE, Walter GA et al. Resistance training improves strength and functional capacity in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2004; 10: 668-74.
6. Bateni H, Maki B. Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands and adverse consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 134-46.
7. Cattaneo D, Marazzini F, Crippa A, Cardini R. Do static or dynamic AFOs improve balance? Clin Rehabil 2005; 16: 894-99.
8. Hylton NM. The use of dynamic AFOs and their impact on balance and upper body function. Neurol Rep 1989; 13: 15-18.
9. Hylton NM. Postural and functional impact of dynamic AFOs and FOs in a paediatric population. J Prosthet Orthot 1990; 2: 40-53.
10. Hylton NM. The use of dynamic orthotic systems and electrical stimulation as therapeutic support systems in rehabilitation. 1999. Retrieved 11 September 2004, from http://www.myelitis.net/seattle99/ dynamicafo.pdf
11. Pratt DJ. A critical review of the literature on foot orthoses. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2000; 90: 339-41.
12. Landorf KB, Keenan A. Efficacy of foot orthoses. What does the literature tell us? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2000; 90: 149-58.
13. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung H, Lublin FD et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 121-27.
14. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale. Neurology 1983; 33: 1444-52.
15. Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability. The 12-item MS walking scale (MSWS-12). Neurology 2003; 60: 31-36.
16. McGuigan C, Hutchinson M. Confirming the validity and responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12). Neurology 2004; 62: 2103-105.
17. Watson MJ. Refining the ten-metre walking test for use with neurologically impaired people. Physiotherapy 2002; 88: 386-408.
18. Prieto TE, Myklebust JB, Hoffman RG, Lovett EG, Myklebust BM. Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1996; 43: 956-66.
19. Benedetti MG, Piperno R, Simoncini L, Bonato P, Tonini A, Giannini S. Gait abnormalities in minimally impaired multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 1999; 5: 363-68.
20. Armstrong LE, Winant DM, Swasey PR, Seidle ME, Carter AL, Gehlsen G. Using isokinetic dynamometry to test ambulatory patients with multiple sclerosis. Phys Ther 1983; 63: 1274-79.
21. Ponchitera JA, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Mathews TA, Camione DN. Concentric and eccentric isokinetic lower extremity strength in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992; 16: 114-22.
22. Chen W, Pierson FM, Burnett CN. Force-time measurements of knee muscle functions of subjects with multiple sclerosis. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 934-40.
23. Diener HC, Dichgans J, Guschlbauer B, Bacher M, Rapp H, Klockgether TH. The coordination of posture and voluntary movement in patients with cerebellar dysfunction. Mov Disord 1992; 7: 14-22.
24. Herrera WG. Vestibular and other balance disorders in multiple sclerosis. Differential diagnosis of disequilibrium and topognostic localization. Neurol Clin 1990; 8: 407-20.
25. Day BL, Steiger MJ, Thompson PD, Marsden CD. Effect of vision and stance width on human body motion when standing: implications for afferent control of lateral sway. J Physiol 1993; 469: 479-99.
26. Vrethem M, Ledin T, Ernerudh J, Odkvist L, Holmgren H, Moller C. Correlation between dynamic posturography, clinical investigation, and neurography in patients with polyneuropathy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1991; 53: 294-98.
27. Gatev P, Thomas S, Lou J, Lim M, Hallet M. Effects of diminished and conflicting sensory information on balance in patients with cerebellar deficits. Mov Disord 1996; 11: 654-64.
28. Corna S, Nardone A, Prestinari A, Gallante M, Grasso M, Schieppati M. Comparison of Cawthorne-Cooksey exercises and sinusoidal support surface translations to improve balance in patients with unilateral deficit. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1173-84.
29. Karlsson A, Frykberg G. Correlations between force plate measures for assessment of balance. Clin Biomech 2000; 15: 365-69.
30. Kuhn DR, Shibley NJ, Austin WM, Yochum TR. Radiographic evaluation of weight-bearing orthotics and their effect on flexible pes planus. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999; 22: 221-26.
31. Kavounoudias A, Roll R, Roll J. Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation. J Physiol 2001; 532.3: 869-78.
32. Roll R, Kavounoudias A, Roll J. Cutaneous afferents from human plantar sole contribute to body posture awareness. Neuroreport 2002; 13: 1957-61.
33. Chiang J, Wu G. The influence of foam surfaces on biomechanical variables contributing to postural control. Gait Posture 1997; 5: 239-45.
34. Meyer PF, Oddsson LIE, De Luca CJ. The role of plantar cutaneous sensation in unperturbed stance. Exp Brain Res 2004; 156: 505-12.
35. Carr JR, Shepherd RB. Neurological rehabilitation: optimising motor performance. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998.
36. O'Neill DE, Gill-Body KM, Krebs DE. Posturography changes do not predict functional performance changes. Am J Otol 1998; 19: 797-803.