Assessing the transfer function: Benchmarking best practices from state higher education agencies

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 257-268

  Welsh, John F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645792662     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930220138615     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ADAMS, J. (1999) Learning from transfer data exchange, Michigan Community College Journal: Research and Practice, 5(2), pp. 53-67.
2. AHUMADA, M. (1993) Inter-institutional transfer and articulation: the role of databases and information systems, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 17(2), pp. 141-152.
3. ALSTETE, J. (1995) Benchmarking in Higher Education: adapting best practices to improve quality. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 5 (Washington, DC, The George Washington University).
4. BRAGG, A. K. (1989) Beyond the college: state policy impact on student tracking systems, in: T. BERS (Ed.) New Directions for Community Colleges: using student tracking systems effectively, No. 66 (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
5. CAMP, R. C. (1989) Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance (Milwaukee, WI, American Society for Quality Control/Quality Press).
6. CLAGETT, C. G. & HUNTINGTON, R. (1991) Assessing the transfer function: data exchange s and transfer rates, Community College Review, 19(4), pp. 21-26.
7. COHEN, A. M. & BRAWER, F. (1987) The Collegiate Function of Community Colleges (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
8. COHEN, A.M. & BRAWER, F. (1989) The American Community College (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
9. EWELL, P. T. (1995) Working over time: the evolution of longitudinal student tracking databases, in: P. EWELL (Ed.) New directions for institutional research: student tracking: new techniques, new demands, No. 87 (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
10. EWELL, P. T. & JONES, D. (1987) Principles of longitudinal enrollment analysis: conducting retention and student flow studies, in: J. A. MUFFO & G. W. MCLAUGHLIN (Eds) A Primer on Institutional Research (Tallahassee, FL, Association for Institutional Research).
11. EWELL, P. T. & JONES, D. (1991) Assessing and reporting student progress: a response to the new accountability (Denver, State Higher Education Executive Officers).
12. KINTZER, F. C. (1989) Articulation and Transfer: A Review of Current Literature on Statewide and Inter-Institutional Models and Trends. ERIC Document 311 946 (Trenton, NJ, New Jersey State Department of Higher Education).
13. KNOELL, D. M. & MEDSKER, L. L. (1965) From Junior to Senior College: a national study of the transfer student (Washington, DC, American Council on Education).
14. LENTH, C. & RUSSELL, A. B. (1991) Statewide Student Data Systems and Capabilities to Report Postsecondar y Graduation Rates (Denver, State Higher Education Executive Officers).
15. MCGUINNESS, A. (1997) State Postsecondar y Education Structure s Sourcebook (Denver, Education Commission of the States).
16. MCMURTRIE, B. (2001) Community colleges become a force in developing nations worldwide, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 25 May, 47(37), p. A44.
17. MCNAIR, C. J. & LEIBFRIED, K. (1992) Benchmarking: a tool for continuous improvement (New York, John Wiley and Sons).
18. NEWMAN, F. (1987) Choosing Quality: reducing conflict between the state and university (Denver, Education Commission of the States).
19. RIFKIN, T. (2000) Improving Articulation Policy to Increase Transfer (Denver, CO, Community College Policy Center, Education Commission of the States).
20. RODRIGUEZ, E. (1994) State-level Educational Reform: collaborative roles for higher education (Denver, State Higher Education Executive Officers).
21. RUSSELL, A. B. (1999) The Status of Statewide Student Transition Data Systems: a survey of SHEEO agencies (Denver, State Higher Education Executive Officers).
22. RUSSELL, A. B. (2000) Issue Priorities and Trends in State Higher Education (Denver, State Higher Education Executive Officers).
23. RUSSELL, A. B. & CHISHOLM, M. (1995) Tracking in multi-institutional contexts, in: P. EWELL (Ed.) New Directions for Institutiona l Research: student tracking: new techniques, new demands, No. 87 (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
24. TRAINER, J. F. (1996) New Directions for Institutional Research: inter-institutional data sharing, No. 89 (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
25. WALLERI, R. D. (1990) Tracking and follow-up for community college students: institutional and statewide initiatives, Community/junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 14(1), pp. 21-36.