Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part VII: Evaluating consumer exposure to nanoscale materials

Toxicological Sciences

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 14-19

  Thomas, Treye ^a   Thomas, Karluss ^b   Sadrieh, Nakissa ^c   Savage, Nora ^d   Adair, Patricia ^a   Bronaugh, Robert ^c  

^a US Consumer Product Safety Commission   (United States)

^b ILSI HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^d U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer products; Exposure assessment; Nanoscale materials; Product safety; Regulatory agencies

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC; DOMESTIC CHEMICAL; DRUG; NANOPARTICLE; SUNSCREEN;

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONSUMER; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; FOOD QUALITY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; NANOTECHNOLOGY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SPORT; TEXTILE FIBER; UNITED STATES; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

COSMETICS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; HUMANS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SAFETY; SPORTS EQUIPMENT; SUNSCREENING AGENTS; TEXTILES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33645813149     PISSN: 10966080     EISSN: 10960929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj129     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Agins, T. (2004). Trends (A special report). The Wall Street Journal. 22 November.
2. Azoulay, J. (2005). Get smart. AATCC Rev. 5, 34-36.
3. Beyer, G. (2005). What is important for technical flame retardant applications by nanocomposites - 2005. Flame Retardancy News 15, 9-10.
4. Bourne, M., and Yun, K. (2005). Nanotechnology Industry Category Overview. Prepared for the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO). EM Tech Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
5. Cole, M. (2004). Infant nanotechnology industry searches for big opportunities. Int. Fiber J. 19, 12-15.
6. Doshi, J., and Reneker, D. H. (1995). Electrospinning process and applications of electrospun fibers. J. Electrostat. 35, 151-160.
7. Dreher, K. (2004). Health and environmental impact of nanotechnology: Toxicological assessment of manufactured nanoparticles. Toxicol. Sci. 77, 3-5.
8. EmTech Research (2005). 2005 Nanotechnology Industry Category Overview.
9. Popowitz, N. (2003). Nano-Tex: How an accidental startup got funded, perfected its product and saved not only Burlington industries, but maybe the entire U.S. textile/apparel industry. In Anthology of High Technology. University of Southern California. BAEP 557: Technology Commercialization, Spring, 98-111.
10. Rodie, J. B. (2001). Quality fabric of the month: Like water rolling off a ducks back. Textile World 30, 20.
11. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) (1992). Labeling requirements for art materials presenting chronic hazards; guidelines for determining chronic toxicity of products subject to the FHSA 16 CFR Part 1500.135;
12. see also preamble and supplementary definition of "toxic" under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act. 57 Fed. Regist. 46626-46674.
13. Wakelyn, P. J. (1994). Cotton yarn manufacturing. In ILO Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 4th ed. (A. L. Ivester and J. D. Neefus, Eds.), pp. 89.9-89.11. International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland.