Access to the scientific literature - A difficult balance

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 354, Issue 15, 2006, Pages 1552-1555

  Frank, Martin ^a  

^a The American Physiological Society   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; INTERNET; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; ECONOMICS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; UNITED STATES;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATABASES; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33645787606     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp068004     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Willinsky J. The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2006.
2. Frank M, Reich M, Ra'anan A. A not-for-profit publisher's perspective on open access. Serials Rev 2004;30:281-7.
3. McCabe M. The impact of publisher mergers on journal prices: an update. ARL Bimonthly Report 1999:207. (Accessed March 23, 2006, at http://www.arl.org/ newsltr/207/jrnlprices.html.)
4. Bergstrom TC. Free labor for costly journals? J Econ Perspect 2001;15:183-98.
5. Davis PM, Ehling T, Habicht O, How S, Saylor JM, Walker K. Report of the CUL Task Force on open access publishing presented to the Cornell University Management Team August 9, 2004. (Accessed March 23, 2006, at http://dspace.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/193.)