Onset but not offset of irrelevant motion disrupts inhibition of return

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1460-1467

  Abrams, Richard A ^a   Christ, Shawn E ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645775731     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193650     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & CHRIST, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14, 427-432.
2. ABRAMS, R. A., & CHRIST, S. E. (2004, May). Automatic capture of attention by the onset of motion. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
3. ABRAMS, R. A., & CHRIST, S. E. (2005). The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri and Simons (2003). Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 219-223.
4. ABRAMS, R. A., & DOBKIN, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 467-477.
5. ABRAMS, R. A., & PRATT, J. (1996). Spatially diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: A reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1294-1298.
6. ABRAMS, R. A., & PRATT, J. (2000). Oculocentric coding of inhibited eye movements to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 776-788.
7. CHRIST, S. E., MCCRAE, C. S., & ABRAMS, R. A. (2002). Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 80-85.
8. FRANCONERI, S. L., & SIMONS, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 999-1010.
9. JORDAN, H., & TIPPER, S. P. (1998). Object-based inhibition of return in static displays. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 504-509.
10. KNAPP, W. H., III, & ABRAMS, R. A. (2001, November). Automatic multilocation inhibition of return. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
11. MACHADO, L., & RAFAL, R. (2004). Inhibition of return generated by voluntary saccades is independent of attentional momentum. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 789-796.
12. MCCRAE, C. S., & ABRAMS, R. A. (2001). Age-related differences in object- and location-based inhibition of return of attention. Psychology & Aging, 16, 437-449.
13. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual attention. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-536). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. RAFAL, R., CALABRESI, P., BRENNAN, C., & SCIOLTO, T. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 673-685.
15. SNYDER, J. J., & KINGSTONE, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 452-458.
16. SNYDER, J. J., & KINGSTONE, A. (2001). Inhibition of return at multiple locations in visual search: When you see it and when you don't. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1221-1237.
17. THEEUWES, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
18. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., HAHN, S., & IRWIN, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379-385.
19. TIPPER, S. P., DRIVER, J., & WEAVER, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
20. TIPPER, S. P., & WEAVER, B. (1998). The medium of attention: Locationbased, object-centered, or scene-based? In R. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 77-107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. TIPPER, S. P., WEAVER, B., JERREAT, L. M., & BURAK, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 478-499.
22. WEAVER, B., LUPIÁÑEZ, J., & WATSON, F. L. (1998). The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 993-1003.
23. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134.