A review and evaluation of doctoral programs 2000-2004 by the american academy of kinesiology and physical education

Quest

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 176-196

  Thomas, Jerry R ^a   Reeve, T Gilmour ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645789753     PISSN: 00336297     EISSN: 15432750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2006.10491878     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Hasbrook, C.A., & Loy, J.W. (1983). Assessment of doctoral programs in physical education: Reports, rankings, and recommendations. Quest, 35, 131-144.
2. Massengale, J.D. (1987). Current status of graduate physical education: Program demography and the issue of program rankings. Quest, 39, 97-102.
3. Massengale, J.D., & Sage, G.H. (1982). Departmental prestige and career mobility patterns of college physical educators. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53, 305-312.
4. Siedentop, D. (1987). Going public: Quality control in graduate education. Quest, 39, 82-87.
5. Spirduso, W.W. (1987). Graduate program ranking in physical education. Quest, 39, 103-113.
6. Thomas, J.R., Morrow, J.R., & Stevermer, C. (2004). Evaluating doctoral education in physical activity: Role of the American Academy of Kinesiology and Physical Education. Quest, 56, 361-376.