Psychodynamic psychotherapy: An effectiveness study

Research on Social Work Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 166-175

  Roseborough, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Effectiveness; Efficacy; Intervention research; Outcome; Psychoanalytic; Psychodynamic; Randomized clinical trial

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645797534     PISSN: 10497315     EISSN: 15527581     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049731505281373     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. American Psychological Association. (1993). A report adopted by the Division 12 Board. Washington, DC: Division 12 Office of the American Psychological Association.
2. Anderson, E. M., & Lambert, M. J. (1995). Short-term dynamically oriented psychotherapy: A review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 15 (6). 503-514.
3. Asay, T., Lambert, M., Gregersen, & Goates, M. (2002). Using patient-focused research in evaluating treatment outcome in private practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1213-1225.
4. Barber, S., & Lane, R. C. (1995). Efficacy research in psychodynamic therapy: A critical review of the literature. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 14 (3). 43-69.
5. Barkham, M., Rees, A., & Shapiro, D. (1996). Outcomes of time-limited psychotherapy in applied settings: Replicating the second Sheffield psychotherapy project. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 64, 1079-1085.
6. Beck, J. S. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York: Guilford.
7. Benson, H., & Stark, M. (1996). Timeless healing: The power and biology of belief. New York: Scribner.
8. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Congdon, R. (2001). Optimal design: Freeware/shareware program for calculating power within a mixed or hierarchical linear model. Retrieved on April 20, 2004, from www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/multilevel.html
10. Cooper, G. (2003 March/April). Clinician's digest. Psychotherapy Networker, p. 16.
11. Doidge, N. (1999). How to preserve psychoanalysis: Introduction to Gunderson and Gabbard. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 673-676.
12. Exploratory/developmental grants for psychosocial treatment research. (1993). Program Announcement No. 93-093. National Institute of Mental Health Guide, 22 ( 21 ).
13. Freedman, N., Hoffenberg, J., Vorus, N., & Frosch, A. (1999). The effectiveness of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: The role of treatment duration, frequency of sessions, and the therapeutic relationship. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 741-771.
14. Gabbard, G. (2000). Psychodynamic psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
15. Gabbard, G. O., Gunderson, J. G., & Fonagy, P. (2002). The place of psychoanalytic treatments within psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 505-510.
16. Gunderson, J., & Gabbard, G. (1999). Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 679-704.
17. Gunderson, J. G., & Gabbard, G. O. (1999). Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 679-704.
18. Huber, D., Klug, G., & von Rad, M. (2002). The Munich psychotherapy study: A process-outcome comparison between psychoanalysis and psychodynamic psychotherapies. In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber & M. Target (Eds.), Outcome of psychoanalytic treatment: Perspectives for therapists and researchers. New York: Whurr.
19. Hubble, M. A., Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (1999). The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20. Kernberg, O. F. (1991, May 11). The current status of psychoanalysis. Keynote address presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychoanalytic Association, New Orleans, LA.
21. Kopta, S., Howard, K., Lowry, J., & Beutler, L. (1994). Patterns of symptomatic recovery in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 62, 1009-1016.
22. Lambert, M. J., Finch, A. E., & Maruish, M. E. (Eds.). (1999). The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Lambert, M. J., Gregersen, A. T., Burlingame, G. M., & Marush, M. E. (Ed.). (2004). The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Vol. 3: Instruments for adults (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., Umpress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiishi, J., & Burlingame, G. M. (1996). Administration and scoring for the OQ-45.2. Wilmington, DE: American Professional Credentialing Services.
25. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Hawkins, E. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Smart, D. W. (2003). Is it time to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 10 (3). 288-315.
26. Leichsenring, F. (2001). Comparative effects of short term dynamic psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy in depression: A meta-analytic approach. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 401-419.
27. Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1223-1232.
28. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.
29. Lipsey, M. W. (1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Miller, N. E., Luborsky, L., Barber, J., & Docherty, J. (1993). Psychodynamic treatment research: A handbook for clinical practice. New York: Basic Books.
31. Mueller, R. M., Lambert, M. J., & Burlingame, G. M. (1998). Construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 248-262
32. Nathan, P. E., Stuart, S. P., & Dorn, S. L. (2000). Research on psychotherapy efficacy and effectiveness: Between Scylla & Charybdis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 964-981.
33. Olfson, M., Marcus, S. C., Druss, D., & Pincus, H. A. (2002). National trends in the use of outpatient psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1914-1920.
34. Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.
35. Raudenbush, S. W., & Xiao-Feng, L. (2001). Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychological Methods, 6, 387-401.
36. Sandell, R., Bloomberg, J., Lazar, A., & Carlsson, J. (2000). Varieties of long-term outcome among patients in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy: A review of findings from the Stockholm outcome of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy project (STOPPP). International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 921-942.
37. Seligman, M. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: the Consumer Reports study. American Psychologist, 50, 965-974.
38. Stone, A. (1997, January/February). Where will psychoanalysis survive: What remains of Freudianism when its scientific center crumbles? Harvard Magazine, pp. 35-39.
39. Strupp, H., & Binder, J. L. (1984). Psychotherapy in a new key: A guide to time-limited dynamic psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
40. Svartberg, M., Seltzer, M., & Stiles, T. (1998). The effects of common and specific factors in short-term anxiety-provoking psychotherapy: a pilot process-outcome study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186, 691-696.
41. Svartberg, M., & Stiles, T. C. (1991). Comparative effects of short term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 704-714.
42. Vaughan, S. C., Marshall, R. D., Mackinnon, R. A., Vaughan, R., Mellman, L., & Roose, S. P. (2000). Can we do psychoanalytic outcome research? A feasibility study. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 513-527.
43. Wallerstein, R. S. (1986). Forty-two lives in treatment: A study in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York: Guilford.
44. Warner, L. K. (1998). A comparison of dose-response curves in cognitive behavioral and psychodynamic psychotherapy. Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University.
45. Wilkinson, L., and the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.