Investigation of multi-modal interface features for adaptive automation of a human-robot system

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 527-540

  Kaber, David B ^a   Wright, Melanie C ^b   Sheik Nainar, Mohamed A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive automation; Human robot interaction; Multi modal interface design; Situation awareness

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HAPTIC INTERFACES; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); REMOTE CONTROL; ROBOTICS;

ADAPTIVE AUTOMATION (AA); HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; MULTI-MODAL INTERFACE DESIGN; SITUATION AWARENESS;

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 33645783247     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ballas, J.A., Heitmeyer, C.L., Perez, M.A., 1991. Interface styles for adaptive automation. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, vol. 1, Columbus, OH, pp. 108-113.
2. Blattner, M.M., 2000. A design for auditory display. In: Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, pp. 219-222.
3. Blattner M.M., Sumikawa D.A., and Greenberg R.M. Earcons and icons: their structure and common design principles. Human-Computer Interaction 4 (1989) 11-44
4. Brewster S.A. Using nonspeech sounds to provide navigation cues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 5 3 (1998) 224-259
5. Brewster, S.A., Wright, P.C., Edwards, A.D.N., 2001. Guidelines for the creation of earcons [online]. Available at: 〈http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~stephen/earcon_guidelines.shtml〉 (March 1, 2002).
6. Endsley M.R. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37 1 (1995) 65-84
7. Hancock P.A., and Chignell M.H. Mental workload dynamics in adaptive interface design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18 (1988) 647-658
8. Hart S.G., and Staveland L.E. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock P.A., and Meshkati N. (Eds). Human Mental Workload (1988), Elsevier Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam 139-183
9. Hilburn B.G., Jorna P., Byrne E.A., and Parasuraman R. The effect of adaptive air traffic control (ATC) decision aiding on controller mental workload. In: Mouloua M., and Koonce J.M. (Eds). Human-Automation Interaction: Research and Practice (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 84-91
10. Kaber D.B., and Endsley M.R. The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5 2 (2004) 113-153
11. Kaber D.B., and Riley J. Adaptive automation of a dynamic control task based on secondary task workload measurement. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 3 3 (1999) 169-187
12. Kieras D.E., and Meyer D.E. An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with applications to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 12 (1997) 391-438
13. Mackworth N.H. Stimulus sensitivity limits the useful field of view. In: Monty R.A., and Senders J.W. (Eds). Eye Movements and Psychological Processes (1976), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
14. Navon D., and Gopher D. On the economy of the human information processing system. Psychological Review 86 (1979) 214-255
15. Nikolic M.I., Sklar A.E., and Sarter N.B. Multisensory feedback in support of pilot-automation coordination: the case of uncommanded mode transitions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (1998), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA 239-243
16. Parasuraman R., Mouloua M., Molloy R., and Hilburn B. Adaptive function allocation reduces performance costs of static automation. In: Jensen R.S., and Neumeister D. (Eds). Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (1993), Department of Aviation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 178-185
17. Parasuraman R., Mouloua M., and Molloy R. Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Human Factors 38 4 (1996) 665-679
18. Rouse W.B. Human-computer interaction in multi-task situations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-7 (1977) 384-392
19. Sarter N. Multimodal communication in support of coordinative functions in human-machine teams. In: Kaber D.B., and Endsley M.R. (Eds). Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation: User-Centered Design for the New Millennium (2000), Omnipress, Madison, WI 47-50
20. Sarter N.B., and Woods D.D. How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors 37 1 (1995) 5-19
21. ® User's Guide, Version 6. fourth ed (1990), SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC
22. Scerbo M.W. Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In: Parasuraman R., and Mouloua M. (Eds). Human Performance in Automated Systems: Theory and Applications (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 37-64
23. Shiff, B., 1983. An experimental study of the human-computer interface in process control. Unpublished Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.
24. Sklar A.E., and Sarter N.B. Good vibrations: tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains. Human Factors 41 4 (1999) 534-552
25. Wickens C.D. Processing resources in attention. In: Parasuraman R., and Davies R. (Eds). Varieties of Attention (1984), Academic Press, Orlando, FL 63-101
26. Wickens C.D. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. second ed (1992), HarperCollins, New York
27. Williams R.N. Cognitive load and the functional field of view. Human Factors 24 (1982) 683-692