Coordination dependence of magnetic properties within a family of related [FeII2] complexes of a triazine-based ligand

European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn , Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1353-1361

  Quesada, Manuel ^a   De Hoog, Paul ^a   Gamez, Patrick ^a   Roubeau, Olivier ^b   Aromí, Guillem ^c   Donnadieu, Bruno ^d   Massera, Chiara ^e   Lutz, Martin ^f   Spek, Anthony L ^f   Reedijk, Jan ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHE PAUL PASCAL   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^d LCC LABORATOIRE DE CHIMIE DE COORDINATION   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^f UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

1,3,5 Triazine; Iron(II) complexes; Magnetic properties; Polydentate ligands; Spin crossover

Indexed keywords

GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; IONS; IRON COMPOUNDS; LIGANDS; SINGLE CRYSTALS; TEMPERATURE;

1,3,5-TRIAZINE; CO-ORDINATION CHEMISTRIES; COMPLEX 1; COUNTERIONS; DINUCLEAR COMPLEX; IRON(II) COMPLEX; POLYDENTATE LIGAND; SOLVENT SYSTEM; SPIN CROSSOVERS; X-RAY STRUCTURE;

MAGNETIC PROPERTIES;

EID: 33645782204     PISSN: 14341948     EISSN: 10990682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.200501022     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. J. S. Miller, M. Drillon (Eds.), Magnetism: Molecules to Materials V, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005.
2. P. J. van Koningsbruggen in Spin Crossover in Transition Metal Compounds I, Topics in Current Chemistry (Eds.: P. Gütlich, H. A. Goodwin), 2004, vol. 233, p. 123.
3. P. Gütlich, A. Hauser, H. Spiering, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2024.
4. A. K. Boudalis, B. Donnadieu, V. Nastopoulos, J. Modesto Clemente-Juan, A. Mari, Y. Sanakis, J.-P. Tuchagues, S. P. Perlepes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2266.
5. T. K. Karmakar, B. K. Ghosh, A. Usman, H.-K. Fun, E. Rivière, T. Mallah, G. Aromí, S. K. Chandra, Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 2391.
6. F. Lloret, G. De Munno, M. Julve, J. Cano, R. Ruiz, A. Caneschi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 135.
7. I. Fernandez, R. Ruiz, J. Faus, M. Julve, F. Lloret, J. Cano, X. Ottenwaelder, Y. Journaux, M. C. Muñoz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3039.
8. P. de Hoog, P. Gamez, W. L. Driessen, J. Reedijk, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6783.
9. P. Gamez, P. de Hoog, O. Roubeau, M. Lutz, W. L. Driessen, A. L. Spek, J. Reedijk, Chem. Commun. 2002, 1488.
10. S. Demeshko, S. Dechert, F. Meyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4508.
11. P. Gamez, P. de Hoog, M. Lutz, W. L. Driessen, A. L. Spek, J. Reedijk, Polyhedron 2003, 22, 205.
12. H. Casellas, C. Massera, P. Gamez, A. M. Manotti Lanfredi, J. Reedijk, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 2902-2908.
13. G. Aromí, O. Roubeau, M. Helliwell, S. J. Teat, R. E. P. Winpenny, Dalton Trans. 2003, 3436.
14. A. Machkour, D. Mandon, M. Lachkar, R. Welter, Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 1545.
15. A. B. Gaspar, V. Ksenofontov, J. A. Real, P. Gütlich, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 373, 385.
16. J. A. Real, H. Bolvin, A. Bousseksou, A. Dworkin, O. Kahn, F. Varret, J. Zarembowitch, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4650.
17. Complex 1 (77 K) presents an HS doublet with I.S. = 1.46, Q.S. = 3.45 and relative intensity = 37%, and an LS singlet with I.S. = 0.77, Q.S. = 0.26 and relative intensity = 63%.
18. C. J. O'Connor, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 29, 203.
19. Note that a normalisation of the data has been performed to take into account the residual fraction of 37% at 77 K, as measured by Mössbauer spectroscopy. Such a high residual fraction, although often ascribed to defaults, may arise from a thermal equilibrium between states of the same energy (ΔH = 0) but with different degeneracies and thus degrees of freedom.
20. O. Roubeau, M. de Vos, A. F. Stassen, R. Burriel, J. G. Haasnoot, J. Reedijk, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2003, 64, 1003.
21. M. Sorai, Y. Maeda, H. Oshio, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1990, 51, 941.
22. R. Jakobi, H. Romstedt, H. Spiering, P. Gütlich, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 178.
23. T. Nakamoto, Z. C. Tan, M. Sorai, Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 3805.
24. H. Toftlund, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1989, 94, 67.
25. N. Moliner, M. C. Muñoz, P. J. van Koningsbruggen, J. A. Real, Inorg. Chim. Acta 1998, 274, 1.
26. K. H. Sugiyarto, D. C. Craig, A. D. Rae, H. A. Goodwin, Aust. J. Chem. 1994, 47, 869.
27. i is the calculated value.
28. R. L. Carlin, Magnetochemistry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.
29. O. Kahn, Molecular Magnetism, VCH, New York, 1993, p. 17.
30. H. Oshio, N. Hoshino, T. Ito, M. Nakano, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8805.
31. 2 is not observed clearly in 1, probably because of overlap with metal to ligand charge transfer.
32. N. Walker, D. Stuart, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1983, 39, 158.
33. A. Altomare, G. G. Cascarano, C. Giacovazzo, A. Guagliardi, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 343.
34. A. Altomare, M. C. Burla, M. Camalli, G. L. Cascarano, C. Giacovazzo, A. Guagliardi, A. G. G. Moliterni, G. Polidori, R. Spagna, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 115.
35. G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structure Refinement, University of Göttingen, 1997.
36. A. L. Spek, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 7.
37. SAINT, Software Users Guide, Bruker Analytical X-ray Systems, version 6.0, 1999.
38. G. M. Sheldrick, SADABS: Area-Detector Absorption Correction, version 2.03, University of Göttingen, 1999.
39. M. Nardelli, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1996, 296.
40. L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1997, 30, 565.