Consistent standards in medication use: The need to care for patients from research to practice

Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 205-212

  Cipolle, Christina L ^a   Cipolle, Robert J ^a   Strand, Linda M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Documentation; Ethics; Informed consent; Medication therapy management; Pharmaceutical care; Practice standards

Indexed keywords

CYCLOOXYGENASE 2 INHIBITOR; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;

DRUG APPROVAL; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG INFORMATION; DRUG USE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PHARMACIST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; ARTICLE; DRUG THERAPY; HUMAN RELATION; PHARMACY; RESEARCH; STANDARD;

DRUG THERAPY; ETHICS, PHARMACY; HUMANS; PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; RESEARCH;

EID: 33645816948     PISSN: 15443191     EISSN: 15443450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1331/154434506776180720     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. Posey LM. Managing risk [editorial]. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2005;45:15-6.
2. Bhatnagar P. Merck yanks arthritis drug Vioxx. Accessed at http://money.cnn.com/2004/09/30/news/fortune500/merck, December 21, 2004.
3. Couzin J. Withdrawal of Vioxx casts a shadow over COX-2 inhibitors. Science. 2004;306:384-5.
4. FDA urges alternatives to Celebrex. Accessed at www.msnbc.msn.com/id/ 6727955/, December 21, 2004.
5. Steyer R. FDA warns about naproxen. Accessed at www.thestreet.com/stocks/ robertsteyer/10200147.html, December 21, 2004.
6. Heart risks prompt U.S. to halt naproxen study. Accessed at http://cbc.ca/story/science/national/2004/12/21/naproxen041221.html. December 21, 2004.
7. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Bethesda, Md.: National Institutes of Health; 1979. Accessed at www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/ belmont.htm, December 3, 2003.
8. Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morley PC. Pharmaceutical care practice: the clinician's guide, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
9. The Nuremberg Code. In Sugarman J, Mastrolanni AC, Kahn JP, eds. Ethics of research with human subjects: selected policies and resources. Frederick, Md.: University Publishing Group; 1998:12-3.
10. Reverby SM, ed. Tuskegee's truths. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press; 2000.
11. Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C.; 1949:181-2.
12. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly; Helsinki, Finland; 1964.
13. Levi BH. Respecting patient autonomy. Chicago: University of Illinois; 1999.
14. Wear S. Informed consent, patient autonomy and clinician beneficence within health care, 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press; 1998.
15. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
16. Jonsen A. American moralism and the origin of bioethics in the United States. J Med Philos. 1991;16:115-29.
17. Tasman A, Riba MB, Silk KR. The doctor-patient relationship in pharmacotherapy: improving treatment effectiveness. New York: Guildford Press; 2000.
18. Schattner A, Fletcher RH. Research evidence and the individual patient. QJM. 2003;96:1-5.
19. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520-8.
20. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27(suppl 3):S110-S127. Erratum in: Med Care. 1989;27:679.
21. National Library of Medicine. Resource information. National Institutes of Health. Accessed at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/info/resources, November 11, 2004.
22. Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services. 2004; 21 CFR chapt.1 (4-1-01 ed.): 283-5.
23. Geyman JP, Deyo RA, Ramsey SD. Evidence-based clinical practice: concepts and approaches, Boston: Butterworth Heineman; 2000.
24. Freidland DJ, Go AS, Davoren JB, et al. Evidence-based medicine: a framework for clinical practice. Stamford, Conn.: Appleton & Lange; 1998.