Community pharmacy managers' perception of computerized drug-drug interaction alerts

Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 148-153

  Abarca, Jacob ^a   Malone, Daniel C ^a   Skrepnek, Grant H ^a   Rehfeld, Rick A ^a   Murphy, John E ^a   Grizzle, Amy J ^a   Armstrong, Edward P ^a   Woosley, Raymond L ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; Community and ambulatory pharmacy; Drug interactions; Surveys

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMMUNITY CARE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG INTERACTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MANAGER; PERCEPTION; PHARMACIST ATTITUDE; PHARMACY; PHYSICIAN; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WORKLOAD; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STATISTICS;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMMUNITY PHARMACY SERVICES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; DRUG INTERACTIONS; HUMANS;

EID: 33645812110     PISSN: 15443191     EISSN: 15443450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1331/154434506776180676     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 1999.
2. Hansten PD. Pharmacists' detection of serious drug interactions. Seattle: University of Washington Department of Pharmacy. Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Report 2. 1996;2:4.
3. Fulda TR, Baluck RJ, Vander Zanden J, et al. Disagreement among drug compendia on inclusion and ratings of drug-drug interactions. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2000;61:540-48.
4. Abarca J, Malone DC, Armstrong EP, et al. Concordance of severity ratings provided in four drug interaction compendia. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2004;44:136-41.
5. Murphy JM, Forrey RA, Desiraju U. Community pharmacists' responses to drug-drug interaction alerts. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004;61:1484-7.
6. Armstrong EP, Denemark CR. How pharmacists respond to on-line, real-time DUR alerts. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1998;38:149-54.
7. Hazlet TK, Lee TA, Hansten PD, Horn JR. Performance of community pharmacy drug interaction software. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2001;41:200-4.
8. Cavuto NJ, Woosley RL, Sale M. Pharmacies and prevention of potentially fatal drug interactions. JAMA. 1996;275:1086-7.
9. Chui MA, Rupp MT. Evaluation of online prospective DUR programs in community pharmacy practice. J Manag Care Pharm. 2000;6:27-32.
10. Armstrong EP, Markson TJ. On-line DUR messages: pharmacists' attitudes and actions in response. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1997;NS37:315-20.
11. Bates DW, Leape LL. Pharmacies and prevention of potentially fatal drug interactions. JAMA. 1996;275:1086-7.
12. Glassman PA, Simon B, Belperio P, Lanto A. Improving recognition of drug interactions: benefits and barriers to using automated drug alerts. Med Care. 2002;40:1161-71.
13. Magnus D, Rodgers S, Avery AJ. GPs' views on computerized drug interaction alerts: questionnaire survey. J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;27:377-82.
14. Aydin CE. Survey methods for assessing social impacts of computers in health care organizations., In: Anderson JG, Aydin CE, Jay SJ, eds. Evaluating health care information systems: methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications; 1994:69-115.